similar to: [LLVMdev] Calling C-language variadic functions

Gregory Junker <gjunker at dayark.com> writes: > Such as printf, etc., from IR created using the API (IRBuilder). > > Google hasn't provided much help, and I can't find anything relevant in > the docs (the docs talk about how to do varargs in LLVM ASM, but not how > to call an external vararg function that exists in a library that gets > linked to the LLVM

> -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Lewycky [mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca] > Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 2:36 PM > To: Gregory Junker > Cc: 'Rotem, Nadav'; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] "Cannot select" error in 2.9 > > Gregory Junker wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Rotem, Nadav

Gregory Junker wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Rotem, Nadav [mailto:nadav.rotem at intel.com] >>> Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 6:51 AM >>> To: Gregory Junker >>> Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] "Cannot select" error in 2.9 >>> >>> Can you reduce the test with bug-point ? Does it work on ToT ? >> >> Hi

I am looking through the source and Support/ErrorHandling.cpp/.h says, in so many words, "don't throw exceptions from inside an installed fatal error handling routine". So how are people handling errors during JIT? For command-line compilers, calling exit() or abort() isn't as big a deal -- the compiler is probably going to exit anyway. But say, for instance, the host

Are you saying this is this the first time you've tried to compile it on the cluster? It's easy to determine if g++ is installed and in the PATH - just get a console on the cluster and type "g++". However, AFAIK cluster nodes are not usually configured for software development, are they? Typically you build your code locally and then job it out to the cluster? Greg

I've compiled llvm several times, but this is the first time I saw this error when I was trying to compile it in a cluster. checking tool compatibility... configure: error: g++|clang++|icc required but not found I am pretty sure g++ is installed and in the path. I then downloaded clang++ binary and set path. The error was still there. OS: opensuse 10.1 gcc, g++ version: 4.2.3 Any idea? Bo

On 30 July 2011 23:39, Gregory Junker <gjunker at dayark.com> wrote: >> From: Nick Lewycky [mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca] [snip] >> Gregory Junker wrote: >> > That doesn't make a lot of sense to me -- LLVM can't add doubles? >> >> No, LLVM can't, but it can fadd them. ;) "add" only accepts integers >> and >> vectors of integers,

Say I get an ADIT 600 with two FXS8A and one FXO8A from ebay. a. Is it good for Asterisk? b. How do I connect the extensions and lines to it? Do I need a special jack? Can I get that jack in every corner? c. where can I find help for configuring it? d. what kind of backup does it have? Does it need to be reconfigured after a power outage? Shoval Tomer, IT Manager, SofTov Advanced Systems, Ltd.

I am trying to do my first asterisk install on a SuSE 9.1 box, using the asterisk-update script mentioned a few days ago on this list. I did read the 'quickstart' document on onlamp.com, and made sure the following packages were installed via yast: bison, cvs, gcc, kernel-source, libtermcap-devel, ncurses-devel, newt-devel, openssl096b, and openssl-devel. The SuSE 9.1 DVD contained

I am trying to run a program called content composer and the text in the text field is invisible until i highlight it or sometimes just clicking around it will make it pop up for a bit. Also the words aren't wrapping correctly. Here are the errors i get when i run it command line. Code: fixme:mpr:WNetGetConnectionW Don't know how to convert L"\\junker" to an unc

http://www.voip-info.org gives: Warning: mysql error: No Database Selected in query: select `name` ,`value` from `tiki_preferences` in /var/www/html/tikiwiki-1.8.2/lib/tikidblib.php on line 133 Values: Array ( ) $result is false $result is empty Was going to grab a link to give to Florent regarding his CTI thread and question about how to program against the Asterisk API...

I followed what you said and called verifyModule() with the AbortProcessAction option. verifyModule() returns false, but does not abort and does not print out any information about what caused the verification to fail. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: >> I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds >> information from a

Hello everyone: I have a little question about the second argument *action* of verifyFunction. In docs: *Enumerator: * *AbortProcessAction* verifyModule will print to stderr and abort() *PrintMessageAction* verifyModule will print to stderr and return true *ReturnStatusAction* verifyModule will just return true But it still abort when I pass

I also tried iterating through the functions of the module and calling verifyFunction(), which also returns false, but does not cause an abort or report anything to stderr about what caused the verification to fail. From the doxygen for verifyFunction() and verifyModule(), it seems like they both should print information to stderr if the verification fails and should abort opt if

I simply cannot get X-Lite (Windows) or SJ (Linux) softphones (the only ones I have tried) to register with Asterisk on the LAN (no NAT, no routers). I have looked at every conceivable archived message regarding 401 Unauthorized, SJPhone, etc., and have looked at every relevant article in the Wiki (and then some), and it looks to me like everything should be fine....yet I cannot get these phones

> -----Original Message----- > From: Rotem, Nadav [mailto:nadav.rotem at intel.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 6:51 AM > To: Gregory Junker > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] "Cannot select" error in 2.9 > > Can you reduce the test with bug-point ? Does it work on ToT ? Hi Nadav I'm not sure what those are -- can you clarify? Thanks Greg

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017, at 07:34 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 3:10 AM SANJAY SRIVALLABH SINGAPURAM via llvm-dev > < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > One of my Julia programs failed to execute with the following error, > > DICompileUnit not listed in llvm.dbg.cu > > !11 = distinct

I think I misread the doxygen. verifyFunction & verifyModule return false if no errors are detected. However, my question now becomes why does the code produced by my transform pass verification, but it causes an assertion failure in the byte reader when it (the code produced by my transform) is passed to another invocation of opt? Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I also tried iterating

Hi Xiu, The Verifier pass runs a PreVerifier pass, which does not honour the action argument, and will always abort on a broken module, (Line 106, lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp) Perhaps you should file a bug against this, to allow you to not abort if you so wish. Joey On 11 June 2012 09:41, Guowei Xu <myesis at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone: > > I have a little question

Gregory Junker wrote: > >> Actually, it was new in *2.6*, which was released almost two years >> ago. It's documented here: >> <http://llvm.org/releases/2.6/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#coreimprovements>. > > Interesting -- then I guess my question is why 2.8 (which is the first version of LLVM I've used) didn't flag this? > > Either way, it makes sense