similar to: [LLVMdev] reducing llc's memory consumption

I have problem compiling the gcc frontend. Almost everything seems to compile but at the very end when crt startup files are compiled, the assembler complains about bad registers. Any idea what I am doing wrong? Thanks, Robert HOST: os: ubuntu 2.6.18 kernel x86_64 GNU/Linux compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5) SOURCE: svn trunk gcc4.2 CONFIGURE:

Dale: Yes, there were a number of postings in March. The issue seemed to not have been fully resolved but I added "i686-pc-linux-gnu" to the end of my command line and now the whole thing compiles. I cannot find a llvm-gcc binary in my install directory, all I have is gcc which reports: ../export/bin/gcc -dumpmachine i686-pc-linux-gnu It turns out I can generate llvm assembler output

On May 28, 2008, at 5:22 PM, robert muth wrote: > I have problem compiling the gcc frontend. > Almost everything seems to compile but at the very end > when crt startup files are compiled, the assembler complains > about bad registers. > Any idea what I am doing wrong? > Thanks, > Robert It looks like your assembler is being invoked in 32-bit mode. Other people have had

I believe I have followed Gour''s instructions to the letter for compiling wxwindows, ruby and wxruby. Indeed all of the compilation stages have worked flawlessly, however when I try to ruby any of the samples I get an error dialog "This application has failed to start because wxmsw241d.dll was not found ...." Looking in the c:/mingw/lib directory robertm@PC126 /mingw/lib $

I'm running SVM from e1071 package on a data with ~150 columns (variables) and 50000 lines of data (it takes a bit of time) for radial kernel for different gamma and cost values. I get a very large models with at least 30000 vectors and the prediction I get is not the best one. What does it mean and what could I do to ameliorate my model ? Jerzy Orlowski

Hi, We have found that exist a huge degradation in performance when doing I/O to a disk images contained in single files from a paravirtualized domain and from an HVM at the same time. The problem was found in a Xen box with Fedora 8 x86_64 binaries installed (Xen 3.1.0 + dom0 Linux 2.6.21). The test hardware was a rack mounted server with two 2.66 Ghz Xeon X5355 (4 cores each one, 128 Kb L1

In the past little while, we've seen a wave of attacks on asterisk, via the provisioning. It goes something like this: A. scan for IP phones on the internet, either via spotting something on port 5060, or via the port 80 web interface for the phone. Or, use web sites that scan the internet, and classify the machines, to make your work shorter. B. Once you get into the web GUI,

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > >> I tried to find some subset i felt was worthwhile and where it was > >> okay, but gave up after a while. > > > > > > I'm not quite sure which things you're referring to in that statement. > > Would you mind clarifying? > > You can try to ameliorate it

Let''s say I have the model class Reader and Magazine, connected by join model Subscription. It looks something like this class Reader < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :subscriptions, :dependent => :delete_all has_many :magazines, :through => :subscriptions validates_presence_of :name end class Magazine < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :subscriptions, :dependent =>

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 3:57?AM Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I did reply and asked to see the OP's named conf files, but they appear > to be super secret, so I suggest he runs 'named-checkconf > /etc/bind/named.conf' instead. The systemd error messages can mask the > real error. My apologies, I didn't realize you were asking to see

Hi, A developper of MandrakeSoft needed for some reason to ameliorate ogg123 in a way: with the patch when you issue a Ctrl+Z (suspending the app) the dsp is freed. Ofcourse the app can still continue when SIGCONT is received. Apparently he chose to separate the actual code into more functions. Please note that this code uses local functions, it thus needs gcc to compile. -=-=-- ---

On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 04:58:45PM -0800, Mehdi Amini wrote: > > > On Feb 5, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We have profiled [1] the memory usage in LLVM when LTO'ing Chromium, and > > we've found that one of the top consumers of memory is the DWARF emitter in

Hello, I was not happy with the power consumption of CentOS 6 x86_64 on a new Lenovo Thinkpad x220 Tablet and I worked on reducing it. I just wanted to share with the list one of the changes which gave me the most significant improvement. As per http://www.williambrownstreet.net/blog/?p=387, add the following kernel arguments to the GRUB boot configuration: pcie_aspm=force

Thanks, I'll look into that. (Though earlier you told me that debug info for types could be extended while walking the IR, so I wouldn't have thought that would have worked.) Peter On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:52:19PM -0800, David Blaikie wrote: > Will look more closely soon - but I'd really try just writing out type > units to MC as soon as they're done. It should be

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > The AA algorithm uses dataflow analysis to monitor the possible > propagation > > of those values through the program code, and it represents those flows > by > > updates to the may-point-to graph. If at some code point CP, a > may-point-to > > graph vertex "B" has

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:51 PM Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Feb 5, 2016, at 5:40 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 04:58:45PM -0800, Mehdi Amini wrote: > >> > >>> On Feb 5, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at

Thanks, John. This sounds reasonable that the analysis group just provides an interface to its implementors (pass). Then I have another question, is it allowed to specify multiple pass in the same analysis group in the command line for opt? If yes, which pass will be used for the call of getAnaysis<AnalysisGroup>()? -Thomson On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:34 PM, John Criswell <criswell at

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Feb 5, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:51 PM Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> > On Feb 5, 2016, at 5:40 PM, Peter Collingbourne

Hi, Rafael, Thanks a lot for the explanation! Could you explain a bit more (sorry I'm not from a compiler background)? So, what's the difference in the analysis perspective? What does "reading ELF files and archives" and "creating a list of symbols passed to llvm's internalize pass" do? I checked a little bit the corresponding .ll file generated according to the

Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 18:10, David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: >> From other discussion, it sounds like at least some people are open to >> asm tests under clang. I think that should be fine. But there are >> probably other kinds of end-to-end tests that should not live under >> clang. > >