similar to: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Curent svn build, generates llvm DEBUG builds

Hi, I'm having a slow startup (30") of Remote Desktop Client (mstsc) in windows 8 and windows 10. I've tried it in Windows 7 and it starts correctly (3-5"). Once connection is stablished it goes smoothly. I've tried connecting Remote Desktop with an IP and I've got same behaviour. When I'm starting Remote Desktop from Windows 10 or 8 I get next message in samba

I'd like to know how to link console functions such as WriteConsoleOutputA. They are documented as implemented, and I can compile source code including these function predefinitions, but I get undefined errors when linking. I don't know which library to add to get objects linked. Thanks in advance. Ignasi Villagrasa.

Hi all, I'm compiling LLCM IR code like this on x86-64: define linkonce ccc <16 x float> @vector_add_float(<16 x float> %a.78, <16 x float> %a.79) align 8 { entry: %result.80 = fadd <16 x float> %a.78, %a.79 ret <18 x float> %result.80 } This works really well when the vector length (16 in the above) is an integer multiple of the SSE vector

hello I need a clarification. in logistic regression, saturated model having all combinations and interactions of variables should be constructed in this way ? : > rsat2=glm(cbind(landp,landa) ~ as.factor(rlito)*as.factor(rslp)*as.factor(rasp)*as.factor(rplc)*as.factor(rwi),family= binomial(link=logit),data=rdf46) then using stepAIC to eliminate some models having high AIC values. >

Hi Erik, this is a bug, please open a bugreport. The LLVM type legalizer has a bunch of code to handle this (vector widening), but unfortunately the argument lowering code seems to have scalarized the function arguments before getting to the type legalizer. Compare with the code produced for the following: define void @vector_add_float(<18 x float> *%rp, <18 x float> *%a.78p,

Hello All I 'm studing LLVM/Clang and trying to follow the Kaleidoscope tutorial (Release 2.6 version). I found some minir docu-bugs and added them to Bugzilla. However, Now I found a show-stopper for me, the toy (v4) demo does build, but does crash, on any input. Even a simpe ';'! Looking into the (demo-code) found the that the JIT can't be build/ created,/loaded/... Which

Hi, AMD is currently looking for talented compiler engineers to work with LLVM and this list seemed like a good place to let people know. Below is the job description, please send me an email if you are interested. Regards, Ben Compiler engineer We are currently looking for a software engineer as part of the core team developing OpenCL, a new open standard for heterogonous

I get the following message when cross compiling Opus 1.2.1 for android with clang in a standalone build.   CC       src/opus_decoder.lo src/opus_decoder.c:37:10: warning: You appear to be compiling without optimization, if so opus will be very slow. [-W#pragma-messages] # pragma message "You appear to be compiling without optimization, if so opus will be very slow." Looking at the

Hi, I have two new Asterisk installations (1.4.4 and 1.4.5) and I have created rsa keys and they can now see each other as online peers: moe*CLI> iax2 show peers Name/Username Host Mask Port Status bart 192.168.2.201 (S) 255.255.255.255 4569 OK (48 ms) 1 iax2 peers [1 online, 0 offline, 0 unmonitored] but on the 1.4.5

C:\llvm\bin>llc -version Low Level Virtual Machine (http://llvm.org/): llvm version 2.6svn DEBUG build. Built Jan 31 2010(20:46:01). Registered Targets: x86 - 32-bit X86: Pentium-Pro and above x86-64 - 64-bit X86: EM64T and AMD64 I did specify the release build with cmake; the lack of crashing on exit of programs compiled therewith confirms that :-) As far as I can see, the

Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> writes: > C:\llvm\bin>llc -version > Low Level Virtual Machine (http://llvm.org/): > llvm version 2.6svn > DEBUG build. > Built Jan 31 2010(20:46:01). > > Registered Targets: > x86 - 32-bit X86: Pentium-Pro and above > x86-64 - 64-bit X86: EM64T and AMD64 > > I did specify the release build

Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ... root at sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-* -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37 /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.ko -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 10808 Mar 16 19:37 /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko

Hi Jack, > The curent llvm svn (r54623) is unable to link the gfortran > compiler in llvm-gcc-4.2 svn. I am getting the error... ... > Undefined symbols: > "_create_init_utf16_var", referenced from: > _darwin_build_constant_cfstring in libbackend.a(darwin.o) this is probably due to recent Apple changes. Fortran builds on linux. > Why is c++ being used

The curent llvm svn (r54623) is unable to link the gfortran compiler in llvm-gcc-4.2 svn. I am getting the error... c++ -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -mdynamic-no-pic -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o f951 \

thank you. I'll submit the patch without #ifdef in this case. Robert ________________________________ From: dblaikie at gmail.com [dblaikie at gmail.com] Sent: 14 January 2014 17:03 To: Robert Lytton; echristo at gmail.com; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] test suite 'owner' On Mon Jan 13 2014 at 12:25:14 PM, Robert Lytton <robert at xmos.com<mailto:robert at

To All, I am going to try my hand at setting up an ldap server. I have looked at what is available and would like to ask your opinions as to what is a good one to have. openldap, centos-ds, and freeipa seem to be high on everyone's list. Which one do you like, and does it have a good setup tutorial I could use. So far the tutorials I have looked at seem out of sync with the curent versions

Hi ! We curently have a centos 5 / asterisk 1.4 server that we have some DTMF problems with. It has a Sangoma A104d card and only port one is used to connect to the PSTN. Port 2 is conencted via a cross-over cable to a RAS for modem access and port 3 is connected for data communication via PPP. Now, I want to freshen this setup to something newer. So I installed a Scientific Linux 6 server,

... and so (I infer from that) it should not be patched let alone need any changes. Assuming my inference is correct, any patching should only affect the XCore target and only if there is a good reason why the XCore requires the change. So, is #ifdef around all/most changes the correct way to submit a patch? Robert ________________________________ From: Eric Christopher [echristo at gmail.com]

Evan Cheng wrote: > On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Richard Osborne <richard at xmos.com> wrote: > > >> Roman Levenstein wrote: >> >>> Hi again, >>> >>> Now, after I fixed the graph coloring regalloc bug that was triggered >>> by the ARM target, I continue testing and found another bug, this >>> time >>> on

Based on cmake/modules/LLVMLibDeps.cmake, I produced a graphviz dot file and then manually removed components and edges until the graph was small enough to be presentable. I don't know if I can actually use LLVM due to its humongousness, but I hope the graph will be helpful to others attempting to comprehend LLVM. PNG attached; dot file follows. digraph G { ipo