Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial"
2012 Jul 09
3
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
On 7/9/2012 1:42 PM, Chad Rosier wrote:
> Have you looked here: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html
>
> Chad
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:33 AM, NY Knicks Fan wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to do the tutorials at:
>>
>> https://github.com/loarabia/Clang-tu...i/TutorialOrig
>> <https://github.com/loarabia/Clang-tutorial/wiki/TutorialOrig>
>>
2012 Jul 09
4
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
Use the -I<install path>/include .
This directory <install path>/include should look something like:
clang/ clang-c/ llvm/ llvm-c/
HTH
ashok
On 7/9/2012 3:15 PM, NY Knicks Fan wrote:
> I downloaded the 3.1 LLVM and Clang sources.
>
> I followed the directions at: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html
>
> I am able to use Clang to compile stuff, but I could
2012 Jul 09
3
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
The "make install" should collect everything into your <install path>.
The <install path> will then have bin, lib and include dirs.
On 7/9/2012 3:52 PM, NY Knicks Fan wrote:
> Hi Ashok,
>
> The documentation suggests that I put clang inside of llvm/tools and so
> I have two separate include directories. I tried both of them and
> neither worked:
>
> $
2012 Jul 09
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
Have you looked here: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html
Chad
On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:33 AM, NY Knicks Fan wrote:
> I'm trying to do the tutorials at:
>
> https://github.com/loarabia/Clang-tu...i/TutorialOrig
>
> and I can't even do the first tutorial. I installed LLVM 3.1 and Clang 3.1 and when I do:
>
> ~/loarabia-Clang-tutorial-3d79443$ clang++
2012 Jul 09
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
Hi Ashok,
The documentation suggests that I put clang inside of llvm/tools and so I have two separate include directories. I tried both of them and neither worked:
$ clang++ -I llvm/include tutorial1.cpp
In file included from tutorial1.cpp:5:
In file included from llvm/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:17:
In file included from llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:13:
2012 Jul 09
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
I downloaded the 3.1 LLVM and Clang sources.
I followed the directions at: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html
I am able to use Clang to compile stuff, but I could already do that with GCC.
I'm trying to use Clang for parsing code, but I can't even get started.
Can you tell me how to "include the installed location of clang/llvm headers directories in your include path"?
2012 Jul 09
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
On Jul 9, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Ashok Nalkund wrote:
> The "make install" should collect everything into your <install path>.
> The <install path> will then have bin, lib and include dirs.
And you should be able to specify the install path with the --prefix option when configuring. I believe the default is /usr/local (see: configure --help to verify).
Chad
> On
2012 Jul 09
1
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
I'm trying to do the tutorials at:
https://github.com/loarabia/Clang-tu...i/TutorialOrig
and I can't even do the first tutorial. I installed LLVM 3.1 and Clang 3.1 and when I do:
~/loarabia-Clang-tutorial-3d79443$ clang++ tutorial1.cpp In file included from tutorial1.cpp:5: In file included from ./llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:17: ./llvm/Support/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:13:10: fatal error:
2012 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
Hi Ashok,
As I mentioned in my earlier e-mail, my /usr/local/include does not have clang/ or clang-c/.
I'm unable to do a make or make install in the Clang build directory. How do I fix this?
Thanks!
________________________________
From: Ashok Nalkund <ashoknn at qualcomm.com>
To: NY Knicks Fan <nyknicksfan92009 at yahoo.com>; "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev
2012 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
Looks like your make/install is incomplete wrt clang. I follow the
instuctions for checking out the sources but build using cmake instead
of configure:
> cmake -G ""Unix Makefiles" -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release" -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX="../bin" ../llvm
> make install
This builds and installs llvm+clang in the bin
2012 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
Hi Ashok,
I created a new Ubuntu 12.04 virtual machine and followed directions except that I know use your cmake command instead of configure, and I got the error below.
Any help is very much appreciated.
$ /home/ubuntu/bin/bin/clang++ -I /home/ubuntu/bin/include/ tutorial1.cpp
In file included from tutorial1.cpp:5:
In file included from /home/ubuntu/bin/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:17:
2012 Jul 10
3
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
Add -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS to your compilation flag.
On 7/10/2012 11:23 AM, NY Knicks Fan wrote:
> Hi Ashok,
>
> I created a new Ubuntu 12.04 virtual machine and followed directions
> except that I know use your cmake command instead of configure, and I
> got the error below.
>
> Any help is very much appreciated.
>
>
> $
2012 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
OK. Thanks. I now get the following error (which appears to be a problem w/ the tutorial itself?):
$ /home/ubuntu/bin/bin/clang++ -I /home/ubuntu/bin/include/ -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS tutorial1.cpp/tmp/tutorial1-LQ71fW.o: In function `main':
tutorial1.cpp:(.text+0x42): undefined reference to `llvm::outs()'
tutorial1.cpp:(.text+0x72): undefined reference to
2012 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
You will need to link to the LLVM/clang libraries. To get the correct
flags, you can run:
./llvm-config --ldflags --libs
and use the flags reported.
On 7/10/2012 11:35 AM, NY Knicks Fan wrote:
> OK. Thanks. I now get the following error (which appears to be a
> problem w/ the tutorial itself?):
>
> $ /home/ubuntu/bin/bin/clang++ -I /home/ubuntu/bin/include/
>
2012 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
Hi Ashok,
$ cd bin/bin
$ ./llvm-config --ldflags --libs
-L/home/ubuntu/bin/lib -ldl -lpthread
-lLLVMAsmParser -lLLVMTableGen -lLLVMDebugInfo -lLLVMX86Disassembler -lLLVMX86AsmParser -lLLVMX86CodeGen -lLLVMSelectionDAG -lLLVMAsmPrinter -lLLVMX86Desc -lLLVMX86Info -lLLVMX86AsmPrinter -lLLVMX86Utils -lLLVMJIT -lLLVMMCDisassembler -lLLVMMCParser -lLLVMInstrumentation -lLLVMInterpreter
2012 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] Unable to do even basic Clang tutorial
You need to link in the libclang* as well.
On 7/10/2012 1:22 PM, NY Knicks Fan wrote:
> Hi Ashok,
>
> $ cd bin/bin
> $ ./llvm-config --ldflags --libs
> -L/home/ubuntu/bin/lib -ldl -lpthread
> -lLLVMAsmParser -lLLVMTableGen -lLLVMDebugInfo -lLLVMX86Disassembler
> -lLLVMX86AsmParser -lLLVMX86CodeGen -lLLVMSelectionDAG -lLLVMAsmPrinter
> -lLLVMX86Desc -lLLVMX86Info
2014 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] Clang Integration with MSVS 2013
I just installed the pre-compiled binaries for Clang 3.4.1, which was the
latest version I could find to download. Starting a new 'blank' project in
MSVC I was easily able to change the tool set from MS Visual Studio 2013
(v120) to LLVM-vs2013.
However, trying to compile a simple 'hello world' program resulted in the
following compiler errors. Is there something simple I am
2020 Jul 14
2
[Beginner] Understanding Tablegen language
On 7/13/2020 21:30, Thomas Lively via llvm-dev wrote:
> Part of the problem is that ISel patterns are like their own DSL inside
> the TableGen DSL, so keywords like "ins", "outs", and "ops" aren't
> keywords at the TableGen level, but rather at the level of the ISel
> system implemented with TableGen. Copying existing patterns and reading
> the
2012 Sep 27
4
[LLVMdev] Clang bug?
Is this a relevant location to provide information about what I
believe is a compiler bug in clang? If not, please forgive me for
posting it here. (Perhaps you can redirect me to some place more
appropriate.) If so, here are the details:
I have a short 15-line C++ program using only one standard header that
clang fails to compile properly under C++11 with the new standard
library (although the
2012 Sep 28
0
[LLVMdev] Clang bug?
That is one evil bug!
I just tested it against tip-of-trunk clang and it appears to be fixed there (just fyi for everyone).
Howard
On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Adam Peterson <alpha.eta.pi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this a relevant location to provide information about what I
> believe is a compiler bug in clang? If not, please forgive me for
> posting it here. (Perhaps you can