similar to: [LLVMdev] RFC: Technical Writing FAQ (DRAFT PROPOSAL)

Hi Guys, Unoffical patch for mech-plain so the AUTH PLAIN command works with SQL (and possibly other DBs). Thunderbird should work again after this. --- mech-plain.c 2004-12-10 01:56:51.065987304 +0000 +++ mech-plain.c 2004-12-10 01:53:16.974534152 +0000 @@ -27,7 +27,10 @@ authid = (const char *) data; authenid = NULL; pass = ""; - count = 0; +

Hello people! I have set up samba guided by "The Unoffical Samba HOWTO, by David Lechnyr". But for the last 3 hours i have been banging my head into the wall. So i ask for youre help! The problem is that the WinXP clients fails to join the domain with the error message: FROM WINXP: "The specified network password is not correct" FROM LOG: "[2003/01/29 23:27:03, 0]

Okay with the manual versus FAQ strategy. I just have to mention that languages like C++ has many FAQs all over the net, altogether totalling perhaps thousands of questions and I see C++ as simple compared to LLVM. But I have plenty to do now. If nothing else, I could try reading the manuals ;-) 2012/6/14 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:37 PM,

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > I think the best way that I can currently contribute to the project is > through technical writing. So I see myself as doing a serious, long-term > project of extending the FAQ. So, I can affirm that I want to really start > working :) Awesome. I was myself thinking of a number of FAQs: >

See http://mikepence.wordpress.com/2006/05/24/benjamin-gorlicks-ruby-documentation-project-wins-google-summer-of-code-grant/ Quoted here in full: Congratulations to Benjamin "theuncled" Gorlick ? a winner in Google''s Summer of Code contest. You may know Benjamin from his unoffical Ruby on Rails Blog or his tireless advocacy of Ruby and Rails within the community, but soon

Folks, I threatened to do this a few months ago.... Here's a first draft. I was thinking of it as something that might get posted the beginning of the month, or sent to someone who drops in with "it doesn't work!!!". PLEASE feel free, no, *please* rip, shred, tear, rend this, and help me make it usable. mark

I''m new in Rails, and I''m building my first application. I''m trying to make a FAQ for this application, organized by product (questions about each product) and category (questions of different categories or topics), and there is something I can''t figure it out how to do. I have these tables: create_table "faqs" do |t| t.column "question",

>> Unfortunately I can't test anymore until Friday. Maybe gnu-efi got >> updated? I seem to remember seeing a shell script pulling in the >> newest version during compilation... > > It's version locked to a certain commit ID. Okay, so that's good. No worries there. === preamble === In this mail I talk about two different commits. To identify them furhter,

For those interested in the actual file, it is now attached. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> Date: 2012/6/16 Subject: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) To: LLVMdev Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Here's the first part of my Windows set up documentation. This one only covers the process of

"Why did read.table stop reading my file" is a pretty FAQ, e.g. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.general/297406/focus=297409 (I could come up with a lot more examples if someone wanted). The answer is typically "check for spurious comment characters and unmatched quotation marks" Does this seem FAQ-worthy? Should I e-mail the FAQ maintainer and suggest it?

Here's the first part of my Windows set up documentation. This one only covers the process of setting up a normal box for building LLVM and Clang. A later document, which will follow in a few days, will cover how to set up a buildbot slave. As usual: I'm not a psychic, so if you have opinions regarding or suggestions on this document, please feel free to share them with me (on this

Hello, All: ????? I just posted a "Draft Proposal for improving the ability of R users to search R packages" to Wikiversity (https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Draft_Proposal_for_improving_the_ability_of_R_users_to_search_R_packages). ????? You are all invited to rewrite it in any way you think is more likely to produce the most useful result.? Wikimedia invites contributors to

Hi, I have submitted a draft proposal on the GSoC website but I also wanted to share my draft proposal through Dropbox to get your feedback quickly through it. Please review it and let me know your feedbacks as soon as possible. I haven't written much about automated testing as I haven't written any test yet ( I will learn writing automated tests before April end ). Link to my

Hi, Please give your feedbacks in the Google doc -> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wrbkD3OlhrmJZnrgcNyQrISwcQdTX2uJ9WDWiuO87g4/edit?usp=sharing . Regards, Ayush Pandey. On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Ayush Pandey < f2012714 at goa.bits-pilani.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > I have submitted a draft proposal on the GSoC website but I also > wanted to share my draft

Vikram, > If I understand right, Tilmann is proposing to create *front-ends* > from binary code in various architectures to LLVM, not back ends. Yes. AFAIK, currently QEMU disassembles source binary, converts instructions to "ops" (which is something like direct C equivalents of the instructions) and executes that "ops". The idea was to emit LLVM IR instead of that

I don't quite understand what you mean by "x86 IR code" or "IR level x86 code" -- can you please clarify? On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Janek van Oirschot via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I have created a first draft GSoC project proposal for a IR level > interpreter debugger. I have omitted some contact information as it

I've scanned over your proposal, but am not quite sure I understand your objective. Is your intent to be able to step through IR source in a debugger and inspect intermediate state? If so, you may consider whether "simply" inserting debug metatadata into your IR which describes the IR source, and then compiling it gives you your desired result. For the record, the current

On 03/25/2016 11:00 AM, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On 3/25/16 11:58 AM, Janek van Oirschot via llvm-dev wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> >> wrote: >>> On 03/25/2016 03:28 AM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev wrote: >>>> >>>> I've scanned over your proposal, but am not quite

Akemi, Thank for info, seems many developer are using ?centos-release-scl? these days, that makes life easier, however, it is little to governance the ?software source collection? if they are right or wrong. Anyway it is nice to know and thank you again! Xlord From: CentOS-docs [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Akemi Yagi Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 9:34 PM To:

?It's been a week, so I set up a place for you in HowTo: ?https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/php7 Akemi On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Thibaut Perrin <thibaut.perrin at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > How long should we wait to decide if we should publish it elsewhere ? > > Thanks, > > Thibaut > > On 27 October 2017 at 16:05, [-=X.L.O.R.D=-] <xlord.sl at