similar to: [LLVMdev] A script for updating all the nested git clients

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] A script for updating all the nested git clients"

2012 Aug 29
0
[LLVMdev] A script for updating all the nested git clients
How about fitting Android's repo? :D I have not used repo for llvm, but been using my synthesized repository (for my buildbot). https://github.com/chapuni/llvm-project https://github.com/chapuni/llvm-project-submodule ...Takumi
2011 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] --enable-shared doesn't build shared library any more
In r134967 it still worked, and in r137742 it now doesn't. I used such flags: --enable-assertions --enable-shared --enable-libffi --enable-debug-runtime --enable-debug-symbols --disable-optimized Before build would create directory tools/llvm-shlib under the build tree. Now it is missing. Yuri
2012 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] r157890 - /cfe/trunk/unittests/Tooling/ToolingTest.cpp
012/6/3 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: >> Author: chapuni >> Date: Sat Jun  2 10:34:26 2012 >> New Revision: 157890 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157890&view=rev >> Log: >> Revert r157819, "#ifdef out a broken test on win32" >> >> FYI, LLVM_ON_WIN32 is useless. > > Can you be more specific? I
2011 Mar 16
3
[LLVMdev] [release_29] Good status of ppc-redhat-linux on Fedora 12 PS3
Good morning. LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. On RC1, only one test failed. test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. (I don't mention clang tests :p ) ...Takumi Fedora release 12 (Constantine) Linux speedking.localdomain 2.6.32.23-170.fc12.ppc64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 27 17:09:35 UTC 2010 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux llvm
2011 Apr 21
5
[LLVMdev] Dragonegg Git mirror?
Chen, Teemu is asking "the official git mirror" and he oughta know where the svn repo is. ;) Teemu, I have created an unofficial one; https://github.com/chapuni/dragonegg Excuse me, I might not update it so frequently. Anton, please provide us the official dragonegg.git! ...Takumi
2012 Jun 03
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] r157890 - /cfe/trunk/unittests/Tooling/ToolingTest.cpp
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:15:09 +0900 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > 012/6/3 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > >> Author: chapuni > >> Date: Sat Jun  2 10:34:26 2012 > >> New Revision: 157890 > >> > >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157890&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Revert r157819,
2011 Mar 16
0
[LLVMdev] [release_29] Good status of ppc-redhat-linux on Fedora 12 PS3
On Mar 15, 2011, at 7:25 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: > Good morning. > Hi Nakamura, > LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. > Hooray! :-) > On RC1, only one test failed. > test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll > Eric commented that this should be fixed on the release branch right now. > On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. Woo! :-) >
2012 Apr 04
2
[LLVMdev] "make check" fails at CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll (r153997 on PPC)
Hi, CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll is really generic test? $ make check llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/test' Making a new site.exp file... Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest 'lit.site.cfg' file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 1024000 ; \
2011 Mar 16
0
[LLVMdev] Prevent unbounded memory consuption of long lived JIT processes
Good morning Jose, Thank you to send patches. - Please send patches to llvm-commits. - Please make patches with "--attach". You may add "format.attach" to git config. I have not seen yours yet, but I pushed yours to github; https://github.com/chapuni/LLVM/compare/ed4edf9e...jfonseca%2F20110316 (Excuse me I could not input accent) ...Takumi On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:15
2012 Apr 16
1
[LLVMdev] "make check" fails at CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll (r153997 on PPC)
Ping, NAKAMURA san, thank you. Bill san, can you comment this commit? r154798 still fails on ppc32-lnux b/c *only* for this test. Loving more minor arch, the world will be better... 2012/04/04 23:26 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>: > Kimura san, > > You may ask committer of r153706. I wonder if it could be x86-independent. > >>
2012 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] "make check" fails at CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll (r153997 on PPC)
Kimura san, You may ask committer of r153706. I wonder if it could be x86-independent. > /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/Release/bin/llc: > error auto-selecting target for module 'No available targets are > compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.'. >  Please use the -march option to explicitly pick a target. ...Takumi as
2014 Sep 10
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] SVN infrastructure woes
> But I don't think there's a reason we couldn't point the bots at the github > mirrors. I'm not sure if they lag the official mirror though. The GitHub mirrors located at [1] are updated hourly which is not frequent enough There seems to be an LLVM organisation registered on GitHub but it doesn't seem to be in use. [1] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/ [2]
2012 Sep 12
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r160610 - /llvm/trunk/lib/ExecutionEngine/TargetSelect.cpp
Andy, Yes, it was wrong, as long as RemoteTarget is available for the target. If you would revert it, please consider then; - non-MCJIT stuff - Running different environment on the JIT e.g.) --build=--host=i686-linux --target=x86_64-linux - Host-incapable target on the JIT e.g.) --build=--host=x86_64-linux ---target=i686-mingw32 If JIT is unavailable for the default target, tests
2017 Apr 24
2
i686-mingw32-RA-on-linux buildbot
I keep running into errors on the i686-mingw32-RA-on-linux bot and was curious if someone could test a patch against the bot or something with a similar setup. I believe it should now work properly, but would like to make sure that it'll pass before possibly adding a third commit/revert cycle. If the history isn't an issue, let me know an I'll just keep trying. The differential is
2014 Feb 22
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.org/perf error 500
Hi Chris, llvm.org/perf gives again error 500s. I remember you had a look the last time. Would you mind looking again? Also, is there something which we could do to make LNT more robust. Do you have an idea what the last issue was about? Thanks, Tobias -------- Original Message -------- Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on polly-perf-O3-polly-scev-codegen-isl Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:08:44
2014 Feb 27
3
[LLVMdev] Understanding some of the recent cmake build changes
I was a bit confused with what the difference was between the old target_link_libraries(foo bar) and the new target_link_libraries(foo INTERFACE|PRIVATE|PUBLIC bar) To try to find out, I decided to look at the generated build.ninja. The difference that shows up is far fewer order only dependencies. For example build lib/TableGen/CMakeFiles/LLVMTableGen.dir/Error.cpp.o: CXX_COMPILER
2011 Jun 30
1
[LLVMdev] Introduction to git-bisect with "llvm-project.git"
Hello guys, I am making a submodule-based metaproject "llvm-project.git" for bisecting clang. I will introduce it to help you developers. Unfortunately, submodule is not useful to manage your branches. :/ Have fun! ...Takumi Instructions; 1. fetch two scripts from git://github.com/chapuni/llvm-project-scripts.git - hooks/post-merge - hooks/post-checkout 2. git clone
2011 Apr 20
2
[LLVMdev] Dragonegg Git mirror?
Is there an official Git mirror for Dragonegg? Cannot find the URL with Google nor with guesswork. Teemu
2011 Apr 21
0
[LLVMdev] Dragonegg Git mirror?
> Is there an official Git mirror for Dragonegg? Cannot find the URL with Google > nor with guesswork. Dragonegg has svn. http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
2012 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] git branch release_31
Hi Anton, git-svn got confused at the branch point for the release_31: I see that the current release_31 branch has been created on r155051 as a copy of r155050 from trunk, and r155050 is actually removing an older release_31 branch: Revision 155050 Author: void Date: Wed Apr 18 16:38:33 2012 CDT (11 days, 20 hours ago) Log Message: Removing old release_31 branch for rebranching. This