similar to: [LLVMdev] LLC always has a tab?

I forgot to mention, the generated file that has the tab is VPOGenAsmWriter.inc. On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:43 PM, ryan baird <ryanrbaird at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm building a target for the intermediate language of another compiler. > The other intermediate language is close to an assembly language (RTL, 1 > operation per line), so I based my target off of the Mips target.

Ryan, I've always been bothered by this tab character that doesn't come from the target. The line you're looking for I believe is from /utils/TableGen/AsmWriterEmitter.cpp at line 428. In my opinion the target should control whether a prefix is printed before an instruction. Thanks, Javier From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of ryan

I'm working on building a target for llvm that's the intermediate language of another compiler, so that the other compiler can benifit from llvm's optimization passes. I essentially made a copy of the mips backend, and then started changing the output to match the intermediate language of the compiler. Most of the output can be overriden, but I haven't figured out how to change

I am compiling the following code for the MIPS architecture: unsigned char trunc(float f) { return (unsigned char) f; } and it produces the following assembly (directives removed for convenience: trunc: trunc.w.s $f0, $f12 mfc1 $2, $f0 jr $ra nop However, this does not seem to produce the correct output for negative numbers. When I run the following code, I get

> > I didn't realize the code was undefined, I'll let my professor know; but > for code comparison purposes we're still seeking advice on producing the > output that matches the other compilers (even if it involves doing a > translation on the .ll file or additional translation to the produced > assembly). We can't fairly compare the code if it doesn't do the

I just accidently sent a partially complete email, so this contains the rest (sorry!) I'm working on translating llvm's optimized intermediate code to another compiler's intermediate code, and I'm working on the PHI instruction. Here's an example phi instruction to help explain what I'm trying to do: %inc25 = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] What I would want to

2012/9/9 ryan baird <ryanrbaird at gmail.com>: > I'm working on building a target for llvm that's the intermediate language > of another compiler, so that the other compiler can benifit from llvm's > optimization passes. > > I essentially made a copy of the mips backend, and then started changing the > output to match the intermediate language of the compiler.

Esentially, I'm working on a translator someone started building for llvm2.9 that translates an optimized .lln file to another intermediate language, and I'm porting it to 3.1. There is a new intrinsic that pops up in our test cases' lln files that never used to, llvm.lifetime.start. I looked up the description: "The 'llvm.lifetime.start' intrinsic specifies the start of

Is there a pass I can use after reg2mem to get rid of occurances like this?: store i32 %cond, i32* %cond.reg2mem %cond.reload = load i32* %cond.reg2mem store i32 %cond.reload, i32* %cond4.reg2mem Essentially, in this case, reg2mem creates an extra memory space to store and load a value from just here, and never uses the value again; since this isn't efficient code, I'm wondering if

I'm working on a target based on the MIPS target, and when I copy f64 values into 32 bit registers for calling functions, I need the operation to work on a of 32 bit registers (because the language I'm translating to isn't actually mips). I've been looking at how to do this, but I haven't been able to figure it out. Since the Mips target code is still really close to mine,

I was reading about the order of optimizations in the code generation stage here: http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#the-high-level-design-of-the-code-generator This is the part that's interesting to me: 3. SSA-based Machine Code Optimizations<http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#ssa-based-machine-code-optimizations>— This optional stage consists of a series of machine-code

I'm working on translating llvm's optimized intermediate code to another compiler's intermediate code, and I'm working on the PHI instruction. Here's an example phi instruction to help explain what I'm trying to do: %inc25 = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] What I would want to do here is allocate some memory memory (i'm trying to use %phi1 = alloca i32,

Ryan, I don't think I fully understand the problem you described, but please see the comments below. Hope this helps you solve the problem. On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:18 PM, ryan baird <ryanrbaird at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm working on a target based on the MIPS target, and when I copy f64 > values into 32 bit registers for calling functions, I need the operation to > work

I'm translating llvm's intermediate representation, after optimization, to the intermediate representation of another optimizer. One of the problems I've run into is that llvm sometimes (although rarely) produces strangely sized integers after an opt pass with -O3 (in this example, 832 bits). I need to use 8, 16, or 32 bit integers for the other intermediate language. In short,

Hi all, Well, suggestion for workarounds for the namespace problems are welcome... this is a 7 minutes compile files on a pentium 4 3ghz 700Mb ram... The fatal error at the end MAY depend on the previous... or at least, I hope so. cl /nologo /TP /EHsc /GR /Zi /Yd /D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS /DHAVE__FINITE_IN_FLOAT_H /DHAVE__ISNAN_IN_FLOAT_H /ISTLport-4.6.2\stlport /Illvm\inc lude

struct X86AsmPrinter is in an anonymous namespace, but printInstruction is declared in namespace llvm. try editing the tablegen output to move X86AsmPrinter::printInstruction into an anonymous namespace, not llvm. I suspect this will at least fix the first problem. Then we can figure out the proper longterm fix. Andrew On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 03:56, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > Hi all, >

Hi, LLVMers, I notice that there are two versions of printInstruction() generated by tablegen: (1) XXXInstPrinter::printInstruction(const MCInst *MI, raw_ostream &os), like for X86. (2) XXXAsmPrinter::printInstruction(const MachineInstr *MI, raw_ostream &os), like for Sparc. I guess Sparc backend directly transform MachineInstr objects into ostream, while X86 backend convert

Just saw that, as well. After running the commands to enable SMB2 & SMB3 and rebooting...no luck. Will keep searching for other registry settings. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:27 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com < lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/19/2016 3:24 PM, Bill Baird wrote: > > When I search for "smb2", I get nothing in my log file for the NT1 limited >

I'm seeing the exact same behavior in my environment (NT4 PDC, not AD). I had to downgrade samba get systems working again. The full error message is: "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed". Did you have any luck finding a solution?

On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 10:51:25 -0400 Bill Baird via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I ran the same thing with 4.8.5 and it work without any issues: > > Adding groups > Importing groups > Committing 'add groups' transaction to disk > Adding users > Importing users > Committing 'add users' transaction to disk > Adding users to groups >