similar to: [LLVMdev] Odd PPC inline asm constraint

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:54 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > There is a comment in the file which reads: > > /* The weird 'i#*X' constraints on the following suppress a gcc > warning when __excepts is not a constant. Otherwise, they mean the > same as just plain 'i'. */ [sinp] > ("mtfsb0 %s0" : : "i#*X"(__builtin_ffs (__excepts))); [snip]

Peter, Could you please comment on: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12757 Specifically, gcc seems to allow this: int __flt_rounds() { unsigned long fpscr; __asm__ volatile("mffs %0" : "=f"(fpscr)); return fpscr; } My reading of this is that gcc allocates a floating-point register to hold the result of the mffs instruction, and then bit casts (and truncates?) the

Peter, Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in clang or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp, is clang relying on that code, or is there some frontend code in clang itself that is failing to initially interpret the string? If it is the code in TargetLowering, then I don't see any support

Hi, Is it possible (and how) to use a variable value to create a name of a new R variable? I want to do something like this: for (i in 1:3) { newvarialbe_#i# = somedata } where #i# is a value stored by i. In the first loop, there will be newvariable_1, in second newvariable_2 and so on. Thanks in advance, Maciek [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I'm using omindex to index files and I want make query with user/group boolean prefix (I*, I at ... and I#...). That work well with "other" and "group" right, but not in all case for "user" right. Here is an example: assume that we have an user "ftp" not in "users" group. If file right are: -rw-r------ 1 ftp users 13 2013-10-06

Hi, i am trying to compile llvm in a 64 Bit PowerPC machine with Yellowdog Linux 6.1 operating system. I could compile llvm but when I was trying to compile the llvm-gcc4.2 front end the compilation aborted with following error message: ../../gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c: In function ‘rs6000_override_options’: ../../gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c:1510: error: ‘MASK_MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC’ undeclared

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:28:34 +0100 Simon Burton <simon at arrowtheory.com> wrote: > > >From what I remember, this is a bug in debian libc: > some floating point flags are set incorrectly causing SIGFPE. > Can't find the bug report ATM. Oh, it just showed up on numpy-discussion: http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 """ #include

On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 00:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:25:29 -0500 > Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > By the strict letter of the 32-bit ABI, the save and restore of > > r31 at a negative offset of r1 is verboten. The ABI states the > > the stack space below the stack pointer is declared as volatile. > > I actually

On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 19:58 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 17:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > By default it should build for > > whatever the current host is (no special flags required). To > > specifically build for something else, use: > > -ccc-host-triple powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu > > or > > -ccc-host-triple

Hello all, in order to connect to my SSH servers from untrusted devices like company computers or my smartphone, I set up 2FA with google-authenticator hooked into PAM. However, this is not really 2FA at least for the smartphone, since I use the same device for generating the TANs and it is also at least inconvenient to always require a new TAN for each connection. I do not want to solely rely

Good day! A few weeks ago, we had a security breach in the company I'm working for, because employees used "ssh -R" to expose systems from our internal network to some SSH server in the outer world. Of course, this is a breach of our internal security policy, but lead us to wonder, whether there is a technical solution to prevent our users from creating SSH-reverse-tunnels. After

On Tue, 01 May 2012 17:23:07 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 16:06 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > LLVM/clang now will build in the normal way (./configure; make > > install) on PPC (you'll need at least the 3.1 release candidate (or > > trunk)). I generally build on my PPC64 hosts with: > > make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Simon Burton wrote: >>> From what I remember, this is a bug in debian libc: >> some floating point flags are set incorrectly causing SIGFPE. >> Can't find the bug report ATM. > > Oh, it just showed up on numpy-discussion: > http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 > > """ > #include <fenv.h> > void

Ok, and then? in file smb.conf.192.168.0.1 [global] ... bind interfase only = yes interfaces = eth0 ... [FOR_ALL] ... in file smb.conf.192.168.0.2 [global] ... bind interfase only = yes interfaces = eth1 ... [ADMINS] ... Does this configuration works? Is this a good solution? i really don't know, so what's the global thinking about this. -- Information Systems

Ok rebooted All running ok now. Great thanks a lot! In system.log Jun 15 21:38:54 c01 com.apple.xpc.launchd[1] (org.networkupstools.upsmon): Unknown key for Boolean: SuccessfulExit Jun 15 21:38:54 c01 com.apple.xpc.launchd[1] (org.networkupstools.upsmon): This service is defined to be constantly running and is inherently inefficient. What is the purpose of Boolean: SuccessfulExit?

On 9/13/17 10:31 AM, Peter Bergner via llvm-dev wrote: > On 9/12/17 8:15 PM, Bill Seurer via llvm-dev wrote: >> I updated one of my powerpc64le llvm test systems to Fedora 25 and I >> started getting a whole bunch of sanitizer test case failures.  I tried >> testing some earlier revisions on the new OS that had worked fine under >> the old but they generate the same

On Apr 4 13:58, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Alexander Wuerstlein > <snalwuer at cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote: > > On 2018-04-04T17:27, mlrx <openssh-unix-dev at 18informatique.com> wrote: > >> Le 04/04/2018 ? 13:32, Jan Bergner a ?crit : > >> > Good day! > >> > > >> > Is it possible to

Duncan, et al., I am interested in getting dragonegg to work on PowerPC. Obviously the stuff in src/x86 needs to be replaced/replicated for PowerPC, but if you have a few minutes, can you provide your thoughts on what has to be changed between x86 and PPC. Thanks in advance, Hal -- Hal Finkel Postdoctoral Appointee Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory

Hi, I compiled rsync on an HPUX 11i box, and got lots of errors about redefining sendfile() and sendpath(). The compilation succeeded, but the binary failed. I then took a binary I had compiled on an HP11.00 box, and it worked fine. I tried this with both gcc & the HP ansic compilers. The same results. I am attaching a full transcript of the configure & compilation session. The ld

Hi! There is a little problem in the security/isakmpd port. There are some gen*.sh scripts in it, which generate some C header (and src) files. These scripts are using awk, tr, etc - some generic UNIX tools. One of the tools has problems with some localisations, so these scripts generate incorrect C-code. Eg, I have Hungarian localisation set, so I have the following in my environ: