similar to: [LLVMdev] CLang issue: Weird crashes in _Unwind_resume?

Hello I use mod-itk on several servers on CentOS 6 or CentOS 5 I have a new server with CentOS 7 and I would like to use itk. Installing it works fine using yum but it cannot be started, giving a lot of errors. Does anyone knows how to make it work? S.

Logged this: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13353 I might respectfully suggest that building ITK (like building Boost) is an excellent torture test for CLANG. Up until last week the SVN head worked fine, now it doesn't. Later today I'll try building ITK again with CLang SVN head and see if someone fixed this...

Hi Kent, maybe it could be added to LLVM's nightly testsuite? Ciao, Duncan. On 17/07/12 17:57, Kent Williams wrote: > Logged this: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13353 > > I might respectfully suggest that building ITK (like building Boost) > is an excellent torture test for CLANG. Up until last week the SVN > head worked fine, now it doesn't. Later today I'll

Il 2022-09-23 19:06 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: > Hi all, > the EPEL repository for CentOS7 contains httpd-itk, an apache module > for running different vhosts under specific user/group ID. > > For RHEL8 I can find it only in 3rd party repos, while I misses it > entirely for RHEL9. > > Is the module deprecated? Can it be re-included into EPEL? > Regards. Hi all, anyone

Hello, I trying to run XEN 2.0 (2.4.27, 2.4.28, 2.6.9) on gentoo 2004.3. When i boot guest domain i get this: anubis xen # xm create -f ttylinux -c Using config file "ttylinux". Started domain ttylinux, console on port 9601 ************ REMOTE CONSOLE: CTRL-] TO QUIT ******** Linux version 2.4.28-xenU (root@anubis) (gcc version 3.3.3 20040217 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.3, propolice-3.3-7))

On Dec 10, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> ... If you force a "cleanup" by changing the selector call to: >>> %eh_select8.i = tail call i32 (i8*, i8*, ...)* >>> @llvm.eh.selector.i32( i8* %eh_ptr.i, i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* >>> @__gxx_personality_v0 to i8*), i32 0) >>> then it doesn't work either: the unwinder observes that

I've been trying to get the mod_itk module installed on Centos 7. The package is in epel, but there's an error once it's installed "mod_access_compat.so undefined symbol ap_hook_check_access". Can anyone point me to a set of RPMs that will let me run itk or another C7 ready tool that will easily run each vhost as a different user? -- -- Steve

Hi all, the EPEL repository for CentOS7 contains httpd-itk, an apache module for running different vhosts under specific user/group ID. For RHEL8 I can find it only in 3rd party repos, while I misses it entirely for RHEL9. Is the module deprecated? Can it be re-included into EPEL? Regards. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info

Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> writes: [snip] > Others have suggested alternative build systems before like cmake. > Apparently cmake can autogenerate VC++ and Xcode project files from > the same thing that it builds from on unix systems. cmake creating VC++ project files does not appeal much to me. First, project files are not mandatory for using MS compiler. Second,

Hi Dale, > No, I don't want to change the semantics of invoke, at least I don't > think so. > When inlining, I want the inlined throw to reach cleanup code as it > does. > But I want the Unwind_Resume call that ends the cleanup code to be > replaced with a control transfer to the handler (or cleanup) in the > calling > function, i.e. the inliner needs to know

On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Dale, > >> #include <cstdio> >> class A { >> public: >> A() {} >> ~A() {} >> }; >> void f() { >> A a; >> throw 5.0; >> } >> main() { >> try { >> f(); >> } catch(...) { printf("caught\n"); } >> } > > this example

(Mail system seems to have eaten this, sorry if it's a repeat) On Dec 8, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Dale, > >> - Why was C++ claiming that every selector has a catch-all handler? > > this is easy: because the semantics of invoke require it. Yes, > really. > If unwinding reaches an invoke then control is required to jump to the > unwind basic

http://cornwarning.com/xfer/test.cxx.gz This is a preprocessed version of a file from from the VV image viewer package. I stripped out all the lines beginning in '#' and multiple empty lines. It's about 75k lines of code. On a Mac Pro, the unix 'time' command says it's using 249 seconds of user time. Wall time on my machine somewhere around 5 minutes? 249.035u 1.883s

On 30.12.2011, at 22:12, kent williams wrote: > http://cornwarning.com/xfer/test.cxx.gz > > This is a preprocessed version of a file from from the VV image viewer > package. I stripped out all the lines beginning in '#' and multiple > empty lines. > > It's about 75k lines of code. > > On a Mac Pro, the unix 'time' command says it's using 249

Hi Chris, > ... Claiming that a function has a > > catch-all handler when it does > > not causes the unwinder to go into a loop. this is the bit I don't understand. Why does it go into a loop? How can the unwinder possibly know that the original code did not have a catch-all, since we tell it which catches there are and we say: there is a catch-all! > > -

What is showing in the apache error log? ------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Thursday, May 07, 2015 04:28:16 PM -0400 > From: John <tuxfed at gmail.com> > > Directories permissions: 755 Files permissions: 644 > > On 15-05-07 04:21 PM, John wrote: >> I forgot to mention it. All the files under /var/html are owned >> by apache:apache >>

I've got this on the backup DC root at bdc:~# wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 3000000 while root at bdc:~# ldbedit -H /usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb objectsid=S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 shows correct xid 3000019 and on the primary DC I've got itk at dc:/$ wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 3000019

Hi Dale, > > this is the bit I don't understand. Why does it go > > into a loop? How can the unwinder possibly know that > > the original code did not have a catch-all, since we > > tell it which catches there are and we say: there is > > a catch-all! > > The unwinder works by doing a stack crawl to find a handler. Since > we're telling it

On Dec 8, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Chris, > >> ... Claiming that a function has a >>> catch-all handler when it does >>> not causes the unwinder to go into a loop. > > this is the bit I don't understand. Why does it go > into a loop? How can the unwinder possibly know that > the original code did not have a catch-all, since we

Greetings! Short version: -------------- I cannot rename or delete the directories that have been used in the past (i.e. files or subdirectories created within). Everything else is fine, renamable, deletable. All files (regardless wethder created before or after), all directories created after the first one. I was not able to find any hint on that - neither Google, nor UseNet archive(via