similar to: [LLVMdev] PHI Insertion

It sounds like Transforms/Utils/SSAUpdater may be what you are looking for. A good example of how to use it -- one that sounds very similar to what you're doing -- can be found in Transforms/Scalar/LoopRotation.cpp On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am splitting a one BB loop into two BB. > > Basically, the one loop BB has 3 incoming

I am splitting a one BB loop into two BB. Basically, the one loop BB has 3 incoming values, one form back edge two from other edges. I want to extract the PHIs from the other two edges out into it's own BB and delete that from the loop, then redirect the backedge to the loopbody (non extracted portion) and create a new PHI coming from the extracted BB and the backedge. I can do this;

On May 22, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Louis Gerbarg <lgg at apple.com> wrote: > The problem that the above transform is technically illegal because “When indexing into a (optionally packed) structure, only i32 integer constants are allowed (when using a vector of indices they must all be the same

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > To: "Louis Gerbarg" <lgg at apple.com> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 7:09:49 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: Indexing of structs vs arrays in getelementpointer > > > > >

On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:33 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > >> So, there are two primary ideas behind SSA form management in the loop optimizers of LLVM: >> >> - Require LCSSA form input, leverage its (very powerful) guarantees to simplify maintaining SSA

I'm attempting to modify a parser generator to emit LLVM code instead of C. So far the experience has been trivial, but I am now running into an error regarding labels that I can't seem to solve. Situation 1: A label is used immediately after a void function call (l6 in this case): <snip> %tmp26 = load i32* @yybegin, align 4 %tmp27 = load i32* @yyend, align 4 call void

From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox at microsoft.com> The eXtensible Bitmap is a sparse bitmap representation which is efficient for set bits which tend to cluster. It supports up to 'unsigned long' worth of bits. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>

OK, here's a rewrite of xbitmap. Compared to the version you sent: - xb_find_set() is the rewrite I sent out yesterday. - xb_find_clear() is a new implementation. I use the IDR_FREE tag to find clear bits. This led to me finding a bug in radix_tree_for_each_tagged(). - xb_zero() is also a new implementation (replacing xb_clear_bit_range). It should also be more efficient in deep

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:13:16PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > unsigned long bit; > > xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL); > > xb_set_bit(xb, 700); > > xb_preload_end(); > > bit = xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 0); > > assert(bit == 700); > > This above test will result in "!node with bitmap

This patch adds support to find next 1 or 0 bit in a xbmitmap range and clear a range of bits. More possible optimizations to add in the future: 1) xb_set_bit_range: set a range of bits. 2) when searching a bit, if the bit is not found in the slot, move on to the next slot directly. 3) add tags to help searching. Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox

From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox at microsoft.com> Add the following tests for xbitmap: 1) single bit test: single bit set/clear/find; 2) bit range test: set/clear a range of bits and find a 0 or 1 bit in the range. Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox at microsoft.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michael S.

So essentially I'm adding a path inside of the loop. Is there a way to have llvm automatically create new IR and update the PHIs simply by adding a block like this and changing the DomTree? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> Date: Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:08 PM Subject: Updating PHI for Instruction Domination? To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu So

So I have a loop with two blocks, a header (which points to return and latch) and a latch (which points to return and header). I have inserted a few new blocks, called H and F. Header now points to H and latch. Latch now points to F. H points to F. F points to Header and return. The PHI Nodes have been updated in Header accordingly, now coming from the preheader and F (instead of latch). My

On 11/30/2017 06:34 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Wei Wang wrote: >> + * @start: the start of the bit range, inclusive >> + * @end: the end of the bit range, inclusive >> + * >> + * This function is used to clear a bit in the xbitmap. If all the bits of the >> + * bitmap are 0, the bitmap will be freed. >> + */ >> +void xb_clear_bit_range(struct xb *xb,

Not that I'm aware of. -eric On Feb 2, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Ryan Taylor wrote: > So essentially I'm adding a path inside of the loop. Is there a way to have llvm automatically create new IR and update the PHIs simply by adding a block like this and changing the DomTree? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> > Date:

Hi Mikael, You are obtaining warning, not an error, right? The most arm cores, including arm1136, can execute mul with rd = rm. So, you can ignore this warning. Lauro 2007/6/12, Peltier, Mikael <m-peltier at ti.com>: > > > > > Hello, > > > > I want to compile a LLVM file into an executable running on ARM platform. > > I use LLVM 2.0 with the following

This patch adds support to find next 1 or 0 bit in a xbmitmap range and clear a range of bits. More possible optimizations to add in the future: 1) xb_set_bit_range: set a range of bits. 2) when searching a bit, if the bit is not found in the slot, move on to the next slot directly. 3) add tags to help searching. Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox

This patch adds support to find next 1 or 0 bit in a xbmitmap range and clear a range of bits. More possible optimizations to add in the future: 1) xb_set_bit_range: set a range of bits. 2) when searching a bit, if the bit is not found in the slot, move on to the next slot directly. 3) add tags to help searching. Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox

Hello, I want to compile a LLVM file into an executable running on ARM platform. I use LLVM 2.0 with the following command lines: llvm-as -f -o test.bc test.ll llc -march=arm -mcpu=arm1136j-s -mattr=+v6 -f -o test.s test.bc arm-linux-gnu-as -mcpu=arm1136j-s test.s With the last command, I obtain the following error: rd and rm should be different in mul The bad instruction is

On Dec 31, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Preston Briggs wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I wish we could talk about this at a white board, over a period of > weeks, but email will have to do… That would be nice :) > I don't entirely understand your position about dominance frontiers. > In my experience, they were trivial to compute, requiring very little > time, space, or code. Rereading