similar to: [LLVMdev] MSCV linker and OperandInfo constants

James_Clayton at scee.net writes: [snip] > This is the first time I've made any patches to llvm - please let me know > if you'd like any more information. Please consider submitting your patch to llvm-commits mailing list, which is the correct place for reviewing patches. Inline the patch in your message, don't post links. OTOH, you may be interested on the LLVM coding

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > James_Clayton at scee.net writes: > > [snip] > >> This is the first time I've made any patches to llvm - please let me know >> if you'd like any more information. > > Please consider submitting your patch to llvm-commits mailing list, > which is the correct place for

Is it possible to have some folders be mbox and some be maildir format? Why you might ask? Sometime for diagnostics I have the Exim MTA archive certain messages in MBOX format and then I want to copy them into an imao folder to look at them with Thunderbird. When I used MBOX all I had to do was copy the file into a folder and it worked. So what I'd like to do is have a folder with a

On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 18:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz < glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > So, shall we setup a server for that or is there some existing > infrastructure > from LLVM that is used in this case? > Unfortunately, we don't have a centralised infrastructure like GCC. Each target community is responsible for maintaining their own buildbots. All we

Its awesome to see so much progress on this! A very minor question - why is it called M680x0 and not M68K given that's what the target arch/triple is and how its usually referred to? Sorry for the bikeshedding.... Simon. On 30/09/2020 21:14, Min-Yih Hsu via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi All, > > I've composed a draft roadmap for this new target. I've decided to try >

Hi, I previously made a proposal for adding a pragma for per-function optimization level control due to a number of requests from our customers (See http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/28958 for the previous discussion), however the discussion was inconclusive. Some of my colleagues recently had the opportunity to discuss the proposal with a number of people at and

So.. I have investigated more on how a new function attribute to disable optimization on a per-function basis could be implemented. At the current state, with the lack of specific support from the pass managers I found two big problems when trying to implement a prototype implementation of the new attribute. Here are the problems found: 1) It is not safe to disable some transform passes in the

Hi, I just wanted to bump this discussion in case anyone had any more comments to make. We're in a bit of a bind here as we've now had requests for this feature from 10 separate customers, so we're going to be required to implement this feature somehow in our private branch at least (all of the other compilers they use already support some form of this feature so it is very

Dropping opt level should not lead to ABI changes. Otherwise you won't be able to mix-match O2 and O0 objects either. David On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM, jahanian <fjahanian at apple.com> wrote: > Wouldn’t implementing this proposal be a red herring? By this I mean, it is > possible that > throughout the optimization phases, there is an implied assumption that all >

Hi David, > Regarding Andrea's proposal -- the new #pragma can be useful (in rare > cases when there is a compiler bug), the intended use cases are > questionable: > 1) it should not be used as a mechanism to triage compiler bugs -- the > compiler backend should have mechanism to allow any pass to be > disabled for any (range of) function(s) via command line options so >

Andrea_DiBiagio at sn.scee.net wrote: > So.. > I have investigated more on how a new function attribute to disable > optimization on a per-function basis could be implemented. > At the current state, with the lack of specific support from the pass > managers I found two big problems when trying to implement a prototype > implementation of the new attribute. > > Here are the

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:06 AM, <Andrea_DiBiagio at sn.scee.net> wrote: > Hi David, > >> Regarding Andrea's proposal -- the new #pragma can be useful (in rare >> cases when there is a compiler bug), the intended use cases are >> questionable: >> 1) it should not be used as a mechanism to triage compiler bugs -- the >> compiler backend should have

Wouldn’t implementing this proposal be a red herring? By this I mean, it is possible that throughout the optimization phases, there is an implied assumption that all functions are similarly optimized. An example would be under certain optimization flag, compiler changes calling convention of static functions. - Fariborz On Jun 17, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Andrea_DiBiagio at sn.scee.net wrote: >

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:16 AM, <Peter_Marshall at sn.scee.net> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Sorry for the delay, I've been out of the office. > > I think this example shows that name matching does not always work: > > template<typename T> class A { > public: > A(T val); > private: > T x; > }; > > struct B { > typedef

Andrea_DiBiagio at sn.scee.net wrote: > Hi, > > I previously made a proposal for adding a pragma for per-function > optimization level control due to a number of requests from our customers > (See http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/28958 for > the previous discussion), however the discussion was inconclusive. Some > of my colleagues recently had the

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > That doesn't seem to be the DWARF I'm seeing from Clang (& it'd be > surprising if we used the typedef (or otherwise non-canonical) name in the > class name): > > > > Finally getting back to this….. Ha. We don't unwrap the typedefs ("name > as

On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> wrote: > Dropping opt level should not lead to ABI changes. Otherwise you won't > be able to mix-match O2 and O0 objects either. I was referring to “static functions”. Not that it happens, but something to consider. - Fariborz > > David > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM, jahanian

Hi Giorgio, > > I receive an error that seems related to the fact that the grep command > is missing. > > Is it possible? If grep is needed, how can I found it in Windows? > See here: http://clang.llvm.org/hacking.html#testingWindows grep (and a few other required tools) are in the GnuWin32 tools. Thanks, Greg Bedwell SN Systems - Sony Computer Entertainment Group

Hi All, Just been trying to follow the HowTo's for installing Cacti on Centos4 and realized theres an issue with one of the mysql GRANT statements. Not sure if its because of any updates to the cacti sql file or not but basically it needs to include LOCK TABLE as well otherwise the database doesnt get built properly. Happy to edit the wiki myself if required, username is NickMae. I like

Hi, I'm confused as to the purpose of rsync modules. I know how to set them up in rsyncd.conf, and can list the available modules on a remote linux machine using 'rsync camlinux01::' from a Win32 client, but I can't find any information on what they are actually for. The man page for rsyncd.conf talks about them as if they are vitaly important, but the man page for rsync