similar to: [LLVMdev] GlobalVariable initializer using from beyond the grave

Hi, I would like to run the -O1 pass sequence followed by -reg2mem from an out of tree project which uses llvm. I am using the following code snippet to do so but in some cases, my method is also vectorising the code, which doesn't happen when running the same sequence(-S -O1 -reg2mem) through opt. Can someone please help me find what I am missing? Thanks, Akash. *

Hi, I'm trying to use exception control by LLVM. In the demo page, I got : declare i8* @llvm.eh.exception() nounwind But, when a try to emit the code by llvm engine, the name is generate with the sufix .132 ( llvm.eh.exception.132 ) and the Function::getIntrinsicID abort the program. It was so : Intrinsic::getDeclaration(llvm_module,Intrinsic::memset,&Tys,1); Now, it's

Hi Ben, That did help. I continue to notice the virtual register in the program. I use LLVM 3.4. The program i am looking at is a very simple one. Listed below int global_var; int *global_ptr; int32_t main(int32_t argc, char ** argv){ int p = 10; int k = 20; int *pp; char *c_pp; pp = &k; global_ptr = pp; pp = &p; global_ptr = &global_var; return 0; } BR/Nizam

> In any case when you > want to obtain a base pointer to a "derived" object (where derivation > is implemented as you showed - with nesting) it's simply a matter of > using getelementptr to obtain a pointer to the nested base object and > using that. Umm ok, but i've the strange feeling that i'm missing something.. First a simple question: getelementptr with

Hi Devang, On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > In your example, you do not need to update debug info for @global_var at the moment. We are not identifying tls in debug info yet. Does that mean I will not be able to debug applications which use tls through gdb if they are build with gcc-lllvm or clang. > On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:30 AM, shankha

This is from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48360685/no-targets-in-targetregistry I have the following code, which should get the default llvm::Target. auto const targetTriple = llvm::sys::getDefaultTargetTriple(); llvm_module.setTargetTriple(targetTriple); std::string error; auto const * target = llvm::TargetRegistry::lookupTarget(targetTriple, error); if (target ==

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield.org> wrote: > As all of these transforms are 1-to-1, can we still support the older metadata and convert it on the fly? > I'd prefer not to keep all of that code around to interpret both versions without a very good reason. -eric > Alex > >> On Oct 13, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith

In your example, you do not need to update debug info for @global_var at the moment. We are not identifying tls in debug info yet. On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:30 AM, shankha wrote: > I do not face any issues debugging my test case. But while debugging > my application > through gdb I cannot make sense of the call stack. I do not see the > function names in > the call stack (with or

On Oct 13, 2010, at 10:09 AM, shankha wrote: > Hi Devang, > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: >> In your example, you do not need to update debug info for @global_var at the moment. We are not identifying tls in debug info yet. > > Does that mean I will not be able to debug applications which use tls > through gdb if they

Hi everyone, I have some problems with gettings the X86_thiscall calling convention to work. I am new to LLVM, so if this is the wrong place for this question then I appologise, please tell me where to go instead. I am generating code to call a member function of a class compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ using the JIT compiler. The following code is used to register the pointer to the

Hello everyone, i’m using LLVM (updated to 3.1 after seeing that bug, but it’s the same with 3.0) for running a bitcode on a C++ program, and Clang for compiling it. My code work perfectly, as expected on x64, but crash on x86. I’m on Windows 7 x64 and LLVM + Clang was compiled using Visual Studio 2010 (tested in both Release and Debug build). Project was make using CMake. Here is my code:

Hi For a research project at my university, I'm working on incorporating JIT in Prolog, which is basically an interpreted virtual machine. The VM uses logical units of functionality called 'predicates' which are composed of bytecode that represents the machine instructions the VM supports. At execution time, the VM infinitately loops over these bytecodes and, using a giant switch

In r219010, I merged integer and string fields into a single header field. By reducing the number of metadata operands used in debug info, this saved 2.2GB on an `llvm-lto` bootstrap. I've done some profiling of DW_TAGs to see what parts of PR17891 and PR17892 to tackle next, and I've concluded that they will be insufficient. Instead, I'd like to implement a more aggressive plan,

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > For those interested, I've attached some pie charts based on Duncan's > data > > in one of the other posts; successive slides break down the usage > > increasingly finely. To my

On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 09:24 +0200, Nicola Lugato wrote: > > In any case when you > > want to obtain a base pointer to a "derived" object (where derivation > > is implemented as you showed - with nesting) it's simply a matter of > > using getelementptr to obtain a pointer to the nested base object and > > using that. > > Umm ok, but i've the

For those interested, I've attached some pie charts based on Duncan's data in one of the other posts; successive slides break down the usage increasingly finely. To my understanding, they represent the number of Value's (and subclasses) allocated. On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > In r219010, I merged integer and

Here's the IR I'm trying to compile for my backend, a 16-bit CPU: ; ModuleID = 'foo.c' source_filename = "foo.c" target datalayout = "E-m:e-p16:16:16-i1:16:16-i8:16:16-i16:16:16-i32:16:16-i64:16:16-S16-n16" target triple = "tms9900" @global_var = common global i16 0, align 2 ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind optnone define signext i16 @dothis(i16

Hi, I'm writing a Scheme compiler in C++ with the LLVM library. The dynamic type system is hard to tackle with direct LLVM from the C++ lib, so I'd like to throw the work off into a C support library I could link the compiled Scheme with. How can I generate code that depends on/calls external symbols? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

If I edit the value of a global variable in my dialplan, could there be a risk of collision between calls? More in details: could a global var be used to build a counter that will be incremented by every call that passes. I think when 2 calls come in almost sumiltaneously, they could both be incrementing and saving the same value... which is bad! Anybody knows how asterisk handles this? K

Hi, is there a opt pass that replaces the SSA virtual registers to stack-variables? I want to eliminate the SSA virtual register from my IR. Kindly suggest BR/Nizam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140201/bdc3909a/attachment.html>