Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt"
2012 Jun 12
2
[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt
Yes, I've tried and it did not work
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>wrote:
> Have you tried "opt -stats bitecode.bc > test.txt"?****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Rafael Parizi
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:36 AM
> *To:*
2012 Jun 12
1
[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt
I already did. What I need is to have this output in a txt file.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>wrote:
> Add an optimization level and you get information.****
>
> D:\ >opt -stats temp.bc -o tmp.bc2****
>
> ** **
>
> D:\ >opt -stats temp.bc -o tmp.bc2 -O3****
>
>
>
2012 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt
Have you tried "opt -stats bitecode.bc > test.txt"?
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Rafael Parizi
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:36 AM
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: [LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt
Hi!
I'm estimating the number of basic blocks of the a program using "opt -stats bitecode.bc"
I would
2012 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt
Add an optimization level and you get information.
D:\ >opt -stats temp.bc -o tmp.bc2
D:\ >opt -stats temp.bc -o tmp.bc2 -O3
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Statistics Collected ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
1 cgscc-passmgr - Maximum CGSCCPassMgr iterations on
2012 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] Assembly Mips from bitecode llvm
Ok. And what does llvm-gcc --version show?
---
With best regards,
Anton Korobeynikov
On Mar 6, 2012 5:22 PM, "Rafael Parizi" <parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For compile and link Basicmath files (using shell script):
>
> llvm-gcc -emit-llvm basicmath_small.c -c -o basicmath_small.bc
> llvm-gcc -emit-llvm cubic.c -c -o cubic.bc
> llvm-gcc -emit-llvm
2012 Mar 06
2
[LLVMdev] Assembly Mips from bitecode llvm
For compile and link Basicmath files (using shell script):
llvm-gcc -emit-llvm basicmath_small.c -c -o basicmath_small.bc
llvm-gcc -emit-llvm cubic.c -c -o cubic.bc
llvm-gcc -emit-llvm isqrt.c -c -o isqrt.bc
llvm-gcc -emit-llvm rad2deg.c -c -o rad2deg.bc
llvm-link basicmath_small.bc cubic.bc isqrt.bc rad2deg.bc -o basicmath.bc
2011 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
Hello,
I created a new block for execution to continue, but I got the case in which
a statement defined in a block is used in another, not dominate all uses.
For example:
entry:
%n_addr = alloca i32, align 4
%retval = alloca i32
%"alloca point" = bitcast i32 0 to i32
store i32 %n, i32* %n_addr
%0 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr inbounds ([20
x i8]*
2011 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
Ok! I do understand.
Thanks by help!
2011/9/5 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi <
> parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's how I'm doing now ... create a new block where the execution
>> flow will continue after the shift, following the basics of basic blocks.
2011 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
Yes, that's how I'm doing now ... create a new block where the execution
flow will continue after the shift, following the basics of basic blocks.
But, I want to find a way to reduce the number of block of my code.
2011/9/5 Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca>
> Rafael Baldiati Parizi wrote:
>
>> I have two values and I want see if them are equals. Then, I would a
>>
2011 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi <
parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that's how I'm doing now ... create a new block where the execution
> flow will continue after the shift, following the basics of basic blocks.
> But, I want to find a way to reduce the number of block of my code.
Why do you want to reduce the number of LLVM IR blocks?
2011 Sep 14
1
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
Sorry, %3 instead of %4.
2011/9/14 Rafael Baldiati Parizi <parizi.computacao at gmail.com>
> Hello,
> I created a new block for execution to continue, but I got the case in
> which a statement defined in a block is used in another, not dominate all
> uses.
> For example:
>
> entry:
> %n_addr = alloca i32, align 4
> %retval = alloca i32
> %"alloca
2011 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
Rafael Baldiati Parizi wrote:
> I have two values and I want see if them are equals. Then, I would a
> instruction like
> if Value1 != Value2, error
> without create a new block, continuing the execution in the same block,
> forcing the LLI to execute this.
You can not. The definition of a "basic block" is a sequence of
instructions with a single entry and a single exit.
2011 Sep 06
5
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
I have two values and I want see if them are equals. Then, I would a
instruction like
if Value1 != Value2, error
without create a new block, continuing the execution in the same block,
forcing the LLI to execute this.
2011/9/5 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi
> <parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
2012 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] Generate Executable to Mips
You will need to install a cross compiler.
I think you can find one somewhere in this link:
https://sourcery.mentor.com/GNUToolchain/
Once you have a cross compiler, this should do what you want (if you
want little-endian code):
clang -target mipsel-unknown-linux -ccc-clang-archs mipsel -O3
hello.c -o hello.bc -emit-llvm
llc -march=mipsel hello.bc -o hello.s
mips-linux-gnu-gcc hello.s -o hello
2012 Feb 27
0
[LLVMdev] Generate Executable to Mips
Thanks Akira,
it worked!
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> wrote:
> You will need to install a cross compiler.
> I think you can find one somewhere in this link:
> https://sourcery.mentor.com/GNUToolchain/
>
> Once you have a cross compiler, this should do what you want (if you
> want little-endian code):
>
> clang -target
2012 Feb 28
3
[LLVMdev] Generate Executable to Mips
There is also:
1) an alternate clang driver at
http://code.google.com/p/alternate-clang-driver/ . This makes
it more or less gcc compatible.
2) there is a way to invoke it all directly with just a call to clang as
is with x86/linux but it's not totally
finished. i will try and post something about this. the direct form will
work if you are on a
mips linux machine but there are still some
2012 Mar 06
2
[LLVMdev] Assembly Mips from bitecode llvm
Hi,
I'm trying to compile the benchmarks from Mibench suite with the
application of the all LLVM's tranformation passes.
Moreover, I'm trying to generate assembly code for Mips architecture for
extraction of energy and performance metrics.
For this, for example, initially I compile the sources and link them
generating a bitecode file. After, I apply each optimization using opt tool:
2012 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] Generate Executable to Mips
This is true?
*clang*/*llvm* *cannot* produce *mips* object *code* or executable (yet).
from:
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-get-MIPS-from-clang-%2B-llvm---td32822926.html
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Rafael BP <parizi.computacao at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
> How can I generate executable to mips with llvm-gcc.
> I'm using Ilvm-2.9, X86PC and the following commands:
>
>
2012 Feb 28
0
[LLVMdev] Generate Executable to Mips
Great Job!
If I use alternate-clang-driver, will I need mips-gcc still?
I mean alternate-clang-driver use as&ld directly or by calling gcc?
Regards,
Jia Liu
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:
> There is also:
>
> 1) an alternate clang driver at
> http://code.google.com/p/alternate-clang-driver/ . This makes
> it more or less gcc
2011 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi
<parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have two values and I want see if them are equals. Then, I would a
> instruction like
> if Value1 != Value2, error
> without create a new block, continuing the execution in the same block,
> forcing the LLI to execute this.
You can't do that; a br instruction must be at the