similar to: [LLVMdev] OpenCL with device fission to LLVM-IR

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:47 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like we only attach the GNU_ranges_base to skeleton CUs, and > never use the attribute under non-fission. Is that right? It's not > obvious to me why we'd want to only include this under fission, but I > admittedly don't fully understand it anyway. > So we're not

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:47 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> It looks like we only attach the GNU_ranges_base to skeleton CUs, and >> never use the attribute under non-fission. Is that right? It's not >> obvious to me why we'd want to only include this

It looks like we only attach the GNU_ranges_base to skeleton CUs, and never use the attribute under non-fission. Is that right? It's not obvious to me why we'd want to only include this under fission, but I admittedly don't fully understand it anyway. - Dave

As the the first review series of "WoW: the earth fission", we invited the chief task of WoW: theesigner Dave "Fargo" Kosak to discuss with you about his views on the mission design about earth fission. Q: And we will talk about the advantages and disadvantages in the region of 80-85 level? We aim to create the global catastrophe atmosphere; we apportioned the top region to

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > So Dehao and I have been dealing with some of the nitty gritty details of > > debug info with ThinLTO, specifically with Fission(Split DWARF). > > > > This applies to LTO as

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Vikram Adve > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 3:52 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] "SPIR" ? A Standard Portable IR for OpenCL > Kernel Language > > On Sep 6, 2012, at 4:33 PM, "Ouriel, Boaz"

> On May 4, 2017, at 4:53 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Alrighty, a little fuzzy on how best to implement this - Adrian, you've probably got the most context here as to how to wrangle this. > > My first attempt was in IRMover.cpp, IRLinker::linkFunctionBody - after metadata is copied over, create a new subprogram derived from Dst.getSubprogram,

So Dehao and I have been dealing with some of the nitty gritty details of debug info with ThinLTO, specifically with Fission(Split DWARF). This applies to LTO as well, so I won't single out ThinLTO here. 1) Multiple CUs in a .dwo file Clang/LLVM produces a CU for each original source file - these CUs are kept through IR linking (thin or full) and produced as distinct CUs in the resulting

Hi, I am trying to implement my own Loop fission transformations in llvm. But to find circular dependency, i think i have to use LoopDependenceAnalysis. I am using ModulePass. In this pass I am getting LoopInfo and Loops. but when I try to use LoopDependenceAnalysis It throws segmentation fault. the example shows what i want to do : for(int i = 0; i< n ; i++){ s1 : a[i]

On Sep 6, 2012, at 4:33 PM, "Ouriel, Boaz" <boaz.ouriel at intel.com> wrote: > **** Introduction **** > Lately, Khronos has ratified a new provisional specification which is called SPIR. > This specification standardizes an intermediate representation for the OpenCL kernel language. > It is based on LLVM infrastructure and this is why I am sending this mail to the

Greetings All, I am sending this mail on behalf of the OpenCL Khronos members. **** Introduction **** Lately, Khronos has ratified a new provisional specification which is called SPIR. This specification standardizes an intermediate representation for the OpenCL kernel language. It is based on LLVM infrastructure and this is why I am sending this mail to the LLVM mailing list. Khronos members

> On May 3, 2017, at 7:43 PM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On May 3, 2017, at 2:59 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:09 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com <mailto:aprantl at apple.com>> wrote:

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:09 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > > On May 3, 2017, at 2:00 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > So Dehao and I have been dealing with some of the nitty gritty details > of debug info with ThinLTO, specifically with Fission(Split DWARF). > > > > This applies to LTO as well, so I

Hello, I want to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM to check correctness of a llvm module which I wrote. How to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM? Unnikrishnan C -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Hello, I'm using fArma package to estimate the value of Hurst exponent using R/S method. However, for a certain set of data I get H ~ 1.8. How do I interpret this? Following are the output that I get for this set: > mean(data[,2]) [1] 400.5433 > sd(data[,2]) [1] 1139.786 > > rsFit(data[,2], levels = 64) Title: Hurst Exponent from R/S Method Call: rsFit(x = data[, 2], levels

Hello, I'm an absolute beginner with R. I'm hoping to do some time-series analysis on my data. The data looks like #time value 18 153 20 426 70 7 83 130 84 7 and so on where time could be in seconds or hours or days (not all at the same time). How could I import such a file to R and do some simple stuff (say plot the values)? As per the tutorials on time series, I could use the ts()

On Tuesday 16 December 2008 12:21:24 Timothy Baldridge wrote: > There seems to be some interest these days in OpenCL. However for some > projects, a issue they face to adopting OpenCL is requirements of > maintaining two source trees: one for normal C code (for use on > systems without OpenCL support or poor OpenCL performance) and another > for OpenCL. > > I am interested in

Awesome, is the development of this being tracked somewhere? And is there a way I can get involved? Timothy On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Zack Rusin <zack at tungstengraphics.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 16 December 2008 12:21:24 Timothy Baldridge wrote: >> There seems to be some interest these days in OpenCL. However for some >> projects, a issue they face to adopting

There seems to be some interest these days in OpenCL. However for some projects, a issue they face to adopting OpenCL is requirements of maintaining two source trees: one for normal C code (for use on systems without OpenCL support or poor OpenCL performance) and another for OpenCL. I am interested in using LLVM to create a OpenCL frontend for multicore CPUs. Now that the spec is out, we have a

Portable OpenCL aims to be an efficient open source (MIT-licensed) implementation of the OpenCL 1.2 standard. In addition to producing an easily portable open source OpenCL implementation, another major goal of the project is improving performance portability of OpenCL programs with compiler optimizations, reducing the need for target-dependent manual optimizations. At the core of pocl is the