similar to: [LLVMdev] Final Windows MinGW buildbot slave document...

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the final, confirmed working version of my Windows guide for how to > set up a MinGW buildbot slave. Please consider to include it in the > documentation on the LLVM website. > > Basically, it saves the newcoming Windows user about two or three days of >

Hi all, Here's an updated version of my proposed "Building with MinGW on Windows" document. In summary, the document gives a step-by-step description of how to build LLVM + Clang on Windows WITHOUT having Microsoft Visual Studio installed. The high-level goal of the document is to make life pleasant for those wonderful Windows users who desire to try out LLVM and/or Clang. I

Okay, I'll go with a stable Clang like v3.3. Have to build it myself, though, as Debian comes with v3.0. No, I didn't try using libstdc++. I'll give it a shot. The machine is going to be turned on 24/7 until it dies from old age, so I don't know if it is worth scheduling in a special manner. The worst part is linking as I cannot use Gold because I get an error about an

On 18 November 2013 13:25, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Okay, I'll go with a stable Clang like v3.3. Have to build it myself, > though, as Debian comes with v3.0. > > No, I didn't try using libstdc++. I'll give it a shot. Is the machine running OS X or linux? Note that the libstdc++ on OS X (4.2) is probably too old to use c++11, which is

I'm in the process of configuring a Mac Mini G4 (PowerPC, big-endian) to be an LLD buildbot slave, as there were some who wanted a big-endian tester of LLD. I have a few quick questions with respect to that: 1. LLD appears to be built using Clang, but Clang is not built as part of the LLD build. So which version of Clang should I use? v3.3 or any nightly build of Clang. Is it enough that

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi all, > >     3. The document now covers 32-bit and 64-bit builds with MinGW tools (if > anybody know of an alternate BINARY distribution of MinGW64 than Drangon's > release, please let me know so I can include it in the document). As was once explained to me by Ruben Van Boxem, what you

On 11/18/2013 11:57 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > I'm in the process of configuring a Mac Mini G4 (PowerPC, big-endian) to be > an LLD buildbot slave, as there were some who wanted a big-endian tester of > LLD. > > I have a few quick questions with respect to that: > > 1. LLD appears to be built using Clang, but Clang is not built as part of > the LLD build. So which

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > http://llvm.lyngvig.org/Articles/How-to-Setup-an-Arch-Linux-Buildbot-for-LLVM > Notice: You only need Ninja for the test build; none of the official LLVM builders use Ninja as far as I know. My buildbots use ninja. > Please notice that you must specify the absolute path to ninja, otherwise CMake

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Renato, > > My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No > reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after > I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or > perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)?

It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a starving bee. I guess I should get used to using the Sphinx layout; I'm simply more familiar with the format I use on my own websites. Have you guys ever considered making a less formal wiki for LLVM documentation - a place where tiny

I'll use a redirection to the new article then. Did you try out the .htaccess thingy we talked about on LLVM.org? It should work, without any webmaster's assistance. 2013/11/21 Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> Hi Renato, >> >> My XU is on build

On 17 November 2013 05:15, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > I finally got it to work - and my ODROID-XU is now a passive member of the > LLVM builder society for the next week or so, until it has proven itself > (it monitors changes to the SVN repository and builds in my end without > bothering anyone at LLVM.org about its findings). I did write up a

Thanks for spotting those errors! Fixed. If you feel that this doc should be part of the LLVM documentation, perhaps in a revised form, just let me know. I am willing to convert it into reST and also to go through a peer review, but I simply cannot spend hundreds of hours munging about, rewriting, and retesting over and over as I am already busy on other documentation and other sub-projects.

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. >> It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a >> starving bee. I

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Thanks for spotting those errors! Fixed. > > If you feel that this doc should be part of the LLVM documentation, > perhaps in a revised form, just let me know. I am willing to convert it > into reST and also to go through a peer review, but I simply cannot spend > hundreds of hours munging

On 14 November 2013 17:43, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Renato, thanks for your elaborate walk-through of the issues with ARM > boards. I'm trying to add some of this to the "How to Build on ARM" > document and will submit a patch later on. > Nice, thanks! That would be great! Unfortunately, my personal budget does not allow me more than a

Hi Renato, My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)? I will have to move it sometime because it is somewhat noise once it begins to build. Do you know if I can plug in

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > StackOverflows says two things: > > 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= > http://example.com/" />. > 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends > server redirects. > > It seems that LLVM.org is served by

Thanks for your extensive answer! I now better understand the processes involving LLVM and Clang. I figured you were like most FOSS projects: A group of dudes working more or less together towards a common objective and therefore wanted to try to tune that objective. I have contributed a Mingw64 Windows buildbot slave that fails predictably in 29 tests on each build, and I will happily offer

StackOverflows says two things: 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= http://example.com/" />. 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends server redirects. It seems that LLVM.org is served by Apache 2.2.22 running on Ubuntu. In that case, the .htaccess file should make it possible to do server redirects: