similar to: [LLVMdev] Announcement: Version 2012.2 of LLBMC available

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Carsten Sinz <carsten.sinz at kit.edu> wrote: > Perhaps some of you might be interested in this: > -- Carsten > > > ################################################################## > > *---------------------------------------------------* > * LLBMC: The Low-Level Bounded Model Checker * > * for C (and C++)

Perhaps some of you might be interested in this: -- Carsten ################################################################## *---------------------------------------------------* * LLBMC: The Low-Level Bounded Model Checker * * for C (and C++) programs is now available! * * Version 2012.1 * *

This looks very interesting. Do you plan to make the source code publicly available? -Hal On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 01:58 +0100, Carsten Sinz wrote: > Perhaps some of you might be interested in this: > -- Carsten > > > > > ################################################################## > > > *---------------------------------------------------* > *

We are very pleased to announce that a new version of LLBMC is available for download at http://llbmc.org. LLBMC is a high-precision static analyzer based on LLVM implementing a technique called "Bounded Model Checking". LLBMC can detect errors such as: - Illegal memory accesses (e.g., buffer overflows) - Integer overflows - Division by zero - Invalid bit shifts - Double frees

Hi, I'm a contributor to the KLEE project (based on LLVM) and I'm currently looking at trying to add the following functionality to KLEE... (1). Be able to iterate through registered command line options and programmatically hide them. We're interested in this because we wish to hide (unless -help-hidden is called) several LLVM options. (2). Be able to place an option into a category

Dear All, I'm getting the following error on Mac OS X when compiling C++ code in the LLVM test suite: g++ Output/minisat.llc.s -o Output/minisat.llc -lm -m64 -fomit-frame-pointer -mdynamic-no-pic -lstdc++ -lm Output/minisat.llc.s:5:Unknown pseudo-op: .cfi_startproc Output/minisat.llc.s:8:Unknown pseudo-op: .cfi_def_cfa_offset Output/minisat.llc.s:8:Rest of line ignored. 1st junk

LLBMC http://llbmc.org uses bounded model checking technique to find errors in LLVM IR.Model checking is essentially search, and since LLBMC is bounded, the search for errors is usuallyincomplete, hence the approach may not verify the entire program, however, it may be goodenough to find interesting errors. Best wishes,Andrew On Monday, 8 February 2016, 21:54, Scott Santucci via llvm-dev

Hi, > I'm trying to run some of the test suite using the instructions here: > > http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#quicktestsuite > > I've built llvm myself, but I'm using pre-built binaries of llvm-gcc > (from http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/llvm-gcc4.2-2.5-x86-linux-RHEL4.tar.gz). > > Here's what happens: the llvm testsuite (from svn, right?) uses

I'm trying to run some of the test suite using the instructions here: http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#quicktestsuite I've built llvm myself, but I'm using pre-built binaries of llvm-gcc (from http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/llvm-gcc4.2-2.5-x86-linux-RHEL4.tar.gz). Here's what happens: foad at debian:~/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk$ ./configure

I'd just like to thank everyone who replied on this; the suggestions and resources are very helpful! ~Scott On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Andrew Santosa <santosa_1999 at yahoo.com> wrote: > LLBMC http://llbmc.org uses bounded model checking technique to find > errors in LLVM IR. > Model checking is essentially search, and since LLBMC is bounded, the > search for errors

Tanya Lattner wrote: > Many of you are probably wondering about the status of the 2.3 > release. Unfortunately, this release has been very difficult and the > list of regressions very high. The list has finally dwindled down to > the following regressions: > > Linux/x86: > SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench [ JIT Codegen, JIT] Increasing ulimit to 230 Mb (from

This nightly tester is now using an llvm-g++ that produces the new ODR linkage types. This means that many more functions are being considered by the inter-procedural optimization passes (for example, "linkonce" functions defined in a header). The result seems to be pretty huge swings (both good and bad) in the C++ tests in the testsuite, see below. Note that this tester is often

Many of you are probably wondering about the status of the 2.3 release. Unfortunately, this release has been very difficult and the list of regressions very high. The list has finally dwindled down to the following regressions: Linux/x86: SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench [ JIT Codegen, JIT] MultiSource/Applications/minisat/minisat [CBE] Darwin/x86:

First, thanks for testing the release. A couple comments. > === Summary === > > # of expected passes 2519 > # of unexpected failures 1 > # of expected failures 7 > gmake[1]: *** [check-local] Error 1 > > The unexpected failure was: > Running /home/llvm/llvm-2.2/test/CFrontend/dg.exp ... > FAIL:

Ok, I have good news! Thanks for the help! On Jun 2, 2008, at 11:11 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > Many of you are probably wondering about the status of the 2.3 > release. Unfortunately, this release has been very difficult and > the list of regressions very high. The list has finally dwindled > down to the following regressions: > > Linux/x86: >

Hi, In trying to build R 1.9.0, I ran into a problem building the x11() device support under XFree86 4.4.0: make[4]: Entering directory `/home/john/build/R-1.9.0/src/modules/X11' gcc -I. -I../../../src/include -I../../../src/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fPIC -g -O2 -c dataentry.c -o dataentry.lo In file included from dataentry.c:31:

Perhaps you noticed that LLVM gained a new optimizing register allocator yesterday (r130568). Linear scan is going away, and RAGreedy is the new default for optimizing builds. Hopefully, you noticed because your binaries were suddenly 2% smaller and 10% faster*. Some noticed because LLVM started crashing or miscompiling their code. Greedy replaces a fairly big chunk of the code generator, so

Hi, We are developing a bounded model checker for C/C++ programs (http://baldur.iti.kit.edu/llbmc/) that operates on LLVM's intermediate representation. While checking a C++ program that uses STL containers we noticed that llvm-gcc and clang handle pointer differences in disagreeing ways. Consider the following C function: int f(int *p, int *q) { return q - p; } Here's the

Hi Stephan, > We are developing a bounded model checker for C/C++ programs > (http://baldur.iti.kit.edu/llbmc/) that operates on LLVM's intermediate > representation. While checking a C++ program that uses STL containers > we noticed that llvm-gcc and clang handle pointer differences in > disagreeing ways. > > Consider the following C function: > int f(int *p, int *q)

Hi all, I wich to use EASYMAIL a Thrane&Thrane program to send/receive mail through a minisat-c satellite transceiver. Unfortunately, the manufacturer of this transceiver must be one of Bill Gate's friend and the program to communicate with it is windows only. http://www.thrane.com/maritime/products/satellite%20communication/inmarsat-c/easymail.aspx Therefore, I would like to run it in