similar to: [LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang

Just in case another person comes to get stuck on this on Mac OS: http://web.mit.edu/mfloyd/www/computing/mac/gv/ This link explains the process on getting gv installed since Xaw3d dependency even has a 'error' (actually missing few parameters) on a line that prevents code compilation that needs to be fixed before configuring and make it works. -- I have gv installed now and my bash

Hi Joey, I think there is still something missing. I ignored the -j as you mentioned and saw on the documentation that to compile on debug mode I could do so using: $./configure --disable-optimized As a result by the end I compiled llvm2.9 I got: llvm[0]: ***** Completed Debug Build llvm[0]: ***** Note: Debug build can be 10 times slower than an llvm[0]: ***** optimized build. Use make

Hi Alex, Would you recommend any specific link in respect on how to compile in debug mode? I downloaded the Mac OS version on the website so I did not compile anything. I am sort of a rookie on bash but I should be able to figure my way around this. Also, is there any particular reason why this functionality is only available on debug mode? Thank you so much for the fast reply, was driving me

Hi Joey! Thanks I just replied your message on stack and I was actually looking into this right now. Is this the option? I just wanted to confirm: - make [-j] - The -j specifies the number of jobs (commands) to run simultaneously. This builds both LLVM and Clang for Debug+Asserts mode. The --enabled-optimized configure option is used to specify a Release build. The -j parameter is

Hi Joey, Still the same message. I am running it from llvm-2.9/Debug/bin/clang -cc1 -ast-view ~/smd.c Is this where you were referring to? Best, Carlos Andrade http://carlosandrade.co 2012/6/9 Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> > You need to run the clang from the build directory. Something like > ./Debug+Asserts/bin/clang > > Joey > > > On 9 June 2012 22:52,

Just to add one more thing. I have been trying to install the gv on my mac os but I have not been successful either. The gv build requires xaw3d ( http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Xaw3d ) which apparently has not been updated for quite few years and the download is not even available anymore. Carlos Andrade http://carlosandrade.co 2012/6/9 Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com> > Hi

You need to run the clang from the build directory. Something like ./Debug+Asserts/bin/clang Joey On 9 June 2012 22:52, Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com> wrote: > Just in case another person comes to get stuck on this on Mac OS: > > http://web.mit.edu/mfloyd/www/computing/mac/gv/ > > This link explains the process on getting gv installed since Xaw3d > dependency

Hi, The -j option just says how many processes are started to parallelise the build. The default option is to build Debug+Asserts, so unless you add any extra arguments when you run './configure', you should be fine! Joey On 9 June 2012 21:29, Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Joey! > > Thanks I just replied your message on stack and I was actually

Hi Carlos, You can just download the source code from http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#2.9 and then read http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html which should tell you how to compile it. Joey On 9 June 2012 21:10, Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Would you recommend any specific link in respect on how to compile in > debug mode? I

Hi Carlos, > I am new to this list, and hope this question is pertinent to this mailing > list. Welcome! > Stmt::viewAST is only available in debug builds on systems with Graphviz or > gv! You need to actually build Clang in debug mode for this particular method to be available, which is very likely why you're seeing this error. I don't think that Clang builds shipped with

Hi, I have been searching everywhere for an implementation of those algorithms, but I have only observed them in Matlab and on the literature. I noticed a package called 'ada' in CRAN but it is not for multi class. I would be happy with just Adaboost.m2, Smoteboost over adaboost.m2 or any other combination that could account for imbalanced multiclass classification problems. Thanks!

Edwin, thank you for your effort, but I'm not sure I understand. Are you describing a graph traversal problem? Is the data model stored in a predecessor/successor fashion, which requires you to 'walk' the graph in order to visit all nodes? (and what happens when you have disjointed DFGs?). inline comments follow... Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-09-06 17:30, Ioannis Nousias

On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I > want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are > chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling > certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when > invoking the compiler

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:17 +0100, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I > > want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are > > chained together. The documentation mentions

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1291 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1291.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 9812d525ecf3118212738fef6c4d38695ea1fe156850a21742ded07e27f85c5d graphviz-2.26.0-10.el6.i686.rpm

Hi I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when invoking the compiler (I've seen some -print-cfg and -dot-cfg options mentioned in some source files,

Hi all, I am trying to compile Rgraphiz on Windows 7 64bit with R-2.13.0. I have installed Rtools213.exe from [1]. The 64bit packages in [2] provided me with the 64 bit version of graphviz. After intalling the binary version Rgraphviz 1.30 (in 32bit) it complains (as expected) that: > library(Rgraphviz) Error: package 'Rgraphviz' is not installed for 'arch=x64' I

So, Anyone playing with the graph files yet? Just wondering if anyone has discovered a really good set of parameters to pass to dot to get the best looking graphs (OmniGraffle looks nice but I don''t want to pay for anything and want a way to generate graphics from the command-line). -- DK

On 2009-09-06 19:57, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Edwin, > > thank you for your effort, but I'm not sure I understand. > Are you describing a graph traversal problem? Is the data model stored > in a predecessor/successor fashion, which requires you to 'walk' the > graph in order to visit all nodes? (and what happens when you have > disjointed DFGs?). Sorry for the

Edwin, thanks, it starts making sense inline comments... Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-09-06 19:57, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > >> Edwin, >> >> thank you for your effort, but I'm not sure I understand. >> Are you describing a graph traversal problem? Is the data model stored >> in a predecessor/successor fashion, which requires you to 'walk' the