similar to: [LLVMdev] problem on clang+gold

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com>wrote: > > export PATH="$LLVMPREFIX/bin:$LLVMGCCPREFIX/bin:$PATH" > > export CC="llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin -Wl,-plugin-opt=also-emit-llvm" > > export CXX="llvm-g++ -use-gold-plugin -Wl,-plugin-opt=also-emit-llvm" > > export RANLIB=/bin/true > > export

On 7/20/2010 1:25 AM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Guoliang Jin<jingl1345 at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to get the whole program bitcode with debug information in it. >> >> I tried to use CFLAGS = "-O4 -g", but it ends with the following error: >> collect2: ld terminated with signal 6 [Aborted]

> export PATH="$LLVMPREFIX/bin:$LLVMGCCPREFIX/bin:$PATH" > export CC="llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin -Wl,-plugin-opt=also-emit-llvm" > export CXX="llvm-g++ -use-gold-plugin -Wl,-plugin-opt=also-emit-llvm" > export RANLIB=/bin/true > export CFLAGS="-O4 -g" > > then configure, make, and then hit the error. > > The error only happens if

> All the .o files are in the tarball. You can download it here (too large to > send through the list): > http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~aliang/goldAndDebugTest.tar.gz There is also something strange with these files, buf.o is actually a .tar.gz file :-) > > Thanks, > Guoliang > Cheers, -- Rafael Ávila de Espíndola

On 7/21/2010 1:59 PM, Rafael Espindola wrote: >> I do not know how to get the ld invocation you need. If this command is not >> what you need, please tell me how to get the ld invocation. > Add -Wl,-debug to the llvm-gcc call. That should print the ld command > line in the end.

One of our users seems to have strange problems with his mailbox: Oct 2 00:36:42 postamt dovecot: IMAP(rbxxxx): Corrupted transaction log file /home/r/b/rbxxxx/Maildir/.listen.CCL/dovecot.index.log: Append with UID 1096, but next_uid = 1097 Oct 2 00:36:42 postamt dovecot: IMAP(rbxxxx): Corrupted transaction log file /home/r/b/rbxxxx/Maildir/.listen.CCL/dovecot.index.log: Append with UID 1096,

Hey, R users I am using?numerical method for my research paper and the computation burden is very heavy. first I tried to do it with loops, example code as following, and it take hours to converge for only 200 obs. and my real data has 4000 obs. and the optimization command that I use is: optim(guess,myfunc1,data=mydata, method="BFGS",hessian=T)) then I tried matrix

Hi, I would like to get the whole program bitcode with debug information in it. I tried to use CFLAGS = "-O4 -g", but it ends with the following error: collect2: ld terminated with signal 6 [Aborted] Unknown constant! UNREACHABLE executed at /local.toadette/aliang/fixing/llvm-2.7/llvm-2.7/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp:895! What is the right way to get a whole program bitcode

Hey, R users I do not know how to describe my question. I am a new user for R and write the following?code for a dynamic labor economics?model and use OPTIM to get optimizations and parameter values. the following code does not work due to the?equation: ?? wden[,i]<-dnorm((1-regw[,i])/w[5])/w[5] where w[5]?is one of the parameters (together with vector a, b and other elements in vector

Dear R Users on a self-written function for calculating maximum likelihood probability (plz check function code at the bottom of this message), one value, wden, suddenly jump to zero. detail info as following: w[11]=2.14 lnw =2.37 2.90 3.76 ... regw =1.96 1.77 1.82 .... wden=0.182 0.178 0.179... w[11]=2.14 lnw=2.37 2.90 3.76 ... regw =1.96 1.77 1.82 .... wden=0.182

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Guoliang Jin <jingl1345 at gmail.com> wrote: >  Hi, > > I would like to get the whole program bitcode with debug information in it. > > I tried to use CFLAGS = "-O4 -g", but it ends with the following error: > collect2: ld terminated with signal 6 [Aborted] > Unknown constant! > UNREACHABLE executed at >

I think the following may provide a clearer explanation: subs <- c(1,3) DFA <- data.frame(id = 1:3) ar <- array(1:12, c(3,2,2)) ## yielding > ar , , 1 [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 2 5 [3,] 3 6 , , 2 [,1] [,2] [1,] 7 10 [2,] 8 11 [3,] 9 12 ## array subscripting gives > ar[subs,,] , , 1 [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 3 6 , , 2

I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I updated the patch. It should be ok now. Ivan On 27/06/2012 21:42, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > Committed in r159281. > > -Anshu > > > On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: >> Hi Anshu, >> >> I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just >> checked it.

So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported somewhere else? Thanks! Georg? ? ? Gesendet:?Dienstag, 09. Mai 2023 um 19:28 Uhr Von:?"Bert Gunter" <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> An:?"Georg Kindermann" <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at> Cc:?"Rui Barradas" <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt>, r-help at r-project.org Betreff:?Re: [R] data.frame

I really don't know. I would call it a request for extended capabilities of [.data.frame, rather than a feature or bug. But maybe wiser heads than mine who monitor this list can sort it out. -- Bert On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 8:52?PM Georg Kindermann <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at> wrote: > So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported > somewhere else? >

Hi Anshu, Just in case you have forgotten this thread ;-). Is this patch ok to commit or does it not apply to trunk properly ? I can fix it if that's the problem. Ivan On 20/06/2012 19:33, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > > > Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass > and I fixed the violation of column numbers. > > Great. Looks good to me. > >

Hi Anshu, Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass and I fixed the violation of column numbers. On 15/06/2012 21:31, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > The patch looks good to me. I have a couple of minor comments: > > +void State::AddInsnClass(unsigned InsnClass, > Add a top level comment describing the function > > + std::map<State*,

> Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass and I fixed the violation of column numbers. Great. Looks good to me. > IMO, it wil be nice to keep it alive for performance comparisons. Given the overall performance > is rather determined by transition searches on the current state, for small DFA tables may not be a win > and it may still be the case for

Dear list members, when I create a data.frame containing an array I had expected, that I get a similar result, when subsetting it, like having a matrix in a data.frame. But instead I get only the first element and not all values of the remaining dimensions. Differences are already when creating the data.frame, where I can use `I` in case of a matrix but for an array I am only able to insert it in

Committed in r159281. -Anshu On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: > Hi Anshu, > > I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just > checked it. Could you please commit it? > > Ivan > > On 26/06/2012 04:44, adasgupt at codeaurora.org wrote: >> Hi Ivan, >> >> Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The