similar to: [LLVMdev] Problem using llvm::cl::bits class with gcc 4.7

Hi Daniel, Just in the moment you replied my message, I was rewriting it as I hadn't noticed it hadn't a correct format. Sorry for that and thanks for answering it anyway. > ./prog <option1> | ( <option2> --arg1 --arg2) | ( <option3> --arg1 ) > Yes, that is exactly what I need. It's a pity commandLine doesn't implement that possibility. So I will do what

Hi Daniel, I would like to go deeper with CommandLine and I was asking if you could help me again. Look, following the same example you put in the last message: ./prog <option1> | ( <option2> --arg1 --arg2) | ( <option3> --arg1 ) What I really really want is the same except I don't want the "--" prefix is present in any of the arguments. ./prog <option1>

On 10 May 2013 09:44, Pedro Delgado Perez <pedro.delgadoperez at mail.uca.es> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I would like to go deeper with CommandLine and I was asking if you could > help me again. > > Look, following the same example you put in the last message: > > ./prog <option1> | ( <option2> --arg1 --arg2) | ( <option3> --arg1 ) > > What I

Hi Daniel, Thanks for your answer. > I am considering fixing the bug in the LLVM CommandLine library but is > going to be a long time before I can look at it. So don't wait for me > to do that. > Ok, ok, but, if you end up fixing this, please keep me post. > If you are really desperate to have the command line options in the > way you want they you may need to implement

Hi, I've been trying to code through CommandLine the options I want my tool accepts, but I find find quite impossible to achieve robustly what I need. Look, I want the tool accepts a list of arguments in a particular order. For this goal, I know the cl::Positional flag. But, the problem is that the first argument must be one of a set of options. In my case, only the three next commands are

Hi,I've been trying to code through CommandLine the options I want my tool accepts, but I find quite impossible to achieve robustly what I need .Look, I want the tool accepts a list of arguments in a particular order. For this goal, I know the cl::Positional flag. But, the problem is that the first argument must be one of a set of options (like a kind of subcommand of the tool). In my case,

I've added some debugging flags to my register allocator here to turn on and off specific debug messages. I did this with llvm::cl::bits which allows me to turn on multiple options. But its kind of ugly because each option is independent as far as llvm is concerned and I have to prefix each option with something like RegallocDebug so users know what it's about. For example:

Hi, The klee library directory is determined at compile time and cannot be changed afterwards. Have a look at tools/klee/main.cpp to see how it is computed. I usually use Klee without any install step, right from the build directory. This has never given me the error you see. Hope this helps, Jonas On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu < alexandruionutdiaconescu at

Hello everyone, I am a novice with KLEE under LLVM. I am trying to build a KLEE project (on a new LLVM environment) and I have the following problem: echo Testing... Testing... echo There should be no assertion fails! There should be no assertion fails! klee -taint=direct taint_direct.o KLEE: output directory = "klee-out-8" klee: error: Cannot find linker input

Dear folks-- I always seem to find that I spend more than half my time making sure my input date is in the right form, properly aligned, with no bizarre features. You know the drill: five kinds of missing values, three of them documented. An alpha mistype in one numeric field turns 30,000 numbers into factor levels. SPSS conversion turns 250 factors nicely into R factors, except 3 have levels

Hello Please see the example below > class(testX) [1] "matrix" > class(testX[1,]) [1] "numeric" Why not matrix? What am I missing here? Is there a way to keep the same class? The reason for the question is that I want to implement a k-step ahead prediction for my own routines and R wrecks does not seem to like [1,] as shown below. >

Hi, Recently, I added some command line options to my pass like this: static llvm::cl::opt<MemMod> MemoryModel("mem-mod", llvm::cl::desc("Set the memory model:"), llvm::cl::values( clEnumVal(flat, "flat memory model"), clEnumVal(twodim, "two dimensional memory model"), clEnumValEnd)); This works

Hi all, I'm new to llvm and klee. Now I'm trying to build up coreutil with klee. Following the steps online (http://klee.llvm.org/TestingCoreutils.html), I went to step 3 and stuck. When I try to run: klee --libc=uclibc --posix-runtime ./cat.bc -version Error occurred like: klee: error: Cannot find linker input '/lib/libc.a' klee: ModuleUtil.cpp:42: llvm::Module*

Hi, I'm currently trying to find and fix memory leaks (compiling with ``-fsanitize=address``) in the KLEE tool [1] an having found some leaks and I'm having trouble suppressing them. I'm trying to suppress them using the ``-fsanitize-blacklist=blacklist.txt`` option as documented at [2]. I'm using Clang 3.7 ( Arch Linux package 3.7.0-6). The sort of reported leaks I see are ```

Hi, I have a question about using lm on matrix, have to admit it is very trivial but I just couldn't find the answer after searched the mailing list and other online tutorial. It would be great if you could help. I have a matrix "trainx" of 492(rows) by 220(columns) that is my x, and trainy is 492 by 1. Also, I have the newdata testx which is 240 (rows) by 220 (columns). Here is

Dear R-helper, How could I count only some variable was exist after running sample (random) function. For example, > testx <- factor(c("Game","Paper","Internet","Time","Money")) > for(i in 1:2) { + x <- sample(testx,replace=TRUE) + print(x) + } [1] Money Money Time Internet Time Levels: Game Internet

> Excuse me for the diversion but, is that interpreter of LLVM IR available > somewhere? Details on how it works, performance, etc? I'd be interested Yes it is available. The tool (KLEE [1]) is actually a lot more than an interpreter (although it can be used as one). KLEE allows you to mark certain variables (e.g. program inputs) as "symbolic". What this means is that the

Dear all, I am confused with the behaviour of survfit with newdata option. I am using the latest version R-2-15-0. In the simple example below I am building a coxph model on 90 patients and trying to predict 10 patients. Unfortunately the survival curve at the end is for 90 patients. Could somebody please from the survival package confirm that this behaviour is as expected or not - because I

All, For my understanding, I wanted to see if I can get glmnet predictions using both the predict function and also by multiplying coefficients by the variable matrix. This is not worked out. Could anyone suggest where I am going wrong? I understand that I may not have the mean/intercept correct, but the scaling is also off, which suggests a bigger mistake. Thanks for your help. Juliet Hannah

Dear Developers, I am a Master's student at the ECE department of the University of Florida, USA.​​ For my research project, supervised by Prof. Mark Tehranipoor<http://tehranipoor.ece.ufl.edu/> and Prof. Farimah Farahmandi<http://farimah.ece.ufl.edu/>, I need to use Clang LLVM DataflowSanitizer library in KLEE. However, I have faced some difficulties (explained below) while