similar to: [LLVMdev] cmake and setting target triple

Hi, *make install* works for me on Ubuntu. Does the output of *make install* show that it was successful? Was it setup to be installed in a PATH location of Fedora? --John -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110411/8bab1522/attachment.html>

Hi, Sorry, but I cant seem to repeat the issue anymore. 'make install' works fine now. I have no idea what went wrong the first time. Thanks for the effort, and sorry to have bothered you with this. On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, John Myers <atomicdog.jwm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > make install works for me on Ubuntu. > Does the output of make install show

John Myers <atomicdog.jwm at gmail.com> writes: > I'm looking for some pointers on how to troubleshoot this problem. I'm > trying to write a backend for the AVR. > There is an undefined reference at line 48 which is the line FrameInfo() is > on. I've tried to use the MSP430 and other targets as references so I'm not > sure > what changes I did would cause a

Hi, I'm looking for some pointers on how to troubleshoot this problem. I'm trying to write a backend for the AVR. There is an undefined reference at line 48 which is the line FrameInfo() is on. I've tried to use the MSP430 and other targets as references so I'm not sure what changes I did would cause a problem on this line? AVRTargetMachine::AVRTargetMachine(const Target &T,

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote > > >> I'd like to wait until I get some feedback - I don't know yet if anyone is > having trouble building or running the thing... > Hi Talin, This is the build error I get on my ubuntu 64 bit system... john at ubuntu:~/src/build-llbrowse$ make [ 5%] Building CXX object

Hi, I just compiled llvm/clang from source on my fedora linux system as specified on the website, but running 'make' and 'make install' does not seem to result in a 'functioning' installation ? I mean, neither 'clang' or 'scan-build' seem to be found ? Are there any other actions I need to perform on my linux system in order to complete the installation

Hi Fellows, The goal is to find the induction variable for a loop, where the induction variable increments with the multiplication, division or shift operations, like this one: sz = 8; do { ... ... sz = sz / 2; } while (sz) Is SCEV capable of detecting the induction variable 'sz' in this case? The code snippet I am using to solve the problem is for each basic-block in a

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > LLBrowse - a GUI tool which allows you to inspect the contents of LLVM > modules - now runs on Linux and OS X, and it works with both LLVM 2.8 and > current LLVM head. I've updated the docs to include instructions on checking > out and building the code under several different environments, which you

On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:19:06 +0000 Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA at synopsys.com> wrote: > This patch set nukes all the dummy crtc mode_fixup implementations. > (made on top of Daniel topic/drm-misc branch) There's 2 typos in the subject line (s/hldcd/hlcdc/ and s/removed/remove/), and you're removing an empty line after atmel_hlcdc_crtc_create() definition (which is

On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:19:06 +0000 Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA at synopsys.com> wrote: > This patch set nukes all the dummy crtc mode_fixup implementations. > (made on top of Daniel topic/drm-misc branch) There's 2 typos in the subject line (s/hldcd/hlcdc/ and s/removed/remove/), and you're removing an empty line after atmel_hlcdc_crtc_create() definition (which is

Hi renato, 1. The command above is followed by the guide[ HowToCrossCompileLLVM.rst ] and I specify some path(ex. <path-to-host-bin>). 2. The including x86_64 libraries is added because of some missing libraries(ex. "error: Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it"). As I have found that the bugs needed to dealt with is some ARM-dependent libraries, I

LLBrowse - a GUI tool which allows you to inspect the contents of LLVM modules - now runs on Linux and OS X, and it works with both LLVM 2.8 and current LLVM head. I've updated the docs to include instructions on checking out and building the code under several different environments, which you can read here: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llbrowse/trunk/doc/LLBrowse.html (the doc also

Op 30-06-17 om 15:56 schreef Daniel Vetter: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:28:11PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> We want to change swap_state to wait indefinitely, but to do this >> swap_state should wait interruptibly. This requires propagating >> the error to each driver. All drivers have changes to deal with the >> clean up. In order to allow easy reverting, the

It's dead code because this is now handled in the core. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> Cc: Ben

Hi! I think it is a great idea. The DS80C400 needs external memory, and/or flash. It have the Ethernet integrated, but it is really slow (it is 8051 architecture), and yes, I know it can go up ti 75Mhz, but only gives 18MIPS max. I would use ATmega128 from atmel (16MIPS at only 16Mhz), take a look at: http://www.ethernut.de (project using mega128 with Ethernet, includes schematics). It

We want to change swap_state to wait indefinitely, but to do this swap_state should wait interruptibly. This requires propagating the error to each driver. All drivers have changes to deal with the clean up. In order to allow easy reverting, the commit that changes behavior is separate so someone only has to revert that for testing. Nouveau has a small bugfix, if drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_fences

Hi All, For quite some time there's been a side project for developing an AVR back end for LLVM: http://sourceforge.net/projects/avr-llvm/ What is required from us to be able to add this work to the LLVM repo? And when do you think would be a good time for us to do that? If this is located somewhere in the docs and I've missed it, pointers would certainly be appreciated. Thanks, Eric

I have been working for extending test coverage for years. Nowadays, I have several cross-testing (target != host). See http://bb.pgr.jp/console Each of them (test-*-linux) is doing; - Assume a preceding builder passes with warming ccache. - All compilation units will hit ccache whenever the tree is built before lit. - Almost all compilation units will hit ccache except for Host.cpp when

Hi! I have some problems with an bridge between wlan0 and eth0 device... It works and I can from both sides ping the router with the bridge device but I cant ping the devices from other net so I cant ping wlan devs from eth net and other way around the wlan card is an atmel usbw11 from linksys and eth is a intel e100 10/100mbit nic I have configured the bridge according to the how to and

I've been working on getting the LLVM OpenMP library to build smoothly alongside llvm/clang using CMake, but one problem I'm having is determining exactly which CMake option designates the architecture the compiler will compile. I see LLVM_TARGET_ARCH, LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD, LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE, etc. I thought I should just ask which one designates the architecture the compiler