similar to: [LLVMdev] Buildbot: Use CMake instead of configure?

Hi Dmitri, I am not using any kind of cache (didn't even know of ccache). I have now installed ccache. Perhaps ccache should be mentioned in the buildbot document so that every buildbot owner knows about it? It is currently running Arch Linux ARM. if there are good reasons to switch to something else, I'll be happy to do that, although I am generally very happy about Arch Linux.

Hi, I've noticed on both PCs and ARM boards that it is the linking process that "brings down" the system (makes it swap if it is not equipped with plenty of RAM). So I have been thinking if it would be possible to use the CMake pool feature to make the LLVM build system only issue one link command at a time - it seems a bit unfortunate that N simultaneous link commands are issued

On 14 November 2013 17:43, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Renato, thanks for your elaborate walk-through of the issues with ARM > boards. I'm trying to add some of this to the "How to Build on ARM" > document and will submit a patch later on. > Nice, thanks! That would be great! Unfortunately, my personal budget does not allow me more than a

I finally got it to work - and my ODROID-XU is now a passive member of the LLVM builder society for the next week or so, until it has proven itself (it monitors changes to the SVN repository and builds in my end without bothering anyone at LLVM.org about its findings). I did write up a "short" treatise on how to do it, in case anybody needs to do this sometime in the future. I expect

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Renato, > > My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No > reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after > I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or > perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)?

On 17 November 2013 05:15, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > I finally got it to work - and my ODROID-XU is now a passive member of the > LLVM builder society for the next week or so, until it has proven itself > (it monitors changes to the SVN repository and builds in my end without > bothering anyone at LLVM.org about its findings). I did write up a

Okay, I'll go with a stable Clang like v3.3. Have to build it myself, though, as Debian comes with v3.0. No, I didn't try using libstdc++. I'll give it a shot. The machine is going to be turned on 24/7 until it dies from old age, so I don't know if it is worth scheduling in a special manner. The worst part is linking as I cannot use Gold because I get an error about an

Hi, Here's the final, confirmed working version of my Windows guide for how to set up a MinGW buildbot slave. Please consider to include it in the documentation on the LLVM website. Basically, it saves the newcoming Windows user about two or three days of experimentation to get it all working. I think those days are important as many people balk at spending days on figuring out how to get

I'll use a redirection to the new article then. Did you try out the .htaccess thingy we talked about on LLVM.org? It should work, without any webmaster's assistance. 2013/11/21 Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> Hi Renato, >> >> My XU is on build

Hi guys, I have this ODROID XU (quad-core ARMv7 Cortex A15 1,6 GHz) box that I want to make available to the LLVM project. I can see that LLVM already has an ARMv7 Cortex A9 system doing Clang, but how should this box be used, if at all? We're talking a long-term commitment within the realm of being a buildbot slave. It builds LLVM in about 40 minutes, excluding the test suite.

Hi Renato, My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)? I will have to move it sometime because it is somewhat noise once it begins to build. Do you know if I can plug in

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Dmitri, > > I am not using any kind of cache (didn't even know of ccache). I have now > installed ccache. Perhaps ccache should be mentioned in the buildbot > document so that every buildbot owner knows about it? Possibly. > It is currently running Arch Linux ARM. if there are good

Hi, I am trying to add a PowerPC/GNU LLD builder. Therefore I am building manually until everything is fine and I can link the builder into Zorg. It almost completed but then I got this error: [ 97%] Building CXX object tools/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/X86_64/CMakeFiles/lldX86_64ELFTarget.dir/X86_64LinkingContext.cpp.o

On 18 November 2013 13:25, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Okay, I'll go with a stable Clang like v3.3. Have to build it myself, > though, as Debian comes with v3.0. > > No, I didn't try using libstdc++. I'll give it a shot. Is the machine running OS X or linux? Note that the libstdc++ on OS X (4.2) is probably too old to use c++11, which is

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the final, confirmed working version of my Windows guide for how to > set up a MinGW buildbot slave. Please consider to include it in the > documentation on the LLVM website. > > Basically, it saves the newcoming Windows user about two or three days of >

I'm in the process of configuring a Mac Mini G4 (PowerPC, big-endian) to be an LLD buildbot slave, as there were some who wanted a big-endian tester of LLD. I have a few quick questions with respect to that: 1. LLD appears to be built using Clang, but Clang is not built as part of the LLD build. So which version of Clang should I use? v3.3 or any nightly build of Clang. Is it enough that

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have this ODROID XU (quad-core ARMv7 Cortex A15 1,6 GHz) box that I want > to make available to the LLVM project. I can see that LLVM already has an > ARMv7 Cortex A9 system doing Clang, but how should this box be used, if at > all? We're talking a long-term commitment

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Thanks for spotting those errors! Fixed. > > If you feel that this doc should be part of the LLVM documentation, > perhaps in a revised form, just let me know. I am willing to convert it > into reST and also to go through a peer review, but I simply cannot spend > hundreds of hours munging

A quick question while I am adding a tiny section on ccache to the HowToAddABuilder document: Why do you set CCACHE_CPP2 to yes? From reading the manual, I get the impression that this is much slower than the default and that it should only be used with tricky compilers or when debugging. Is Clang such a tricky compiler? If so, I suppose Clang should be fixed, not the ccache configuration. --

That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or should I just grab them using wget? 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd > like > > to begin gradually extending