Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Constant::getAllOnesValue(): expected behaviour or bug?"
2011 Feb 10
1
[LLVMdev] PR9112
Hello,
This simple patch fixes PR9112:
Index: lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp (revision 125281)
+++ lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp (working copy)
@@ -593,6 +593,8 @@
// Otherwise take the unions of the known bit sets of the operands,
// taking conservative care to avoid
2012 May 21
3
[LLVMdev] Bug in SUB expansion going back to LLVM 2.6
I found a bug in the expansion code for SUB going back to at least LLVM 2.6 and still shows up in trunk.
case ISD::SUB: {
EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0);
assert(TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::ADD, VT) &&
TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::XOR, VT) &&
"Don't know how to expand this subtraction!");
Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::XOR, dl,
2012 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Bug in SUB expansion going back to LLVM 2.6
On May 21, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote:
> I found a bug in the expansion code for SUB going back to at least LLVM 2.6 and still shows up in trunk.
> case ISD::SUB: {
> EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0);
> assert(TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::ADD, VT) &&
> TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::XOR, VT) &&
> "Don't
2005 Aug 10
1
[LLVMdev] ValueTy not set appropriately in Value.h?
Hi, for some temporary debugging I wanted to know what sort of Value I
was seeing, and I ran across this comment in Value.h - it's probably a
minor point, but unless I'm missing something I think either the last
line of the comment is wrong or the code is.
It appears in rev 1.58, as part of fixing bug 122.
00134 /// getValueType - Return an ID for the concrete type of this
object.
2008 May 28
3
[LLVMdev] Possible VirtRegMap Bug
I've been playing around with spillers and found that the SimpleSpiller fails
badly on a particular code.
The problem arises because SimpleSpiller does the test
VRM.isAssignedReg(virtReg) which is implemented as:
00183 bool isAssignedReg(unsigned virtReg) const {
00184 if (getStackSlot(virtReg) == NO_STACK_SLOT &&
00185 getReMatId(virtReg) == NO_STACK_SLOT)
2008 May 30
0
[LLVMdev] Possible VirtRegMap Bug
On May 27, 2008, at 5:36 PM, David Greene wrote:
> I've been playing around with spillers and found that the
> SimpleSpiller fails
> badly on a particular code.
>
> The problem arises because SimpleSpiller does the test
> VRM.isAssignedReg(virtReg) which is implemented as:
>
> 00183 bool isAssignedReg(unsigned virtReg) const {
> 00184 if
2015 Jan 20
2
[LLVMdev] Bug in InsertElement constant propagation?
Does anybody else have an opinion on this issue? I'm planning to submit a patch which would add a new get method for ConstantDataVector taking an ArrayRef<Constant*> and use that in the few places in constant propagation where convertToFloat is used.
Let me know if you think there is a more obvious way to do it.
Right now the only way to create a ConstantDataVector are those method:
2015 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Bug in InsertElement constant propagation?
I don't see a way to create a ConstantDataVector from Constant or form APFloat though. Did I oversee that?
Is the solution to had a new get function in ConstantDataVector to allow that? Any hint on what would be the right fix otherwise?
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Roelofs [mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 10:30 AM
To: Raoux, Thomas
2004 Jan 23
1
ipfw + named problem
Ok, I am really stumped on this one. I setup ipfw with all my rules.
Everything works great except for dns. If I do nslookup I get
-su-2.05b# nslookup yahoo.com
Server: localhost.webspacesolutions.com
Address: 127.0.0.1
*** localhost.webspacesolutions.com can't find yahoo.com: Non-existent
host/domain
This is what I have in my ipfw.rules
add 00310 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via
2017 Apr 08
3
How to insert vector type input parameter for function in C/C++ API?
Fantastic! It's working! Thank you so much Craig!!!
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote:
> It should be VectorType::get(Type::getInt32Ty(Context),4). You need the
> word "get" after VectorType::
>
> ~Craig
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Michael Choi <choimichael103 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
2004 Jul 28
3
Ipfw config
If someone has some free time, can you go over my ipfw config. See if I
have any problems, or things i should add. Im not an ipfw expert or
anything. Here is the config.
add 100 allow all from any to any via lo0
add 110 deny log all from any to 127.0.0.0/8
add 120 deny log ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
add 00200 check-state
add 00250 deny all from any to any frag in via bge0
add 00260 deny
2011 May 24
2
Data Frame housekeeping
Hello,
I have a large data frame that is organized by date in a peculiar way. I
am seeking advice on how to transform the data into a format that is of
more use to me.
The data is organized as follows:
STN_ID YEAR MM ELEM X1 X2 X3 X4
X5 X6 X7
1 2402594 1997 9 1 *-00233* *-00204* *-00119* -00190 -00251
-00243 -00249
2 2402594
2004 Jan 23
0
FW: ipfw + named problem
forgot this addr.
--
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder
Elvandar.org/DSINet.org
www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the
hackerscene
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Remko Lodder [mailto:remko@elvandar.org]
Verzonden: vrijdag 23 januari 2004 10:53
Aan: Nick Twaddell
Onderwerp: RE: [Freebsd-security] ipfw + named problem
did you tcpdump the packets so that you can
2019 Jul 30
0
Re: [PATCH libnbd] lib: Remove cookie parameter from completion callbacks.
On 7/30/19 10:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> As discussed in this thread, the parameter is an invitation to write
> code with race conditions:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/thread.html#00309
> ---
> +++ b/generator/generator
> @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ C<nbd_pread>.";
> default_call with
> args = [ BytesPersistOut
2015 May 28
0
Statistician for The Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN in Rome, Italy
Job Description:
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations based in
Rome is seeking a talented statistician to join the Statistics division.
We value people with technical skills, and in particular individuals who
are able to translate numbers to actions and to make an impact on the world.
In this role, you will be:
-?? Developing R methods in collaboration with FAO
2008 Apr 16
8
Will acts_as_taggable_on_steroids and better_nested_set work together?
I am having this crazy problem where it ONLY shows up in testing.
This is my test code
<code>
def test_should_destroy
task1 = Task.new(:description => "tmp",
:done => false,
:user => User.find_by_login(''admin''))
assert task1.save
assert task1.destroy
end
</code>
This is my task model
2019 Jul 30
3
[PATCH libnbd] lib: Remove cookie parameter from completion callbacks.
As discussed in this thread, the parameter is an invitation to write
code with race conditions:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/thread.html#00309
---
docs/libnbd.pod | 6 +-
examples/glib-main-loop.c | 10 ++--
examples/strict-structured-reads.c | 2 +-
generator/generator | 57
2004 Dec 14
0
Codec "Uknown" with IAX connection
I am having some problems getting TelIax service to work with *. Outbound
calls work just fine. When I try an inbound call the phone rings and there
is no audio. Upon further investigation "iax2 show channels" indicates
that the codec is "unknown" The provider confirmed that they are set for
ulaw and so am I. Does anyone have an idea what could be causing the codecs
to
2012 Apr 20
2
[LLVMdev] CriticalAntiDepBreaker rewrites a register operand of a call instruction
I am running into a problem when I turn on post-RA scheduler with mode
"ANTIDEP_CRITICAL" for mips.
I'd appreciate if someone could explain what is going wrong here.
This is the basic block before post RA scheduling (at
PostRASchedulerList.cpp:322):
*(gdb)
#3 0x0000000000ed3d26 in runOnMachineFunction (this=0x20aa470, Fn=...)
at lib/CodeGen/PostRASchedulerList.cpp:322
322
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction
> and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you
> anticipating something more