similar to: [LLVMdev] StructTypes into one

Hi Михаил, > Is it possible to merge StructTypes with different names like: > > %"class.std::allocator.4" = type { i8 } > %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator.5" = type { i8 } > %"class.std::allocator.0" = type { i8 } > %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator.1" = type { i8 } > %"class.std::allocator.0.6" = type { i8 } > > merge

I have such problem with linking represented files.... llvm-link 1.bc 2.bc -o 3.bc 2012/5/4 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Михаил, > > > Is it possible to merge StructTypes with different names like: > > > > %"class.std::allocator.4" = type { i8 } > > %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator.5" = type { i8 } > >

It is ModulePass with AnalysisUsage of CallGraph Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail 22.04.2012, в 5:20, Nick Lewycky написал(а): > Михаил wrote: >> Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still get bug in >> eraseFromParent(): >> >> While deleting: i32 (%class.B*, i32)* %_ZN1B1xEi >> An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! >>

Михаил wrote: > It is ModulePass with AnalysisUsage of CallGraph Ah, then you'll need to update the CallGraph first. Use "CG.removeFunctionFromModule(F);" before deleting it. Nick > Yours sincerely, > Kadysev Mikhail > > 22.04.2012, в 5:20, Nick Lewycky написал(а): > >> Михаил wrote: >>> Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still

Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still get bug in eraseFromParent(): While deleting: i32 (%class.B*, i32)* %_ZN1B1xEi An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! UNREACHABLE executed at /Users/neonomaly/LLVM/LLVM/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp:561! Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail 21.04.2012, в 23:45, Nick Lewycky написал(а): > Михаил wrote: >> How correctly

Михаил wrote: > Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still get bug in > eraseFromParent(): > > While deleting: i32 (%class.B*, i32)* %_ZN1B1xEi > An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! > UNREACHABLE executed at /Users/neonomaly/LLVM/LLVM/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp:561! The replaceAllUsesWith + eraseFromParent pattern remains correct, but there's

How correctly remove function from module? For example: int f1(int x) { ... a = f2(smth); ... } int f2 (int y) { ... b = f1(smth); ... } I need delete from module both f1 and f2. They haven't uses in other part of module, but I can't delete them with eraseFromParent, because they are use each other. Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part

Hi. I have such task: to get information about classes of work program (module) form Module (LLVM class), for example in ModulePass. I tried to analyze source code of LLVM architecture related with Module class, but I have not founded any useful information. Thanks! Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, though DSA isn't maintained in the current build, I need to use it for analyzing dependencies among functions. Therfore I load the EQTDDataStructures pass and retrieve the mapping from nodes int the callee to the ones in the parent DSGraph with computeNodeMapping. In most cases this works well, but for some function calls I get following error: DSGraph.cpp:1379: static void

Михаил wrote: > How correctly remove function from module? > For example: > > int f1(int x) { > ... > a = f2(smth); > ... > } > int f2 (int y) { > ... > b = f1(smth); > ... > } > > I need delete from module both f1 and f2. They haven't uses in other > part of module, but I can't delete them with eraseFromParent, because > they are use each

It also occurs on several (different) test cases. I have founded that assershion rises in void ValueHandleBase::ValueIsDeleted(Value *V); Code from function: // All callbacks, weak references, and assertingVHs should be dropped by now. if (V->HasValueHandle) { #ifndef NDEBUG // Only in +Asserts mode... dbgs() << "While deleting: " << *V->getType()

Hi, I am not exactly sure what causes your error. But if you have a reduced test case we can try looking at it. Thanks, Arushi Hello, i wrote a little pass. It tries to identify every call- / invoke-instruction recursively and calls computeCalleeCallerMapping for each. The sample program just creates a vector of integer and adds an element to it. Do you know what's wrong? Best,

Hi! I've have Instruction in my code: ... %call6 = call i32 %9(%class.A* %call3, i32 2) ... And I want to get something like this: ... %11 = icmp eq i32 (%class.D*, i32)* %10, @_ZThn4_N1D1xEi br i1 %11, label %12, label %14 ; <label>:12 ; preds = %7 %13 = bitcast %class.A* %call3 to %class.D* %call64 = call i32

Hi. I've tried to search the way to write a pass for clang like a pass for opt, but I haven't find it. Is it possible? I need to save class inheritance of the program being processed to external file. Thanks! Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi. I have a test program: class A { int A; public: virtual void test ( int x ) = 0; }; class B : public A { int B; public: void test ( int x ) {}; }; int main() { A *a = new B(); a->test(1); } We have call site CS: "a->test(1);". CS.getCalledFunction() - return NULL, so we can say that this call site is virtual. My optimization determines, that in this call site

Hi. Can I know that in Module *M Function* F is a method of StructType *st? Also can I know that in this StructType the F has mark "virtual"? Thanks! Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120302/5c77c3ee/attachment.html>

Virtual call translates into IR like this: %0 = bitcast %class.A* %call to i32 (%class.A*, i32)*** %vtable = load i32 (%class.A*, i32)*** %0 %vfn = getelementptr inbounds i32 (%class.A*, i32)** %vtable, i64 0 %1 = load i32 (%class.A*, i32)** %vfn Is it possible to map pair [StructType, methodIndex(i64 0 in example)] into Function? Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next

I've had reports lately about segfaults in the rgl package. I've only been able to reproduce these on Linux. I am not so familiar with C++ details, so I have a couple of questions way down below. But first some background info. One recipe to recreate the crash works with a new version 5.0-1 of the mixOmics package: > library(mixOmics) > example(pca) This crashes with

Hi, Today I've been trying to debug a weird bug that makes JIT crash with certain code and when using the inliner. This may sound weird, but if I disable the inliner, it doesn't crash. I include an example gdb dump below. Does something looks wrong? Do you think it's a bug in JIT or it's just some other piece of code that is writing on the JIT memory?.. I don't really know

Is it possible to use address of function in case block of switch instruction? I understand that it should be constants only, but in llvm reference i founded that: "The addresses of global variables and functions are always implicitly valid (link-time) constants. " Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: