similar to: [LLVMdev] LTO for smaller memory footprint for Clang

I guess I miss-interpreted the text in [2]. It talks about the optimizations are hindered if the compiler driver invokes link time optimizer "separately". I found that all files compiled are in bc format. Also in library archives, the embedded files were in bitcode format. So the gold linker and LLVMgold plugin are indeed working fine. However, there is still question over only 6% gain

Hi, unfortunately, my build somehow hangs when linking clang binary and my system is in an unusable state. My toolchain is clang-3.8, gold-1.11 and LLVMgold.so from binutils v2.26.1 (both selfmade) and LTO-flag is enabled. My buildsystem uses cmake-3.6.0 and ninja-1.7.1 (both prebuilt). I have 52 last steps left in my 3rd build. My Linux-kernel is v3.13.0-92 from official Ubuntu repositories.

Hi Ahmad, Yes, merging works good. However, my problem is like this - I have a C library which consists of 1000's of functions spread through various files. The functions do not have dependency amoung each other. I want to link only relavant files( files which have functions called from my application). Since ar has a global symbol table, I believe it should be faster to look for a symol in

Hi, I tried to build an llvm archive and link it against an llvm bc file. However, it fails. Following is the procedure I followed ( abc.c is file which calls a function whose definition is present in bcd.c) $ clang -c -emit-llvm abc.c $ clang -c -emit-llvm bcd.c $ llvm-ar cr bsd.ar bcd.o $ llvm-link abc.o bsd.ar llvm-link: bsd.ar:1:2: error: expected integer !<arch> ^ llvm-link:

How big is your project? LTO eats RAM even faster than chrome. For example linking clang with LTO could take 16GB of ram. Have you tried using LTO on your project on that machine, or is it your first time? Piotr On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at

Hi Guy, Thanks a lot for the clarification. I tried using the triple for SPIR as $ clang -x cl -fno-builtin -emit-llvm -c -Xclang -triple -Xclang spir-unknown-unknown Simple_Kernel.cl However I get the following error. error: unknown target triple 'spir-unknown-unknown', please use -triple or -arch I also tried with triple nvptx-unknown-unknown clang -x cl -fno-builtin -emit-llvm -S

Hi, I am unable to download videos from the site http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-04-12/. The response I always get is Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 503 Service Unavailable 2012-06-06 12:00:14 ERROR 503: Service Unavailable. If possible, please share the videos on other medium ( youtube etc.) too. This will spare LLVM web server from heavy traffic due to video downloads too. Thanks and

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> wrote: > There are plans to upload, when Chandler has the time. The YouTube account > is LLVMProject. > Should get them up this week. Sorry I didn't even remember to do it after they were posted! > Joey > On Jun 6, 2012 8:45 AM, "ankur deshwal" <a.s.deshwal at gmail.com> wrote: >

Hi, I was trying to use the following code in a if condition I->getOperand(0)->hasName() where I is an instruction with following condition already true - I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Call When I compiled a C code with llvm-2.9, I see a function call with no operand name (for operand 0) . This happens for a function with varArgs. The interesting part is that the same C code when

Hi Ankur, Why do you need archive in this case? The other way of doing this is to merge all bitcode files into single file: $ clang -c -emit-llvm abc.c -o abc.bc $ clang -c -emit-llvm bcd.c -o bcd.bc llvm-link bcd.bc abc.bc -o merged.bc Cheers, Ahmad From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of ankur deshwal Sent: 21 February 2013 17:54 To:

Hi, Is there any way to get a pointer to the LLVM Instr from which a particular MachineInstr is generated ? Although I understand it goes through many optimization after a LLVM instruction is converted to SDAG node, so maintaining such a mapping will be hard. Still is the mapping stored some where which can give some sane results at least in case of -O0? Thanks and regards, Ankur

> On Jul 23, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Piotr Padlewski <prazek at google.com <mailto:prazek at google.com>> wrote: >> How big is your project? >> LTO eats RAM even faster than chrome. For example linking clang with LTO >>

Hello everyone, Thanks a lot for the help. -target nvptx worked great with llvm-3.2. However it gives error with -target spir. LLVM/Clang trunk although works good for both options ( probably because spir is still work in progress ). Thanks again. - Ankur On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Benyei, Guy <guy.benyei at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Jordan,**** > > You’re right, and

Hi Mehdi, The llvm3.8 gold-plugin.cpp is very different from the latest one on trunk. Your patch has compiling failure on llvm3.8 as below. I will try it on latest trunk later. Thank you help anyway! Building CXX object tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/gold-plugin.cpp.o cd /home/jshi19/llvm38releasebuild/tools/gold && /home/jshi19/clang38/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0

Hi all! I played around with the LLVM LTO example(https://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html#example-of-link-time-optimization), but got some questions. As the document says, the function foo4 should be removed. However, under my test, function foo4 is not removed. I have tried both gnu ld with LLVMgold.so and lld, neither of them removes function foo4. I compile and run the example as

> On May 17, 2016, at 1:33 AM, Shi, Steven via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello, > Let me ask a LTO simple question again. For the llvm LTO example in the link:http://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html <http://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html>, I use below build commands to generate three different optimization level binary: -O0, -O1, -O2.

There are plans to upload, when Chandler has the time. The YouTube account is LLVMProject. Joey On Jun 6, 2012 8:45 AM, "ankur deshwal" <a.s.deshwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am unable to download videos from the site > > http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-04-12/. > > The response I always get is > > Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 503 Service

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:35 AM, ankur deshwal <a.s.deshwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to use the following code in a if condition > I->getOperand(0)->hasName() > > where I is an instruction with following condition already true - > I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Call > > When I compiled a C code with llvm-2.9, I see a function call with

GCC LTO works ok for the test case with both bfd and gold linker. David On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> >> wrote:

The videos are OK now. Except the video of "Autovectorization with LLVM" that have a little mistake with "_" and "-" in the filenames. Thank you. 2012/6/6 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> There are plans to upload, when Chandler has the time.