similar to: [LLVMdev] Problem in LLVM CMake modules

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > Yep, llvm_map_components_to_libraries gets confused by the existence of > both gtest and gtest_main and enters an infinite loop. A workaround is > to not pass "all" to llvm_map_components_to_libraries but a list of > required components. This patch *seems* to fix the problem (cmake regexps are not thoroughly documented):

Hi again, I'm trying to upgrade my LLVM bindings in Java from 2.9 to 3.1. To do so, I regenerated the JNI bindings from fresh LLVM 3.1 headers, and did a slight rewrite of my CMakeLists.txt file for building the C code. Problem is, cmake no longer finishes at all. I receive the following output, and then it just runs forever (while still responding to a CTRL-C): > eli at

Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > I'm trying to upgrade my LLVM bindings in Java from 2.9 to 3.1. To > do so, I regenerated the JNI bindings from fresh LLVM 3.1 headers, and > did a slight rewrite of my CMakeLists.txt file for building the C > code. > > Problem is, cmake no longer finishes at all. I receive the > following output, and then

Well for one thing, it gives one example of a CMakeLists.txt file that correctly uses LLVM, and nothing else. It gives no information on how to find out what set of components I need to map for what APIs. Neither does llvm-config list out the names of the actual components. I can use either the CMake modules or llvm-config to find the library names once I've got the component names, but

Hi I have a 3 level nested while-endwhile loop in a macro that when the execution reaches endwhile, it is jumping out to the While at the caller macro. It shouldn't since the are instructions after the endwhile. -- Executing [s at macro-call-from-outside:72] EndWhile("DAHDI/i1/1234567-4a7f", "") in new stack == Channel 'DAHDI/i1/1234567-4a7f' jumping out of

Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > I compiled and installed it to the prefix /usr, but that's not the > issue. Once I actually compile and install LLVM with CMake by hand, I > get the share/llvm/cmake stuff installed correctly (can those files be > included in "normal" builds, or will LLVM switch to CMake as its > primary build system?). Now

I seem to be having a conceptual problem with the "While" and "EndWhile" applications. It seems that on the first cycle, even if the result of the "While" is false that the enclosed applications will get run. Is this expected? It seems to be counter-intuitive, but I don't know what the intent of the While routines is. I could of course put a

Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > So you're saying that the default CMake build of LLVM creates static > libraries that got linked into my shared-object and now require me to > link in everything they require myself? Shouldn't the linker be able > to track down C++ runtime for this? You told CMake to manage your shared library as if it were a pure C

I'm seeing this as well, but for the LLVMAlphaAsmParser: CMake Error at cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake:90 (message): Library LLVMAlphaAsmPrinter not found in list of llvm libraries. Call Stack (most recent call first): cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake:27 (explicit_map_components_to_libraries) cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake:20 (explicit_llvm_config) cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:61

Hello, I am looking for a loop unfolding procedure implemented in LLVM that helps to transform a while-loop to n-layer If-statements. The transformation should be on IR, although the example below is illustrated on the source level. original loop: * WHILE (condition) DO action ENDWHILE* Expected unfolded loop (2-layer): * IF (condition) THEN* * action* * IF

After I actually get everything compiling, install the library, and load it from my Java program, I get the following: > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: > /usr/lib/libjllvm.so: /usr/lib/libjllvm.so: undefined symbol: > _ZTVN10__cxxabiv120__si_class_type_infoE If I have to guess, this means that the CMake stuff given is linking to the C++ libraries

Hello, I'd like to translate de code below, write in octave, to R. I'm learning to operate R a few time ago, and an example of translation will be useful for me. This code is my lectures in an undergraduate course of statistical computing. echo off; k=0; while (k<>1) n = input('a prime: '); D = 2; r = n - D * floor((n/D)); while((D <= sqrt(n) & (r <>

On Oct 11, 2008, at 8:41 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote: >> If you were interested in working on this project, it seems that the >> place to start is not by adding new crazy sorts of API tests for >> LLVM. It would be a better use of your time to take what we already >> have and make it work (with one of your proposals) on windows. When >> the infrastructure is set up,

Recently, I've been having issues with the URIs returned from e.164.org and toll free calls. It seems that the URIs that are returned from ENUMQUERY and ENUMRESULT are no longer the proper numbering schemes that the poviders use. I've been using the following [enum] template in my outbound route for quite some time with great success until recently. [enum](!) exten =>

I hope this isn't a FAQ. Per the man page I see ways to control the blocksize for hash comparison reasons, but no way to control it for i/o performance reasons. I'm using rsync to copy folder trees full of large files and I'd like to have control of how much data is read / written at a time. Maybe read 10 MB, write 10 MB, etc. Is there an existing way to do that? == details ==

Hi all, CMake seems to have broken in the last few days - or is it just me? tcare:llvm-release tcare$ make -j4 -- Target triple: x86_64-apple-darwin10.5.0 -- Native target architecture is X86 -- Threads enabled. -- Building with -fPIC -- Targeting X86 CMake Error at cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake:90 (message): Library LLVMARMAsmParser not found in list of llvm libraries. Call Stack (most

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > On Oct 11, 2008, at 8:41 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote: > >> I am not sure how well the current tests could be ported though, they >> are very gcc-centric, as in compile with llvm-gcc and execute what >> llvm-gcc compiled, not very useful as an api test. I have not really >> looked much into the current test setup once I

> Is it reasonable to ask Yes, it's reasonable. Moreover, I'd be content with a build system that doesn't use MSVS IDE at all. If the build system could be parameterized to use microsoft cl compiler (cygwin gcc is useless for my purposes), e.g. something like in Boost project, I'd be more than happy to never care about VS project files. Yet, I want to limit my involvement

All, One big thing I failed to mention is I was running rsync inside a cygwin windows 8.1 setup. I moved it to a linux box and the behavior is much better. I get a nice smooth 85-90 MB/sec. That might be the max speed of the source drive. I'd still like a way to improve rsync's performance in cygwin, but I can understand it is a low priority. Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer

On Nov 4, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > >> So you're saying that the default CMake build of LLVM creates static >> libraries that got linked into my shared-object and now require me to >> link in everything they require myself? Shouldn't the linker be able >> to track down C++ runtime for