similar to: [LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages?"

2012 Jun 14
1
[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages?
btw, the "default reply-to-all" extension for gmail works great! On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer > you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. > > > 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> >
2012 Jun 14
2
[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages?
The irony of this reply is killing me :) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > You're not alone :) Don't let it bug you. > > I finally decided to install a GMail extension that enables reply-all for > all messages, because I kept forgetting. Perhaps you can find such an > extension or simply enable reply-all by default?
2012 Jun 14
0
[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages?
Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> > The irony of this reply is killing me :) > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> You're not alone :)
2013 Feb 12
0
[LLVMdev] Argument Lowering
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > I guess you could try to factor Clang's ABI code out. > Wasn't Dave Abrahams (CC'd) exploring in this direction? -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2013 Mar 24
1
[LLVMdev] About commit TILE-Gx backend to community repository and default disabled
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Jiong Wang <jiwang at tilera.com> wrote: > 于 2013/3/24 0:07, Joerg Sonnenberger 写道: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 04:59:49PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> >>> With Chris's reply you also got the general OK to upstream the >>> patch, _AFTER_ the actual patches have been reviewed. >>> >> One thing I was
2012 Jun 14
1
[LLVMdev] non-SSA IR generation
Well, it *is* in SSA form, but it "cheats" by keeping values in memory. --Sean Silva On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Jiesheng Wei <jwei at ece.ubc.ca> wrote: > Hi Amruth, > > If you do not specify any optimization flag for 'clang' and do not run > 'opt -mem2reg' pass on the generated IR file, it is in non-SSA form. > However, many variables stay
2012 Aug 04
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] GCC 4.7.2 will have Win64 SEH (by default)
+LLVMdev On Aug 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, João Matos wrote: > Charles Davis did a lot of work on Win64 SEH support in LLVM, check commits r131652-r132880. > > As I haven't tested it yet, what exactly is broken? It's not finished yet. All the stuff for assembly code that uses Win64 EH is done, but not the code-gen-side stuff (cf. Win64Exception class in CodeGen). I was about to
2006 Feb 24
2
H A T E
WAIT A MINUTE. You signed up for this mailing list to write that? -----Original Message----- From: flac-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:flac-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Dirk Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:51 AM To: flac@xiph.org Subject: [Flac] H A T E What retard did the Flac API? It looks like what CS students do short before they leave university to become consultants. It's bloated
2012 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] Mailing List archive navigation (was Re: svn mirror git?)
> Side note (perhaps for another email thread) fork'd > Side note (perhaps for another email thread): am I missing something, > or is the mailing list archive really that hard to link to the root of > a thread & navigate the /whole/ thread over all time? Every time I go > to the archive I find the fragment of a thread that occurred in a > given month & I can't
2013 Feb 06
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Using CMake/Ninja on buildbots
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > IMO, any functional/correctness difference between an incremental and > clean build should be considered a build system bug, If your (c)makefile underspecifies dependencies, there's nothing the build system can do. > especially for > C++ projects where incremental vs. clean can mean 10 second vs 30
2012 Dec 04
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM documentation work help
Sean, I add the empty file .nojekyll to https://github.com/Jonathan2251/lbd/tree/gh-pages and do "make gh-pages" again. It's the same. I check the uvbook has the gh-pages as mine as follows, https://github.com/nikhilm/uvbook/tree/gh-pages https://github.com/Jonathan2251/lbd/tree/gh-pages In addition to gh-pages, uvbook has the the other web site on
2012 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM documentation work help
You may need a ".nojekyll" file. uvbook has one < https://github.com/nikhilm/uvbook/blob/gh-pages/.nojekyll>. Also see < https://help.github.com/articles/files-that-start-with-an-underscore-are-missing >. Let me know if that doesn't work. -- Sean Silva On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:15 PM, gamma_chen <gamma_chen at yahoo.com.tw> wrote: > Sean, > > I can
2023 Dec 04
1
Mailing List Future
Frank Vanoni wrote: > On Mon, 2023-12-04 at 08:00 -0400, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > >> To that end, we’ve decided to discontinue the mailing lists effective >> February 1st, 2024. > That's a very sad news! :-( > Agree. Yet another giant step backward. Interesting that they will continue to send e-mails when postings to the (UGH) forum happen though. John Novack -- Dog
2012 Sep 21
2
[LLVMdev] yaml2obj.rst where to link? (Sphinx warns)
Also, why does it say yaml2py?: yaml2obj takes a YAML description of an object file and converts it to a binary file. $ yaml2py input-file .. program:: yaml2py --Sean Silva On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> Sphinx warns that yaml2obj
2012 Dec 04
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM documentation work help
Wei-Ren, Sorry, currently, I have an English helper in documentation. The cpu0 is my brother teaching material for college, and I did llvm backend compiler tutorial  for cpu0 since I didn't find a good tutorial in llvm backend design. As I know, there are many way to contribute back to open source or llvm. For example, write qemu for cpu0 is a extended work in cpu0 llvm backend design. Or
2012 Sep 21
0
[LLVMdev] yaml2obj.rst where to link? (Sphinx warns)
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Also, why does it say yaml2py?: > > yaml2obj takes a YAML description of an object file and converts it to a binary > file. > > $ yaml2py input-file > > .. program:: yaml2py > > --Sean Silva > Oops. Well, yaml kinda looks like Python... Feel free to fix that. - Michael Spencer
2006 Feb 24
0
H A T E
What retard did the Flac API? It looks like what CS students do short before they leave university to become consultants. It's bloated beyond all recognition. The Documentation sucks ass. There are no good examples. DO YOU HATE LISTENING TO MUSIC? What retard decided to start EVERYTHING with "FLAC__"? That's obscene! Please compare your shit with the elegant vorbis API and
2006 Feb 24
0
H A T E
What retard did the Flac API? It looks like what CS students do short before they leave university to become consultants. It's bloated beyond all recognition. The Documentation sucks ass. There are no good examples. DO YOU HATE LISTENING TO MUSIC? What retard decided to start EVERYTHING with "FLAC__"? That's obscene! Please compare your shit with the elegant vorbis API and
2006 Feb 24
0
H A T E
On Friday 24 February 2006 09:27, Liggatt, Keanon wrote: > WAIT A MINUTE. > > You signed up for this mailing list to write that? He obviously has emotional issues. He'd rather piss and moan than refactor and recompile the library to get what he wants. It's not like 5 letters is a big deal, and that's coming from someone who has had to work 8-20 hours a day at the
2008 May 13
0
Call retard from a softphone to a hardphone
Hi group I'm newbie on Asterisk so I followed the Linux Networking CookBook by Carla Schroder to make my first call. My asterisk box is on a Debian box with an public static IP. The clients (2) are with dynamic private IP's I'm using SJphone on a PC and a Linksys PAP2-NA to make calls between them. Both of them register well on my Asterisk server but when I call from the SJPhone to