Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Set Moderation Bit of corina s"
2010 Jan 17
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
I recompiled the LLVM-gcc with these options:
.../llvm-gcc4.2-2.6.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`/../install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/LLVM/llvm-2.6/ --enable-languages=c --disable-libssp --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --with-arch=armv7-a --target=arm-elf
It compiles successfuly.
make install.
But when compiling a file :
llvm-gcc a.c
Assembler messages:
Fatal error: Invalid
2010 Jan 17
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
Moreover,
../llvm-gcc4.2-2.6.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`/../install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/LLVM/llvm-2.6/ --enable-languages=c,c++
--with-gnu-ld=/home/arm/bin/arm-elf-ld
--with-gnu-as=/home/arm/bin/arm-elf-as
--with-arch=armv7
--target=arm-elf
and then make target=arm-elf gives the following error:
Unknown arch used in --with-arch=armv7
Thanks.
--- On Sun,
2010 Jan 16
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
OK, I put in my classpath the binaries from this package
arm-2005q3-1-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-pc-linux-gnu
futrhermore in the configure options I specified --with-gnu-ld and --with-gnu-as but I am getting the same error.
exec: 2: -meabi=4: not found
Any ideas?
--- On Sat, 1/16/10, corina s <corina_fff at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: corina s <corina_fff at yahoo.com>
Subject:
2010 Jan 18
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
Hello,
I recompiled binutils, llvm-gcc, libc, and again llvm-gcc and now it gives me the following error:
llvm-gcc --v
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-elf
Configured with:
......./ (reconfigured) ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.6.source/configure --target=arm-elf --enable-llvm=/home/LLVM/llvm-2.6/ --with-arch=armv7-a --enable-languages=c --prefix=/home/LLVM/install --enable-multilib --with-newlib
2010 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
>From where can I take them? And how modifies the compiling procedure?
Thank you,
Corina
--- On Fri, 1/15/10, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
To: "corina s" <corina_fff at yahoo.com>
Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at
2010 Jan 17
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
OK, thank you.
Are there some pre-built X86 binaries for LLVM-gcc for ARM? It yes, where can I download from?
Thank you,
Corina
--- On Sun, 1/17/10, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com> wrote:
From: Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
To: "corina s" <corina_fff at yahoo.com>
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, anton at
2010 Jan 17
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
Thanks for your tips. But I'm still getting errors.
.../llvm-gcc4.2-2.6.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`/../install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/LLVM/llvm-2.6/ --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gnu-ld=/home/arm/bin/arm-elf-ld
--with-gnu-as=/home/arm/bin/arm-elf-as
--with-cpu=cortex-a8
--target=arm-elf
Errors:
>>
checking for g++ that supports -ffunction-sections
2010 Jan 28
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
We have had a script for a while that does this for you in
http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/utils/crosstool/ARM/ .
It also uses the CodeSourcery toolchain so it saves you some effort.
Does that work for you?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Viktor Kutuzov
<vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com>wrote:
> Hello Corina,
>
> I used a two-stage sequence to build the llvm and llvm-gcc
2010 Jan 18
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
Hello Corina,
I used a two-stage sequence to build the llvm and llvm-gcc with the codesourcery toolchain and my custom built arm toolchain. There is some scripted chunks for each step. I have attached them as a single file to this email. May be it will help you somehow.
Viktor.
---
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of corina s [corina_fff at
2010 Jan 17
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
Hello,
Well, I recompiled the LLVM-gcc
.../llvm-gcc4.2-2.6.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`/../install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/LLVM/llvm-2.6/
--enable-languages=c
--disable-libssp
--with-gnu-ld=/home/LLVM/llvm-gcc4.2-2.6.source/arm-elf-ld --with-gnu-as=/home/LLVM/llvm-gcc4.2-2.6.source/arm-elf-as --with-cpu=cortex-a8
--target=arm-elf
Everything is OK, but when trying
2010 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
OK. I am getting now this error:
.../llvm-gcc4.2-2.6.source/configure
--prefix=`pwd`/../install --program-prefix=llvm-
--enable-llvm=/home/LLVM/llvm-2.6 --enable-languages=c,c++
--target=arm-eabi
exec: 2: -meabi=4: not found
make[4]: *** [crtbegin.o] Error 1
Thanks for your help,
Corina
--- On Fri, 1/15/10, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
From: Anton Korobeynikov
2010 Jan 18
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
hi,
So...
I followed the following steps in order to compile the llvm-gcc frontend. The single problem is that mentioned in the previous message:
llvm-gcc HelloWorld.c
/home/LLVM/install/lib/gcc/arm-elf/4.2.1/../../../../arm-elf/bin/ld: this linker was not configured to use sysroots
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
1. I have compiled the binutils for the arm-none-eabi target. Options:
2010 Jan 16
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
Can you be more specific?
Where can I found it(arm-eabi)? please provide me with some basic steps.
Thank you.
--- On Sat, 1/16/10, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
To: "corina s" <corina_fff at yahoo.com>
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Date: Saturday,
2011 Dec 07
2
[LLVMdev] Setting Moderator Bits
Dear All,
Are people setting the "moderated" bit on their subscriptions to
llvm-commits? I'm seeing several people who are subscribed but have
their moderated bit set, and so I keep seeing emails seeing that I need
to approve their posts.
-- John T.
2011 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] Setting Moderator Bits
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Are people setting the "moderated" bit on their subscriptions to
> llvm-commits? I'm seeing several people who are subscribed but have
> their moderated bit set, and so I keep seeing emails seeing that I need
> to approve their posts.
I think I'm one of such
2003 Jan 16
0
Moderation Question / Charset / Bugreport
Hello,
thanks for the great work, I have a question (Bug report?) concerning my
moderation with the Id 159045.
In the page "My Moderations" the new track name ist printed
"Wurstfachverkäuferin (Band)", which is wrong.
But when I look at the Moderation details I see "Wurstfachverkäuferin
Band)", which is right. (ä is a german "Umlaut", like ö ü Ä Ö Ü.)
2012 Nov 13
0
Xen Security Advisory 25 (CVE-2012-4544, CVE-2012-2625) - Xen domain builder Out-of-memory due to malicious kernel/ramdisk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Xen Security Advisory CVE-2012-4544,CVE-2012-2625 / XSA-25
version 2
Xen domain builder Out-of-memory due to malicious kernel/ramdisk
UPDATES IN VERSION 2
====================
Clarify that XSA-25 is reporting, via the Xen.org security process,
both CVE-2012-4544 and CVE-2012-2625.
Also we would like to
2010 Jan 16
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
Hello
> exec: 2: -meabi=4: not found
> make[4]: *** [crtbegin.o] Error 1
It seems you don't have cross-binutils for arm-eabi installed. Note
that ARM binutils are known to be buggy - you should use the fresh
CVS snapshot.
PS: Please use "Reply All" button - this way the copy will be sent to
llvm-dev ML and others will be able to comment / use the information
as well.
--
2001 May 20
0
Request for moderation: mailing lists winehq
Hello all,
we're seeking people that could do our mailing list moderation, since
we're getting about 15 to 20 spam bounces per day on our mailing lists
(wine-announce, wine-bugs, wine-cvs, wine-devel, wine-patches, wine-users).
Needless to say this amount has increased since we started doing it.
Currently Ove Kaaven and me do the moderation stuff for all the mails
that bounced due to the
2015 Feb 13
1
Thread moderation and list etiquette (Reference - Another Fedora Decision)
On 12/02/15 16:51, Brian Mathis wrote:
> Thanks for putting in the effort here. It's never a good situation to have
> to moderate, but sometimes it is necessary.
>
> From my perspective, this kind of thing happens far more often than the
> current example, though maybe not with such intensity. This situation
A large part of this is that some of the regular people are now