similar to: [LLVMdev] Stuck on linking llc on ARM

"陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)" <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> writes: > I have been stuck on compiling LLVM/Clang (r163485) on pandaboard which has > following configuration, > > - Ubuntu 11.04 + 1G Mem + 1G Swap + 32G SD card > - GCC 4.5.2 > - GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.21.0.20110327) 1.11 > > The compiling process stucks on linking llc, I am pretty

Hi Óscar, On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:45:23AM +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > "陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)" <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> writes: > > > I have been stuck on compiling LLVM/Clang (r163485) on pandaboard which has > > following configuration, > > > > - Ubuntu 11.04 + 1G Mem + 1G Swap + 32G SD card > > - GCC 4.5.2 > > - GNU gold

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:45:23AM +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > "陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)" <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> writes: > > > I have been stuck on compiling LLVM/Clang (r163485) on pandaboard which has > > following configuration, > > > > - Ubuntu 11.04 + 1G Mem + 1G Swap + 32G SD card > > - GCC 4.5.2 > > - GNU gold (GNU

Hi all, Since the 3.1 testing day is coming and be a ARM tester, I would like to make sure everything is O.K. so that we don't waste the precious time. As discussed on the ML before, I plan to cross compile LLVM/Clang first, then run regression test and test suite on the pandaboards. Could someone help me check to see if I miss something? Thanks! Here is the pandaboard configuration,

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:13 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi all, > > Since the 3.1 testing day is coming and be a ARM tester, I would like to > make > sure everything is O.K. so that we don't waste the precious time. As > discussed > on the ML before, I plan to cross compile LLVM/Clang first, then run > regression > test and test suite on

Hi all, I'm one of the developers of the Jade project, a Jit decoder running with LLVM 2.9. We are currently testing our decoder on a pandaboard<http://pandaboard.org/> based on an OMAP 4430 and the Jit compilation seems to crash once there is a call to a function in the LLVM IR. We have already tested this issue with lli in its 2.9 version, and this bug still stays the same. LLVM

Hi David, > | David, do you build LLVM/Clang in what mode? Now I use "--enable-optimized" option to make a Release+Asserts build, LLVM/Clang get built finally... > Unfortunately I don't have any silver bullets. I'm using a Pandaboard with 1G of memory and 1G of swap, with as little other stuff running. Definitely don't build with debug symbols unless you are

Hi Chris, > The right place to implement this is in lib/Support/Host.cpp. X86 has an implementation of sys::getHostCPUName(), but everything else just uses the: > > std::string sys::getHostCPUName() { > return "generic"; > } > > implementation. I tried to let it return "armv7l" or "cortex-a9" on pandaboard, but the bitcode output by clang

> Yep, this is the issue. Running on an ARM pandaboard I can confirm that it's > due > to issues with the old JIT in general which are fixed in MCJIT, and nothing > to do > with the profiling code being tested, as discussed in this thread: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120910/150406. > html I don't see this patch get

Hi Andrew, On 18/09/12 11:21, David Tweed wrote: > in particular there are some regression tests of interesting things > -- such as profiling -- that fail purely because the default old JIT > doesn't work. |I've actually got LLVM currently compiling within an ARM QEmu install to |look at an assert within the ARM JIT code. Profiling tests that I |submitted a few weeks ago are

> By the way, we are looking for ARM testers. There was a lot of interest in the 3.0 release for an ARM release. We will try to do one this release on a trial basis. We are looking for ARMv7 cortex-a8 and cortex-a9 on Linux. We have two pandard board (ARMv7 cortex-a9) and perhaps one ARMv6 4-cores board. Do we do a native compile or cross compile for the ARM platform? Regards, chenwj --

> Ubuntu on ARM is softfp, right? How about testing hardfp with a > distribution like ArchLinuxArm? Yes, Ubuntu on ARM is softfp. But I already told Bill the platform I prepare to test and the testing day begins *tomorrow*, I prefer what it likes now. BTW, what if I use a cross compiler with hardfp enabled to compile LLVM first, then run it on Ubuntu/ARM? Does it achieve your goal, too?

IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT! We will be branching for the 3.1 release on April 16th! :-) This gives us a little over two weeks to get the trees into the most stable condition we can. What this means for you: All major features for the 3.1 release should be finished or near completion by the April 16th. After April 16th, we will accept only bug fixes and patches which do not change the

On May 11, 2012, at 12:25 AM, James Molloy wrote: > On 11/05/12 04:56, 陳韋任 wrote: >>> I've just filed PR12794: Add ARM cpu / subtarget features auto-detection. And I would very much appreciate the community's help to implement this. >>> >>> What motivated this? Well this: >>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA5OTM

Hi all, I think it's Gentoo's bug, but I want to know if anyone has the same issue here. I am compiling LLVM trunk on Gentoo (gcc 4.5.2), and I get error message below, --- make[4]: Entering directory `/nfs_home/chenwj/llvm-3.1/svn/build/tools/clang/lib/Frontend' llvm[4]: Compiling InitHeaderSearch.cpp for Release+Asserts build

On 11/05/12 04:56, 陳韋任 wrote: >> I've just filed PR12794: Add ARM cpu / subtarget features auto-detection. And I would very much appreciate the community's help to implement this. >> >> What motivated this? Well this: >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA5OTM >> >> I believe one of the reason the benchmark numbers are totally

Hello, I asked here for kind of reference GCC version which LLVM development team is using for *native* testing on ARM hardware. (no cross compilation!) last week or so. I've been curious myself how the situation looks and so I tested LLVM 2.9 as a reference point and LLVM HEAD as of June 29 on ARMv7 (two boards with two different Ubuntu versions) compiled by GCC 4.3.4, 4.4.1, 4.4.5,

Hi Sergey, > This is a known gcc bug > (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53670). GCC 4.5 can't > compile clang 3.1 are you sure? I built the LLVM/clang-3.1 release binaries for ubuntu 64 bits using gcc-4.5. Ciao, Duncan. > > On 13 September 2012 06:53, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I think

Hi. This is a known gcc bug (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53670). GCC 4.5 can't compile clang 3.1 On 13 September 2012 06:53, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi all, > > I think it's Gentoo's bug, but I want to know if anyone has the same > issue here. I am compiling LLVM trunk on Gentoo (gcc 4.5.2), and I get > error

Hello, A new clang builder added to osusl buildbot: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 It's pandaboard with cortex-a9 runnibg Ubuntu 11.04. It builds Ok, but few test fail and need attention. Please take a look and let me know if someone will need more information or intermediate files to fix that. Thanks Galina