similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM Lab had network issues

The SVN mirror is back up and running. Please let me know if you would see any issues. Thanks for your patience. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > A quick update. > > The SVN mirror got corrupted by r297634. Svnsync does not like huge > commits. > I'm in the middle of restoring and synch-ing up the mirror. Too soon to

On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote: > The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report" is no longer empty. Does anyone know what fixed them? Ciao, Duncan. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday,

This issue is back: FNT bots are reporting success in spite of tests failing, and the "report" text is empty again. Did someone change something? Ciao, Duncan. On 12/12/12 07:53, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote: >> The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. > > The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report"

The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. Thanks Galina -----Original Message----- From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:42 AM To: Galina Kistanova Cc: Duncan Sands; llvm-lab-wg at lists.minormatter.com; Galina Kistanova; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed On Tue,

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. > Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. > Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the

Hello everyone, It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different... I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and

Hello everyone, The SVN mirror in the LLVM Lab seems behind with the changes. I'm looking at the issue. Thank you for understanding. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170313/a48d639d/attachment.html>

Hi Galina, I seem to be having trouble connecting to the llvm lab using my existing pubkey. ("Permission denied (publickey)". The machine running the GDB 7.5 test suite has been failing recently due to a valid change that seems to only break under GCC 4.6, which is no longer a supported compiler for LLVM. If you could restore my access to the lab (or help me debug it - I may've

Hi Paula, This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x apparently does not have that method. The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems so so far. That should not prevent your bot from connecting. Thanks Galina On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paula Askar <paulatoth at google.com> wrote: > Hey Andrzej, > > What are you seeing

Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at our end? http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang -Andrzej On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote: > They are online now -

I’ve had another look, and some of the failing tests don’t use temporary files, so I don’t think this is a case of tests having side-effects. Instead, I’ve noticed that in the build log (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/6552/steps/build-unified-tree/logs/stdio), llvm-tblgen.exe is built (my patch modified it), but the table-generation steps of the

Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be > a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress

Hello everyone, Access Softek now offers 24/7 support for the LLVM Lab. If any code owner needs to resolve something related to the LLVM Lab, he/she can call the 24/7 Access Softek Technical Support line. The call will be escalated as required. The phone number in the United States is 1-818-431-5850. Please mention LLVM Lab and explain the issue. During normal west coast business hours please

It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits < cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and looks good. > > Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production buildbot to the new >

google5 is up, i'm just working on copying the buildmaster config. If you want to move it to lab.llvm, that's fine too. On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > May be google1 build master cold be moved to lab.llvm.org machines? > Do anybody use it? > > Thanks > > Galina > > > > On

Hi Danny, Could you send me the local.cfg from the original buildmaster with the buildslave names and passwords, please? Thanks Galina On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Berlin <dannyb at google.com> wrote: > Sure, i'm fine with it :) > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: >> Danny, >> >> lab.llvm.org

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will > need more love and care. > > Please let me

On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > I applied it and reconfigured the master. Thanks Galina! Marco, the build is complaining about Ninja: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-bpf-build/builds/414/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "Ninja" Now I remember we used ninja by

Thanks, Galina. It doesn't explain why the test worked on some bots but not this one, but Justin's workaround is okay with me. --paulr From: Galina Kistanova [mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 10:09 AM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: Davide Italiano; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Problem with 'sed' on one Windows bot? There is nothing

Hi Galina, The failing build was http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-mips/builds/10220 and the commit that caused it was 'r251331 [compiler-rt] Fix ptrace interceptor for aarch64'. ________________________________ From: Galina Kistanova [gkistanova at gmail.com] Sent: 02 November 2015 16:03 To: Daniel Sanders Cc: Renato Golin; Bill Seurer; LLVM Dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev]