similar to: [LLVMdev] Parsing C++ template parameters using cindex.py

I'd like to parse a C++ header file (say, math.h) with the Clang bindings for Python. (Yes, I know math.h is technically a C header, but for my purposes I want to pretend that it is C++.) For some reason, Clang is able to parse the file as C, but not as C++. Here is an example session: >>> import clang.cindex >>> idx = clang.cindex.Index.create() >>> tu =

Answering my own question: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Elliott Slaughter < elliottslaughter at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to parse a C++ header file (say, math.h) with the Clang bindings > for Python. (Yes, I know math.h is technically a C header, but for my > purposes I want to pretend that it is C++.) For some reason, Clang is able > to parse the file as C, but not

Hi Elliott, On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Elliott Slaughter <elliottslaughter at gmail.com> wrote: > Answering my own question: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Elliott Slaughter <elliottslaughter at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to parse a C++ header file (say, math.h) with the Clang bindings for Python. (Yes, I know math.h is technically a C header, but for my

Hello, I'm trying to use the python libclang bindings to write a C++ style-checker, and I'd like to detect all the typedefs to recommend switching to using. I'm using libclang 3.8, with the python bindings provided with it. When I parse a file with index = clang.cindex.Index.create() tu = index.parse(f, ['-x', 'c++', '-std=c++11', '-fsyntax-only',

On 11/14/2011 01:24 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: > Hi Tobias. > > I worked on enabling Polly accepting non affine memory accesses and I > produced a patch. Great. > I saw that there were a lot of updates in Polly recently, so I had to > redo a lot of the work I did and that slowed me quite a bit. Ups, sorry! However, I believe without these changes detecting non-affine memory

I'm in the process of finishing up the ocaml llvm bindings, and I had some last minute questions before we code freeze: 1. What version of ocaml is everyone using, and how old of an ocaml version do you need to support? 2. Would it be alright if I renamed some functions? Module providers are being removed for 2.7. I can keep the old functions around, but I'd prefer to keep the API clean.

2011/11/14 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>: > On 11/14/2011 01:24 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: >> >> Hi Tobias. >> >> I worked on enabling Polly accepting non affine memory accesses and I >> produced a patch. > > Great. > >> I saw that there were a lot of updates in Polly recently, so I had to >> redo a lot of the work I did and

Mmm I found out a very strange behavior (to me) of the SCEV analysis of the loop bound of the external loop I posted. When in ScopDetection it gets the SCEV of the external loop bound in the "isValidLoop()" function with: const SCEV *LoopCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L); It returns a SCEVCouldNotCompute, but if I change the "if" block inside the loop from: if

Hi Erick, Thanks for your patches! On Mar 4, 2008, at 01:33, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > This is a small bug fix for the ocaml build system that allows > for dependencies to be generated for ocaml interface files. I've committed the second half of this. > --- > bindings/ocaml/Makefile.ocaml | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git bindings/

On Thursday 18 February 2010 20:51:40 Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > I'm in the process of finishing up the ocaml llvm bindings, and I had > some last minute questions before we code freeze: > > 1. What version of ocaml is everyone using, and how old of an ocaml > version do you need to support? I'm on OCaml 3.11.1 but I have no preferences. > 2. Would it be alright if I

I'm trying to the FirstClass 6.011 conferencing system with Wine 20020804 - it will display the initial welcome screen and then the logging in window. However, it then terminates with the error messages below... Any ideas?!? Thanks, Ben wine "c:\program files\firstclass\fcc32.exe" fixme:accel:CreateAcceleratorTableA should check that the accelerator descriptions are valid,

On Feb 18, 2010, at 12:51, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > > I'm in the process of finishing up the ocaml llvm bindings, and I had > some last minute questions before we code freeze: > > 1. What version of ocaml is everyone using, and how old of an ocaml > version do you need to support? Still using OCaml 3.11.1, but will but upgrading to OCaml 3.11.2 around the same time as the

Hello Jianzhou, On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > Does 2.8 release plan to change anything in Ocaml bindings? > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew does not list any > relevant features. I usually wait until around nowish before a release to sync llvm-c and the ocaml bindings. I'll start the process.

This is a small bug fix for the ocaml build system that allows for dependencies to be generated for ocaml interface files. --- bindings/ocaml/Makefile.ocaml | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 7c62c2cd93a6402e5f6ebd600e9e3ac7851b4d29.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 994 bytes Desc: not

\tools\clang\tools\CIndex && D:\Tools\Building\cmake\bin\cmake.exe -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles\CIndex.dir\link.txt --verbose=1 D:\Tools\Building\gcc\bin\g++.exe -shared -o ..\..\..\..\bin\libCIndex.dll -Wl,--out-implib,..\..\..\..\lib\libCIndex.dll.a -Wl,--major-image-version,0,--minor-image-version,0 CMakeFiles\CIndex.dir\CIndex.cpp.obj ..\..\..\..\lib\libLLVMMC.a

On Apr 7, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Talin wrote: > > OK I've been checking this out some more, and the DIEs don't look valid to me. Take a look at this output from dwarfdump -v: > > 0x000000c7: TAG_subprogram [3] > 0x000000c8: AT_name( .debug_str[0x000001bd] = "construct" ) > 0x000000cc: AT_MIPS_linkage_name( .debug_str[0x000001c7] =

Hi, Does 2.8 release plan to change anything in Ocaml bindings? http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew does not list any relevant features. 2.7 added 'operand' that can access each operand from a value. external operand : llvalue -> int -> llvalue = "llvm_operand" Does this binding also expose a primitive to return how many operands a given value has? I need

Hi, I'm trying to debug a function I wrote to calculate the cindex for a hierarchical tree. For this it is useful to compare my calculations with those in output from the clustindex function, in the cclust library. There's no way, however, to have the cindex value for a given output of the cclust function, as a NA value is always returned. This happens almost surely because the cindex in

On 06/25/2012 12:50 AM, Mihai Basa wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there a reason why the library location code in cindex py does not > use find_library() to locate libclang, like in the attached patch? > > Without it there were problems locating a versioned libclang.so.1 file > on Debian, for example. Hi Mihai, as this is a clang related question, I move your mail to the clang

Hello all, Is there a reason why the library location code in cindex py does not use find_library() to locate libclang, like in the attached patch? Without it there were problems locating a versioned libclang.so.1 file on Debian, for example. Cheers, Mihai -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: