similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.1 Release schedule delay?

> By the way, we are looking for ARM testers. There was a lot of interest in the 3.0 release for an ARM release. We will try to do one this release on a trial basis. We are looking for ARMv7 cortex-a8 and cortex-a9 on Linux. We have two pandard board (ARMv7 cortex-a9) and perhaps one ARMv6 4-cores board. Do we do a native compile or cross compile for the ARM platform? Regards, chenwj --

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:13 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi all, > > Since the 3.1 testing day is coming and be a ARM tester, I would like to > make > sure everything is O.K. so that we don't waste the precious time. As > discussed > on the ML before, I plan to cross compile LLVM/Clang first, then run > regression > test and test suite on

> Ubuntu on ARM is softfp, right? How about testing hardfp with a > distribution like ArchLinuxArm? Yes, Ubuntu on ARM is softfp. But I already told Bill the platform I prepare to test and the testing day begins *tomorrow*, I prefer what it likes now. BTW, what if I use a cross compiler with hardfp enabled to compile LLVM first, then run it on Ubuntu/ARM? Does it achieve your goal, too?

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:02:58AM +0200, Albert Graef wrote: > On 05/08/2012 08:05 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > > The 3.1 release is scheduled for next Monday. Please check the ReleaseNotes.html file to make sure that it's up-to-date. > > Are there any tarballs for the current release candidate available > somewhere, so that I can test my stuff against the new release?

Hi, Sorry I did not precise that, but I'm already doing that... I have, as you say, two different director, one for source and one for build (where I run my configure)... Cheers ________________________________________ De : 陳韋任 [chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw] Date d'envoi : mardi 8 mai 2012 05:21 À : Rinaldini Julien Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Objet : Re: [LLVMdev] svn trunk

Hi Bill, The preliminary result of regression test on ARM shows quit a lot failures, which makes me nervous. After discussion on IRC, echristo and chandlerc sugguested the following possibilities, 1) some flag weirdness 2) miscompile via cross toolchain 3) architecture-specific fundamental bug chandlerc told me compile LLVM/Clang without "-fno-strict-aliasing" first, see if

Hi all, Since the 3.1 testing day is coming and be a ARM tester, I would like to make sure everything is O.K. so that we don't waste the precious time. As discussed on the ML before, I plan to cross compile LLVM/Clang first, then run regression test and test suite on the pandaboards. Could someone help me check to see if I miss something? Thanks! Here is the pandaboard configuration,

On Sep 12, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> /nfs_home/chenwj/llvm-3.1/svn/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Frontend/InitHeaderSearch.cpp:197:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2103 > > I think that this is a GCC ICE. Yes, very definitely. Jim > > --Sean Silva > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:53 PM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) >

thank yang,thank Wei-Ren! i feel i am a question boy,because i has another question now. i want to check if a program output right result,which example in llvm/test/* can give me some idea? suppose i have a helloworld program if it run well,it can give me a result "helloworld",so i want to check if the result is "helloworld". best wishes! changcheng On Tue, Aug 28, 2012

Hi Justin, Is there any progress on new CUDA by llvm PTX? Cheers, Dan On 11 January 2013 07:57, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw>wrote: > Hi Justin, > > I believe the PTX section in the link below need some love, > updating "lib/Target/PTX" to "lib/Target/NVPTX" for example. > Would you like to take a look? > >

Removed from trunk. Pawel can decide if its necessary to update the tarballs. Thanks for the report! Apparently git-svn does not delete removed directories. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:36 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) < chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Pawel, > > PTX already be replaced with NVPTX. However, PTX subdirectory > still sit in lib/Target in 3.2 release. Do you

Right, I forgot to update that originally. I also have a separate document in the works that goes into more detail for NVPTX. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:57 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) < chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > I believe the PTX section in the link below need some love, > updating "lib/Target/PTX" to "lib/Target/NVPTX" for example.

I suggest u grep how this file is used. Since it is included in xxInstrInfo.td and this is its only use, we can conclude that this file does nothng more than defining some helper tablegen classes and we thus can totally move these definitions into xxInstrInfo.td and then remove XXInstFormat.td Regards. 在 2013-2-6 下午4:52，"陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)" <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw>写道： >

> Do you think it's O.K. to put the link somewhere else on the web site? I have been considering adding a page of assorted links to external documentation. I'm not sure if anybody else wants such a page though. -- Sean Silva On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:24:39PM

On 1/11/2013 7:15 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > Removed from trunk. Pawel can decide if its necessary to update the > tarballs. > > Thanks for the report! Apparently git-svn does not delete removed > directories. PTX directories still exists in release_32 branch and RELEASE_32/final. But they are all empty so PTX can not be build. > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:36

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:43 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw > wrote: > > > If we do end up creating ARM binaries for the general public, your > input > > > and expertise will be greatly appreciated! ;) > > I will be happy to provide some Debian & Ubuntu ARM packages. I just > > need access to ARM server(s). > > I don't

Could you tell me the current status of MIPS JIT? On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:38 PM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > Thanks for your information. > > Could you suggest any other framework that I could use for making a > custom JIT > > for ARM? > > I am doing research on JIT compilation for a heterogeneous processor > system. > > If not for

> De : 陳韋任 [chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw] > Date d'envoi : mardi 8 mai 2012 11:37 > À : Rinaldini Julien > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Objet : Re: [LLVMdev] RE : svn trunk comilation error > > Hi Rinaldini, > > You probably need to illustrate what your enviroment is, what revision you > checkout and how you build LLVM. I have no problem build LLVM svn here.

Thank you, Chen! The thing is that I know the Makefile to complete that task. But what I want to know the clang command that can do that. Since the makefile will generate a .ko file while I can use the clang command "-O3-emit-llvm" to generate a corresponding .bc file so the pass can be run on that. Any help? -- 祝好！ 甄凯

> De : 陳韋任 [chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw] > Date d'envoi : mardi 8 mai 2012 11:37 > À : Rinaldini Julien > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Objet : Re: [LLVMdev] RE : svn trunk comilation error > > Hi Rinaldini, > > You probably need to illustrate what your enviroment is, what revision you > checkout and how you build LLVM. I have no problem build LLVM svn here.