similar to: [LLVMdev] test all ones/zeros in vector

Roland Scheidegger <sroland <at> vmware.com> writes: > This looks quite similar to something I filed a bug on (12312). Michael > Liao submitted fixes for this, so I think > if you change it to > %16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr > %17 = sext <4 x i1> %16 to <4 x i32> > %18 = bitcast <4 x i32> %17 to i128 > %19 = icmp ne i128 %18, 0

Am 05.09.2012 00:24, schrieb Stephen: > Roland Scheidegger <sroland <at> vmware.com> writes: >> This looks quite similar to something I filed a bug on (12312). Michael >> Liao submitted fixes for this, so I think >> if you change it to >> %16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr >> %17 = sext <4 x i1> %16 to <4 x i32> >> %18 =

Am 04.09.2012 00:08, schrieb Stephen: >>> which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would > use >>> for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? >> >> I don't think you are missing anything: LLVM IR has no support for horizontal >> operations like or'ing the elements of a vector of boolean together.

I'm straddling the half-way point between samba and ldap. When adding a machine to the domain, functionally, it works like you would expect. You enter in the domain, enter your credentials, and reboot. The computer is able to function as a machine on the domain. I'm using the smbldap-tools as suggested in the wiki. Here's the script: add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd

Hello - I am making a first attempt at writing a simple C++ routine to print out R objects (this is a simple proof-of-concept as part of a larger package development). The relevant C++ routine is as follows: void Rwrite(SEXP fd, SEXP msg) { int *ofd = INTEGER(fd); const char * omsg = CHAR(asChar(msg)); printf("[%i] %s",*ofd,omsg); } And the corresponding interface in R is as

When I run this command I am not prompted for a password, I just get the below error. # smbclient -U root //zmail/homes Error connecting to 10.0.0.14 (Connection refused) Connection to zmail failed (Error NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED) --- Now for the back story: CentOS v5.2 with Samba v3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 and Zimbra 5.0.11_GA on x86_64 hardware. I'm attempting to connect samba (PDC) with

> -----Original Message----- > From: win32utils-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org > [mailto:win32utils-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > Bill Atkins > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:39 AM > To: win32utils-devel@rubyforge.org > Subject: [Win32utils-devel] win32-process + ruby-breakpoint = > strangebehavior > > > I''m getting really strange

> > which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would use > > for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? > > I don't think you are missing anything: LLVM IR has no support for horizontal > operations like or'ing the elements of a vector of boolean together. The code > generators do try to recognize a few idioms and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3666 Bug ID: 3666 Summary: sshd crash Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter:

Hello, (Apologies for length, wanted to get all the relevant detail in that I know of). I've been having a lot of trouble with some code for an inventory analysis problem I was doing, and finally came to the conclusion that it appears that choose() is returning incorrect values. Specifically: ------------- Browse[1]> nn [1] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

We have quite a lot of code in AutoUpgrade.cpp to upgrade X86 intrinsics that have been replaced with native IR over the years. Has enough time and/or versions passed that we can begin phasing out some of this code? As I'm writing these we don't seem to have tests for a lot of the older upgrades. We've done better at this in the last few years. 3.1 added upgrade for:

Hi Eric, I'm using gcc. My make command is make -j9 as mentioned earlier, the -cc1 switch did the trick for me. Thanks for helping out. -- Roland ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Christopher" <echristo at apple.com> > To: "Roland Leißa" <leissa at cs.uni-saarland.de> > Cc: LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Freitag, 13. April 2012 14:39:53

Yes, SVE can vectorize early exit loops by using speculative (first-faulting) loads, which essentially give a predicate of the lanes loaded successfully. For uncounted loops with these special loads, the loop predicate tests can be done using a 'ptest' instruction, checking if the last element is active. Amara On 3 February 2017 at 10:15, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk>

Hi, I am having Mysql connection problem for my first AddressBook application (which I took it from http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-rubyrails/) I have gem installed the latest ruby, rails, lighttpd, fastcgi, mysql-4.1.14 on linux. Everything looks good. When I do: mysql -h localhost -u test -ptest -D AddressBook mysql> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM contacts; +----------+ |

Hi all, I currently have a problem setting up gdb with clang/llvm. I configured llvm/clang (trunk) with: ../llvm/configure --prefix=PROJECT_DIR/install_debug --enable-expensive-checks --enable-targets=host --enable-debug-runtime --enable-shared Now, when I invoke gdb with the freshly built clang it basically works. I can look at backtraces, set breakpoints and so on but breakpoints are never

Is there a reason why? IE is it hard to maintain, slow, or are you just worried it will break? or something else? (I'm not opposed in any way, literally just want to understand the motivation) On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Craig Topper via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > We have quite a lot of code in AutoUpgrade.cpp to upgrade X86 intrinsics > that have

Yes unfortunately I do not have much luck recieving help from the SAMBA mailing list. After much playing I found something weird that was seemingly causing incorrect comments. Most printers would recieve the comment - "no entries" which originally I assumed to be the default comment given by Win95 when it could not get a proper comment. However I later found that this is not the case.

On Apr 13, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Roland Leißa <leissa at cs.uni-saarland.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I currently have a problem setting up gdb with clang/llvm. > > I configured llvm/clang (trunk) with: > ../llvm/configure --prefix=PROJECT_DIR/install_debug --enable-expensive-checks --enable-targets=host --enable-debug-runtime --enable-shared > > Now, when I invoke gdb

On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Roland Leißa <leissa at cs.uni-saarland.de> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I'm using gcc. My make command is > make -j9 > > as mentioned earlier, the -cc1 switch did the trick for me. Thanks for helping out. Aha. Yes, that'd do it. Glad you're up and debugging. -eric

On Apr 23, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Roland Leißa <leissa at cs.uni-saarland.de> wrote: > As you can see the line is question is executed but the breakpoint is not triggered. Apparently, clang executes the code generation in a different process. What do I have to do in order to debug this process? What you did before, run it under -cc1. The best way is to use -v to get the full -cc1 line and