similar to: [LLVMdev] Compiling llvm and Clang on Linux

I tried CC=gcc44 CXX=g++44 ../llvm/configure and got CC=gcc44: Command not found So the syntax is indeed as wriiten in the help. Sitvanit Ruah Formal Verification Group IBM Haifa Research Laboratory Tel: 972-4-828-1249 From: Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> To: Sitvanit Ruah/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Cc: Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu,

Hi Sitvanit, On 12/07/12 22:18, Sitvanit Ruah wrote: > I ran "configure -help " and it says > > usage: configure [OPTION]..... [VAR=VALUE] > > So I assume configure CC=... is the right syntax. Isn't it? while you might think so, try it the other way round. Also, by doing make VERBOSE=1 you can see which compiler is really being used. Ciao, Duncan. > >

I ran "configure -help " and it says usage: configure [OPTION]..... [VAR=VALUE] So I assume configure CC=... is the right syntax. Isn't it? Regard, Sitvanit From: Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru> To: Sitvanit Ruah/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Cc: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> Date:

> Yes, it is the same error referring to 4.1.2. > > /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c+ > +/4.1.2/i386-redhat-linux/bits/gthr-default.h:114:1: error: weakref > declaration must have internal > linkage > __gthrw(pthread_key_delete) > > There are several such errors. Are you sure you are usin gcc44? Don't you need to run CC=gcc44 CXX=g++44

Hi Sitvanit, > I tried > > CC=gcc44 CXX=g++44 ../llvm/configure > > and got > > CC=gcc44: Command not found > > So the syntax is indeed as wriiten in the help. actually, no, this just means that you are using a shell that doesn't support this syntax. What shell are you using? Try export CC=gcc44 export CXX=g++44 ../llvm/configure Ciao, Duncan. >

On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru> wrote: >> It seems like the llvm-3.3-* packages are gone from the Ubuntu Precise >> APT repository, http://llvm.org/apt/precise/. >> >> Is this on purpose? Any recommended replacements? (Launchpad?) > > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#getting-started-quickly-a-summary Sorry, but

Sylvestre (CC'd) might know where to find it on Debian/Ubuntu repositories. cheers, --renato On 6 October 2013 18:45, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote: > Konstantin, This is a legitimate question because the packages are > maintained by the LLVM project and kept on llvm.org. > > David, while I don't see 3.3 packages I do see 3.4 snapshots in the > repository.

Konstantin, This is a legitimate question because the packages are maintained by the LLVM project and kept on llvm.org. David, while I don't see 3.3 packages I do see 3.4 snapshots in the repository. Will that not do? If there are any regressions keeping you back on 3.3 now's a good time to report them! Alp. On 06/10/2013 18:22, David Nadlinger wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:12

What is the best level to use for backend development? We do not need to generate machine code, but rather an intermediate representation that will give us the control flow graph. Is this the llvm IR? If so, how do I read into memory a file that was generated by clang++ -emit-llvm <source file>. Thanks, Sitvanit Sitvanit Ruah Formal Verification Group IBM Haifa Research Laboratory Tel:

Hello, I did some cleanup of the repositories today (Sunday). I remove all the 3.3 snapshots which were wrong (they were older than the official 3.3 release and not maintained). I didn't think that anybody was using them (Looks like I was wrong, sorry!). You are not happy about the 3.4 packages ? Sylvestre On 06/10/2013 19:52, Renato Golin wrote: > Sylvestre (CC'd) might know where

> Hi all, > After reading the documentation on clang I still have the following > question: > How do I read the bitcode generated by clang from a C++ file? I need to > have all the AST information in memory. AST has nothing to do with LLVM bitcode. -- Regards, Konstantin

06.10.2013, 18:44, "David Nadlinger" <code at klickverbot.at>: > Hi all, > > It seems like the llvm-3.3-* packages are gone from the Ubuntu Precise > APT repository, http://llvm.org/apt/precise/. > > Is this on purpose? Any recommended replacements? (Launchpad?) http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#getting-started-quickly-a-summary -- Regards, Konstantin

I'm trying to enumerate different combinations to get a workable solution. At least this combination passed the previously failed step, but got stuck in later ones. Also my GCC is still 4.5, so llvm 3.0 is not that outdated? Regards, Ryan On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru>wrote: > > 29.06.2012, 12:17, "ryan" <stdstack at

29.06.2012, 12:17, "ryan" <stdstack at gmail.com>: > I tried some other configurations. Now with llvm 3.0 + clang 3.0, and expoert CC to be clang -flto -use-gold-plugin,and other ENV variables. > Good news is the "no archive symbol error message" is gone, but bad news is new error messages appear Why are you using outdated llvm and clang? -- Regards, Konstantin

19.08.2016, 18:38, "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org>: > On 19 August 2016 at 16:34, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru> wrote: >>>  But that affected *everybody*. Using Git or SVN, using Windows or >>>  Linux, trying to download Linux, LLVM, GCC, Linaro stuff. >> >>  But with SVN you don't fetch complete history. > >

Hi Konstantin, good point. but I my intention is to have something like the llva project. Basically I would like to define a machine that looks as if it has processors running natively llvm code. And when that runs enhance the llvm byte code with some specific instructions. Besides this if I make my measurements on the running of llvm bytecode I can test several platforms simultaneously because I

03.12.2012, 11:44, "Marc J. Driftmeyer" <mjd at reanimality.com>: > One of the most conservative distributions is Debian. RHEL/CentOS is more conservative. RHEL 6 ships Python 2.6.6, RHEL 5 (which is still widely used) ships 2.4.3 -- Regards, Konstantin

On 9/19/13 9:53 AM, Herbei Dacian wrote: > > Hi Konstantin, > good point. > but I my intention is to have something like the llva project. If you want something like the LLVA project for user-space applications, then you basically want to use LLVM as-is. The only things missing are the instructions that replace certain in-line assembly sequences that cannot be represented by

> -----Original Message----- > From: Konstantin Tokarev [mailto:annulen at yandex.ru] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 9:10 AM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: Chris Lattner; Dmitry Vyukov; LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] C++ demangling in LLVM > > > > 15.08.2012, 19:25, "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>: > > Three

15.08.2012, 19:25, "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>: > Three reasons. > 1) I need to modify the code to support extensions to the standard demangler. > 2) GCC's version is GPL v3. And? BTW, there is BSD-licensed implementation of __cxa_demangle in libcxxrt > 3) Need windows support. > > Micah -- Regards, Konstantin