similar to: [LLVMdev] clang and __builtin_va_list

I am using the clang API (version 3.1 - trunk 153913) to compile some very simple code as follows class MyClass { ~MyClass() ; }; MyClass::~MyClass() { } int main() { return 0; } My problem is that I get the error message: test.cpp:20:10: error: destructor cannot have a return type MyClass::~MyClass() If someone can point me to the right direction that would be great. It compiles fine if

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Kamaljit Lall <klall at factset.com> wrote: > I am using the clang API (version 3.1 - trunk 153913) to compile some > very simple code as follows**** > > class MyClass > { > ~MyClass() ; > > }; > > MyClass::~MyClass() > { > > } > > int main() > { > return 0; > } **** > > My problem is that

Hello, I've seen various threads on people reporting: step factor 0.000488281 reduced below `minFactor' of 0.000976563 While I know how to set the minFactor, what I'd like to have happen is for nls to return to me, the last or closest fitted parameters before it errors out. In other words, so I don't get convergence, I'd still like to acquire the values of the parameters

Hi, For now no. But I will add this three builtins to CGBuiltin.cpp. If you want, you can be a reviewer of this change. Regards Michael Zuckerman From: Craig Topper [mailto:craig.topper at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 04:53 To: Zuckerman, Michael <michael.zuckerman at intel.com> Subject: Re: r267690 - [Clang][BuiltIn][AVX512]Adding intrinsics for vmovntdqa vmovntpd vmovntps

Hi , In the future, we will address this issue. Regards Michael Zuckerman From: Eric Christopher [mailto:echristo at gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 19:54 To: Zuckerman, Michael <michael.zuckerman at intel.com>; Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] r267690 - [Clang][BuiltIn][AVX512]Adding intrinsics for vmovntdqa

I selected the defaults in partitioning my drive and df -h shows: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 18G 2.5G 15G 15% / /dev/hda1 99M 12M 82M 13% /boot none 126M 0 126M 0% /dev/shm Now I am getting ready to install Scalix CE and it is telling me a whole story about what my

Hello，everyone. I am very embarrassed to ask such a simple question. I want to add an intrinsics(named max_qb) in x86 backend. In include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsX86.td, I add a intrinsics (GCCBuiltin). In clang( BuiltinsX86.def ), I add a BUILTIN. And in x86 backend , I change : the X86InstrInfo.td to add def X86max_qb_flag , X86InstrArithmetic.td to add define of instruction , X86ISelLowering.cpp to

I have LSI Logic MegaRAID 8480 Storage controller I am having trouble reconfigure one of the hardware raid devices It is configured with 4 hardware raid logical volumes on /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd. I am in the middle of rebuilding the system, ?and at this point I am only using one of the volumes, /dev/sda /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, and /dev/sdd are all 2 drive raid1 mirrors I will be

Hi Everyone！ I am a newbie at llvm. So the question may be fundamental but difficult to me. I want to add an trinsics in x86 and make the following changes.I want that max_qb can find the max of two Integers and return it. In src/include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.td : let TargetPrefix = "x86" in { def int_x86_max_qb: GCCBuiltin<"__builtin_x86_max_qb">,

Hi all, I know __builtin_va_list is target-specific, and ARM has typedef void* __builtin_va_list; X86 has typedef char* __builtin_va_list; It seems they can be treated as the same prototype,i.e.. void*, at the header level. What I want to ask is: If I write a program use "typedef *void** __builtin_va_list" on X86, and run it. Would I face any problem on run-time? I think it won't

Thanks for your answer very much. I wonder for what reason does ARM use *void ** but X86 use *char ** ? Seems ARM uses void * since its spec said that. But X86? I cannot find any reason or spec to specify why X86 uses char *, not void * directly? Could anyone give me some hints? Thanks a lot. 2011/5/23 John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> > On May 22, 2011, at 8:49 PM, Wenhan Gu wrote:

On May 22, 2011, at 8:49 PM, Wenhan Gu wrote: > I know __builtin_va_list is target-specific, and > ARM has typedef void* __builtin_va_list; > X86 has typedef char* __builtin_va_list; > > > It seems they can be treated as the same prototype,i.e.. void*, at the header level. > What I want to ask is: > > If I write a program use "typedef void*

Does anyone know what program can be used to query the RAID status from the OS for an on-board LSI SAS 2308-4i? On this page: http://docs.avagotech.com/docs/12351997 there is a curious note on the left that reads: "Integrated MegaRAID support available upon request" After one mostly fruitless round of chatting with LSI/Avago/Broadcom and one completely fruitless round of chatting

Hi，every one. This problem has been bothering me for several days.I really hope that you can help me. I want to add an trinsics in X86. This trinsics can compare two numbers and return the larger. There are the changes I do as fllowing. In /tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsX86.def : BUILTIN(__builtin_x86_max_qb, "iii", "") In include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsX86.td : let

On 1/30/2015 1:53 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/29/2015 05:07 AM, Jatin Davey wrote: >> Yes , it is a SATA disk. I am not sure of the speed. Can you tell me >> how to find out this information ? Additionally we are using RAID 10 >> configuration with 4 disks. > > What RAID controller are you using? > > # lspci | grep RAID [Jatin] [root at localhost ~]# lspci |

On Thursday 02 November 2017 14:10:25 Bowie Bailey wrote: > If you want raid 5 or 6, then you should get a hardware controller. For > raid 1, mdadm should work just fine.? I would suggest trying it before > buying a raid controller.? If it works for you, you save a few hundred > dollars and you have one less piece of hardware to worry about. > > I haven't looked at them in

I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have both drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is the state of the art in linux software monitoring for this? Long ago when that box was set up I think the best I could have done was a Java GUI tool that IBM had for their servers - and that seemed like

--------- Forwarded Message --------- From： Tianhao Shen <17862703959 at 163.com> Date： 11/14/2018 09:31 To： craig.topper at gmail.com <craig.topper at gmail.com> Subject： Re: [llvm-dev] How to define an instruction Hi, Craig Thank you for replying to me. I guess that you misunderstand my meaning about "can'r run". I just want to run my instruction by LLVM using the

Thank you for answering my confusion. I have another questions. If I add really instructions instead intrinsics ,can I reach my purpose? I guess ,the answer is "can't". I don't find the anything about how machine to do about instructions,especially "ALU" instructions. Thank you again, Tianhao Shen On 11/14/2018 13:42，Craig Topper<craig.topper at gmail.com>

hi, i tried a lot to setup icecastserver and ices on ubuntu. but failed. can you please show detaled installation and configuration steps for users along with best practices and recommendations. With Best -Ashwin. +91-9959166266 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20130223/a43c7b8d/attachment.htm