similar to: [LLVMdev] metadata

That's because instructions have a location associated with them, not a compile unit. -eric On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:46 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > I used DILocation instead of DICompileUnit and it works. Hmmm, interesting. > > George > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:33 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Here is

Here is the code. I am running on llvm 3.1 on Lion (Mac 10.7.4) *string getFileDirectory*(*const* Instruction &I){ MDNode *MD = I.getMetadata("dbg"); DICompileUnit compileUnit(MD); return compileUnit.getDirectory().str(); } George On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > Without knowing the code that you've written

Hmmm, but it has a getDirectory function. -G On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > That's because instructions have a location associated with them, not > a compile unit. > > -eric > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:46 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > > I used DILocation instead of DICompileUnit and

I used DILocation instead of DICompileUnit and it works. Hmmm, interesting. George On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:33 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > Here is the code. I am running on llvm 3.1 on Lion (Mac 10.7.4) > > *string getFileDirectory*(*const* Instruction &I){ > > MDNode *MD = I.getMetadata("dbg"); > > DICompileUnit

You should probably think of the DIFooBar constructors like reinterpret-casts, not "go find the thing I actually want" functions. If you hand DICompileUnit() a node that is not a compile-unit metadata node, it's not going to tell you that you goofed. If you _did_ have a CU metadata node, then DICompileUnit's getDirectory() would work just fine. But you don't. --paulr

Yeah, It looks like I am doing exactly what's in Dwarf*.cpp files, yet I am getting blanks. George On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:00 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > How does one get the directory of the compilation unit in llvm? > > I am using

Without knowing the code that you've written and the IR that you're running on I'm not sure what I can do to help you. -eric On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:32 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, It looks like I am doing exactly what's in Dwarf*.cpp files, yet I am > getting blanks. > > George > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Eric

Hi Guys, How does one get the directory of the compilation unit in llvm? I am using DICompileUnit but for some reason I am getting blanks for the directory name. Here is my code ... MDNode *MD = I.getMetadata("dbg"); DICompileUnit compileUnit(MD); *return* compileUnit.getDirectory().str(); Thanks George -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:00 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > How does one get the directory of the compilation unit in llvm? > I am using DICompileUnit but for some reason I am getting blanks > for the directory name. Here is my code ... > > MDNode *MD = I.getMetadata("dbg"); > > DICompileUnit compileUnit(MD); > > return

I mean an llvm Pass that transforms switch statements into if statements. For example, if I have code with switch statements then running the pass will convert all switches to ifs in the bytecode. George On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "George Baah" <georgebaah at gmail.com> > >

There is also the LowerSwitch pass that converts switch instructions to a sequence of branches. On May 6, 2013, at 1:24 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > I mean an llvm Pass that transforms switch statements into if statements. For example, if I have code with switch statements then running the pass will convert all switches to ifs in the bytecode. > > George

Hi Folks, Is a java frontend still being developed for llvm? George -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/95b28fc7/attachment.html>

Hi Guys, I am using the Postdom pass and I would like to get the root of the tree. However, everytime I try to get the root, I get a segfault. I don't know why the environment can't find DominatorTreeBase. Below is the code that generates the Segfault. In my .h file I include Dominators.h PDT.getRootNode(); //PDT is a reference to a PostDominatorTree dyld: lazy symbol binding

Thank you very much guys, I really appreciate your help. George On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Frits van Bommel <fvbommel at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:57 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > > I did M.getOrInsertFunction and called the exit function with . > > > > IRBuilder<> builder = IRBuilder<>(...); > >

On 26 July 2012 08:45, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > Is a java frontend still being developed for llvm? Closest thing I know is gcj + dragonegg, but it is a lot of work to be done in gcj before it works with dragonegg. > George > Cheers, Rafael

I did M.getOrInsertFunction and called the exit function with . IRBuilder<> builder = IRBuilder<>(...); Value *one = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(M.getContext()),1); builder.CreateCall(exitF,one,"tmp4"); "Instruction has a name, but provides a void value! %tmp4 = call void @exit(i32 1) Broken module found, compilation aborted! " On Thu, Mar 31,

Hi Joshua, I have a function foo and I want to insert exit(0) at the end of foo. The problem is M.getFunction returns null, which is understandable. I am not sure what to do. Below is the code snippet. void foo(int argc, char* argv[]) { printf("hello world\n"); exit(0); //***I want to insert this exit } My llvm code snippet is vector<const Type *> params =

Hi All, Is there a pass in llvm that converts switch statements to if statements? George -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130506/f06741c4/attachment.html>

Hi Everyone, I have an llvm project from which I am trying to call external libraries such as boost. For some reason, when I type make, llvm can't seem to find the header files to the library even though it's in the path. I am baffled by this. For example, for boost this is what I get: " fatal error: 'boost/lambda/lambda.hpp' file not found" Do I have to modify

Hi All, I am new to LLVM. I am trying to get the Hello example in "lib/Transform/Hello" to run. But when I do a make in the directory I get this error. I don't understand why it can't find these make files. ../../../Makefile.common:60: ../../../Makefile.config: No such file or directory ../../../Makefile.common:68: /Makefile.rules: No such file or directory Should i make