similar to: [LLVMdev] pods

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] pods"

2012 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] pods
I checked all of the man pages generated using Sphinx and I thought that: 1. They all looked mostly identical. 2. When they didn't, I was equally happy with the Sphinx output. Can you provide two specific .1 files one from POD and one from Sphinx that shows an issue you are concerned about. I haven't encountered problems with "Sphinx crashing" generating man pages. This
2012 Aug 02
1
[LLVMdev] pods
On 08/02/12 13:42, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > I checked all of the man pages generated using Sphinx and I thought that: > > 1. They all looked mostly identical. > > 2. When they didn't, I was equally happy with the Sphinx output. I couldn't get Sphinx to work. It would always bomb out so I gave up. Also sphinx is pretty heavy weight which is not helpful for our environment.
2023 Jan 02
2
rewrite manpages to mdoc(7)
On Jan 01 00:05:09, jamie at catflap.org wrote: > Jan Stary via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > > > On Dec 31 11:43:56, paul at nohats.ca wrote: > > > Why not go to xml and use xml2man / pandoc ? > > > > Because it is a terrible manpage format > > and the toolchain produces broken crap. > > I have no specific knowledge on
2019 Apr 05
0
cifs-utils release 6.9 ready for download
This is a big release that contains many functional changes that are aligned with the recent work done in the Linux SMB3 kernel client. These changes mostly aim to improve user experience by unlocking new features available in modern SMB3 servers: - smbinfo utility is added to query various kinds of information from the server (objectId, snapshots, different FileInfo* classes and other
2017 Aug 02
2
llvm-trunk errors with gcc-5.3.0 on SuSE Linux
Hi, I try to build llvm-trunk with Cmake (gcc-5.3.0 is necessary for CUDA) on my "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12.2 (x86_64)". svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm cd llvm/tools svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk clang svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/polly/trunk polly cd clang/tools svn co
2015 Apr 09
2
[LLVMdev] MMX/SSE subtarget feature in IR
Thanks Kevin for the reply. I got the point now :) On 10 Apr 2015 00:18, "Smith, Kevin B" <kevin.b.smith at intel.com> wrote: > For x86_64 ABI, a minimum feature set of SSE2 is required. > > > > Kevin > > > > *From:* llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] *On > Behalf Of *suyog sarda > *Sent:* Thursday, April 09,
2015 May 26
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.7 release plans
Hello everyone, There is still some time to go, but I would like to share my preliminary plan for 3.7. The idea is to keep us on the 6-month release cycle, which means: - Branch for 3.7 on 14 July 2015 - Release 3.7 end of August (absolutely no later than 4 September) I also have a few things I'd like to try this time: - Announce the first release candidate on llvm-announce to encourage
2008 Sep 03
4
delta index in Sphinx
Hello, all! Help me please to solve problem with Sphinx and its delta index. Configuration file is located in attachment to this topic. ------------------------------------------------------------------- mysql> select id, e_mail from users where e_mail LIKE ''%test%''; -------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 Feb 11
4
Documentation doesn't get updated
Hi Tanya, Last time I noticed a problem with clang-tools-extra docs you could help solving them. If someone else is taking care of this part of the infrastructure now, please redirect appropriately. It looks like docs generated from rst (for LLVM, Clang and clang-tools-extra) don't get updated at the moment. They stopped updating somewhere between r353327
2003 Dec 18
11
Sphinx
Hi. I just started trying to play with Sphinx. I followed their site as far as running sphinx-server. It is listening on the default port. I copied sphinx2-simple to another file and changed sphinx2-continuous to sphinx2-server. So, I ran eagi-sphinx-test under asterisk. What exactly is it supposted to do? Here's what I get: debian:~# sphinx2-simple2 sphinx2-simple: Demo CMU Sphinx2
2015 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] MMX/SSE subtarget feature in IR
Your clang invocation below works for me, and generates target triple in the llvm IR of i386. And then in the specific options for the functions it generates the following: ; Function Attrs: nounwind define float @foo() #0 { entry: ret float 1.000000e+00 } attributes #0 = { nounwind "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "no-frame-pointer-elim"= "true"
2020 Apr 30
6
[Query] Facing issue in build libvirt6.0 on ubuntu 1804
Hi all, I am trying to build libvirt 6.0 on ubuntu OS 18.04. Facing one issue libvirt source compilation. ============================================ <stdin>:215: (ERROR/3) Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. .. code-block:: help [command-or-group] <stdin>:229: (ERROR/3) Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s)
2010 Aug 09
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Moving to Sphinx for LLVM and friends documentation (with partial implementation (in both 10pt and 12pt font)).
Michael, The benefits of Sphinx sound nice but one comment: The main page and the tables of contents in the other pages (at least the ones I looked at: Getting Started; Lang Ref) are so long and sparse that it is difficult to get the big picture of what is there and even to find a document unless you know what to search for. The originals were much more compact and so much better in this regard.
2019 Feb 14
3
Documentation doesn't get updated
Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having issues but the other documentation has been fixed. -Tanya > On Feb 14, 2019, at 3:53 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > > Tanya, friendly ping. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:21 PM Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com <mailto:alexfh at google.com>> wrote: > Hi Tanya, >
2010 Aug 09
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Moving to Sphinx for LLVM and friends documentation (with partial implementation (in both 10pt and 12pt font)).
Moving the LLVM Documentation to Sphinx ======================================= As a few of you that are on IRC already know, I have experimented with moving the LLVM documentation over to `Sphinx <http://sphinx.pocoo.org/index.html>`__ from the current html form. I have moved almost all of the content over and have begun "Sphinxifying" the documentation to correct links and make
2005 May 31
3
Opinions of Sphinx?
I'm planning a system of 120 SIP or PRI channels using speech recognition (fixed grammar of 500 words) menus. I could use a Cisco router and VoiceXML, but would prefer not to on cost grounds. Has anyone tried Asterisk and Sphinx (bonus points if in a production environment)? If so, what's your opinion on quality of recognition, stability, resource usage, etc? Anyone have any
2019 Jun 13
3
[docs] Updating the sphinx build bots
Hi, TL;DR - We should update the bot(s) responsible for building the LLVM documentation so that they use recommonmark 0.5.0, and apply https://reviews.llvm.org/D63211. Full context: I recently started trying to build the sphinx docs. However, a change by Jordan (r363100) resulted in me no longer being able to build them, even though the build bots were green and he could build them himself.
2017 Apr 03
6
Debugging Docs and llvm.org/docs/
> On 3 Apr 2017, at 22:47, Alex Denisov <1101.debian at gmail.com> wrote: > > The HTML generated using sphinx[1]. > At the bottom of each page you can see actual version of sphinx used to generate this page. > Thanks -- interesting that the docs haven't been updated since March 15th: © Copyright 2003-2017, LLVM Project. Last updated on 2017-03-16. Created using Sphinx
2019 Feb 18
2
Documentation doesn't get updated
Thank you! It seems like new changes in .rst files are picked up quickly now. -- Alex On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 7:33 PM Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > This should all be fixed now. > > Thanks, > Tanya > > > On Feb 14, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having
2012 Dec 25
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Do you use UML utility programs?
On 12/25/12 11:10 AM, Sean Silva wrote: > UML diagrams can be really helpful for explaining how a piece of code > works (such as the diagrams in your klang project on github). > > The main reason I don't draw them is that I haven't found convenient > tools to use which integrate well with my workflow. Doxygen produces > class diagrams, but I would really like to have