similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM test a pass

Hi, The LLVM has a good test suite. I recommend it. You can test your pass with single-source programs and multi-source programs. You can also configure the test-suite to run your test with external benchmarks within the LLVM test suite. You can also run some programs after you use your pass, to verify if your pass don't affect the behavior of the compiled program. You can do it with the

Hi, I'm writing a pass that implements a jump table with an array of blockaddress and an indirectbr instruction. It get a blockaddress in the array (via getelementptr and an index) and then jump to this basicblock via the indirectbr. I tried to compile several libraries to test my pass and the run their test-suite. It works fine with, for e.g, libTomCrypt (in -O0,1,2,3). With GMP or

> On 24 Mar 2015, at 14:55, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Rinaldini Julien > <julien.rinaldini at heig-vd.ch> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to *tag* some functions with some *flags*. I was using annotate((“myFlag”)) and everything was working fine until I tried on ObjC method. It seems that clang just

Hi, I have a question about the llvm passes. I'm iterating over a basicblock and I can get an instruction and print it. Now, I want to iterate over the instruction and be able to modify the values of the instruction. For example, if my instruction is an add "<result> = add i32 4, %var" I want to transform it in a sub "<result> = sub i32 4, %var". I looked up

Hi, I'm trying to detect if a basicblock is part of a loop or not. I tried the llvm::LoopInfo like that (http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1LoopInfo.html#a4abca289c73cd09487e05d11d9f7d877): LoopInfo *loop = new LoopInfo(); bool isLoop = loop->getLoopFor(myBB); // getLoopFor - Return the inner most loop that BB lives in. If a basic block is in no loop (for example the entry

Rinaldini, What exactly did you run? Specifically, you may be missing some analysis passes that are necessary for LoopInfo to have the loop information you desire. -Hal On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:02:04 +0000 Rinaldini Julien <julien.rinaldini at heig-vd.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to detect if a basicblock is part of a loop or not. > > I tried the llvm::LoopInfo

>> // Increment loop variable and jmp >> BuildMI(*MBB_erase, MBB_erase->end(), db, >> TII->get(X86::ADD64ri32),reg).addReg(reg).addImm(8); > > It looks like this instruction is defining virtual register "reg" the second time. Thx for your answer... Why would it define it again? I just want to use this register and add something to it... Cheers

> De : 陳韋任 [chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw] > Date d'envoi : mardi 8 mai 2012 11:37 > À : Rinaldini Julien > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Objet : Re: [LLVMdev] RE : svn trunk comilation error > > Hi Rinaldini, > > You probably need to illustrate what your enviroment is, what revision you > checkout and how you build LLVM. I have no problem build LLVM svn here.

Hi Rinaldini, In order to find information about loops inside a given function you should use something like "LoopInfo *LI = P->getAnalysis<LoopInfo>()", remembering to add "AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>();" to your getAnalysisUsage method. If the function you are interested to is not located in the module being compiled (if you created it as an auxiliary function,

Hi, I want to *tag* some functions with some *flags*. I was using annotate((“myFlag”)) and everything was working fine until I tried on ObjC method. It seems that clang just ignore it. So, to be able to *flag* my functions I’m trying to add a *real* attribute to clang. I’ve added a new attribute to clang in tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td: def NoFLA : Attr { let Spellings =

> De : 陳韋任 [chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw] > Date d'envoi : mardi 8 mai 2012 11:37 > À : Rinaldini Julien > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Objet : Re: [LLVMdev] RE : svn trunk comilation error > > Hi Rinaldini, > > You probably need to illustrate what your enviroment is, what revision you > checkout and how you build LLVM. I have no problem build LLVM svn here.

Re-adding the list, below message was sent to me alone: On 11 August 2011 13:45, Rinaldini Julien <julien.rinaldini at heig-vd.ch> wrote: > Thx for all answers... > > I'll try that. But in a long term what I want to do will be a bit more complicated... It was just an example. In this case, the goal is to replace all add with sub that return the same result, like: > > var

It try to put all basicblock in a switch in a loop, like that for example: int main() { if(something) somethingelse: else another; } become: int main() { while(true) { switch(var) { case 0: if(something) var+=1; else: var+=2; break; case1:

Hi, I'm having some problem with llvm-mc on a program after applying a pass: ../../../build/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -emit-llvm -c -I./testprof/ -I./src/headers/ -I../libtommath-0.42.0/ -Wall -Wsign-compare -W -Wshadow -Wno-unused-parameter -DLTC_SOURCE -O0 -DLTC_NO_ASM -DUSE_LTM -DLTM_DESC -o src/pk/asn1/der/sequence/der_encode_sequence_ex.bc

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 11/5/19 8:26 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: >> can you provide more detail? >> >> RHEL7 has libtomcrypt but no devel rpm for it. >> That's the onoy issue I had with it. > > tomcrypt.h is required for build this package. Yes, that's the reason I've rebuilt libtomcrypt from the RHEL sources (see

Something is adding a bogus comment string. Specifically " # %case^M18 ", where "^M" is a single ctrl-M character. The ^M is seen by the asm parser as an end-of-line, so the '18' is a new token at the start of a line, not part of the comment. Is your pass perhaps using label names which might include literal "^M" characters? -Jim On Jun 13, 2012, at

Hi ! I'm trying to modify the code in a machine function pass… I added a new basicblock and I want to add a jump to an another BB from my new BB. Here is my code : bool Obfuscation::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { MachineBasicBlock *newEntry = MF.CreateMachineBasicBlock(); MF.insert(MF.begin(), newEntry); std::vector<MachineBasicBlock*> origBB;

Hi! I'm trying to merge 2 basicblocks. I look in BasicBlockUtils.h but the merge function does not what I want. I'm trying to merge basicblock from a switch where the 'case' have no break, from that: int a; switch(c) { case 3: a=1; case 2; b=1; case 1: c=1; } to that: int a; switch(c) { case 3: a=1; b=1; c=1;

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:13:35AM -0700, Mehdi Amini wrote: > > > On Sep 28, 2016, at 11:00 AM, Rinaldini Julien via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I’m using llvm+clang (+ a wrapper for swift that allow me to use my clang to compile swift files) inside Xcode and I have encountered two issues with the new clang 3.9 and

Hi Julien, > On Oct 28, 2014, at 2:14 AM, Rinaldini Julien <julien.rinaldini at heig-vd.ch> wrote: > > Hum, in fact, I'm still a bit lost ;) > > It seems to works in -O0, but in -O1, -O2 and -O3, I got this error (+ the dump of the function): > > # Machine code for function foo: Post SSA > Function Live Ins: %RDI in %vreg7 > > BB#0: derived from LLVM BB