similar to: [LLVMdev] Bug with debug information generation?

I'm seeing some strange behavior with generating debugging information from a simple program. (LLVM top of tree, minus a couple of days.) I suspect that there is a bug in LLVM, but thought I'd check in here to see if perhaps I'm doing something wrong or misunderstanding something. In short, if I add a single (totally unused) alloca of an <8 x i32> to a function, then the

Hi,   I want to list some additional information on this.   The variable collection I am looking at is, "variables 'declared' in scope".   1. When I traverse the MachineInstructions in the LexicalScopes ranges, and check for variables, I get variables used in this scope.      The variables listed include variables which may not have been declared in the scope. (for example

> On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hey guys, >> >> Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every

> On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com <mailto:aprantl at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com <mailto:aprantl at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan

Hear hear. DW_ adds no readability but AT_/TAG_/OP_/etc do. Dropping the FORM entirely is fine; I view that as a mechanical encoding thing, not relevant to the informational content. If you're debugging the encoding then it would matter, but for a random string-value attribute it really doesn't matter which of the 3 (4?) different forms was used as long as the actual string shows up

I figured out my previous problem with DIBuilder. However, now I can't seem to get the compiler to emit location information for local variables. Here's how my IR looks: --- define i32 @"\01_main"() { init: %exception1 = alloca i8* %0 = alloca i32 %"bar:Int32" = alloca i32 %1 = alloca i32 %2 = alloca i32* br label %code code:

Hey guys, Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every "DW_OP" (heck, we could even skip the "OP" given the context - nothing else textual can appear there, right?) Any thoughts on skipping the "DW_" (maybe even the AT/TAG/FORM too) in the rest of dwarfdump? (skipping the AT/TAG (FORM

I found the problem. The llvm.dbg.declare call must have a !dbg tag, otherwise the location info is not generated. Changing the invocation in my original example to "call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata !{i32* %"bar:Int32"}, metadata !13), !dbg !16" causes MC to generate the local location as expected. -Joe On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Joe Groff <arcata at

Dear colleagues, in the process of upgrading my home router I'm trying to utilise Intel D2500CC mini-ITX motherboard[1]. Both stable/9 and head suffer from no scrolling issue: from the beginning of booting the kernel, all output overrides the last line on the screen, while others keep the loader phase. Provided the board has multiple serial ports and the final target (headless

I agree that a single vector index is sufficient for many cases. Matt Pharr (from the ISPC compiler), showed me an interesting case where there is a single pointer into an array. In this case we need to have two indices, where the first index is zero. Once the basic patch is in, we can start looking at adding support for arrays and multiple indices. Nadav -----Original Message----- From: David

I'm seeing some undesirable behavior where, when generating debugging information, sometimes the point in the debugger will jump forwards and backwards during single stepping, even though the output from our frontend (this is the ispc compiler), is emitting LLVM instructions with a strictly forward-moving/increasing set of source locations. I'm wondering if we're doing something wrong

On Apr 24, 2012, at 5:36 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 24 April 2012 16:04, Matt Pharr <matt.pharr at gmail.com> wrote: >> When I generate debug information for a source file that has a number of static functions that are unused, all of the debugging metadata that I generated for them during initial compilation remains even after the source function definitions have been stripped

I'm seeing some behavior that surprised me in writing an <8 x i1> vector to memory and reading it back. (Specifically, the surprise is that I didn't get the original value back!). This happens both with TOT and 2.9. This program illustrates the issue: define i32 @foo() { %c = alloca <8 x i1> store <8 x i1> <i1 true, i1 false, i1 false, i1 false, i1 false, i1

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Matt Pharr <matt.pharr at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm seeing some behavior that surprised me in writing an <8 x i1> vector to memory and reading it back.  (Specifically, the surprise is that I didn't get the original value back!).  This happens both with TOT and 2.9.  This program illustrates the issue: > > define i32 @foo() { >  %c =

r143524 changed ModuleLinker such that when linking a Module B into a Module A, any internal/private/... functions in B are only linked into A if there is a use of them in A. This is problematic for my usage of module linking, where I'm basically linking a few modules together (some of which include internal functions) and then generating additional code that may use some of the internal

Duncan, Thanks for the quick review! Here is a short description (design) of where I am going with this patch: 1. Motivation: Vectors-of-pointers is the first step in supporting scatter/gather instructions (available in AVX2, for example). I believe that this feature was requested on the mailing list before. As mentioned by Hal Finkel earlier today, this feature is desired by autovectorizers as

When I generate debug information for a source file that has a number of static functions that are unused, all of the debugging metadata that I generated for them during initial compilation remains even after the source function definitions have been stripped out of the IR. (e.g. in the MD for DW_TAG_compile_unit's list of subprograms, each of those functions' info is still in the list,

Today Intel launched ispc, the Intel SPMD Program Compiler, an open-source compiler built on top of LLVM. It is available in both source and binary form from http://ispc.github.com/, under a BSD license. The goal of ispc is to provide a high-performance implementation of a C-based SPMD language for CPUs. The SPMD model has of course been quite successful for high-performance programming of

"Rotem, Nadav" <nadav.rotem at intel.com> writes: > David, > > Thanks for the support! I sent a detailed email with the overall > plan. But just to reiterate, the GEP would look like this: > > %PV = getelementptr <4 x i32*> %base, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4> > > Where the index of the GEP is a vector of indices. I am not

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Matt Pharr <matt.pharr at gmail.com> wrote: > r143524 changed ModuleLinker such that when linking a Module B into a Module A, any internal/private/... functions in B are only linked into A if there is a use of them in A.  This is problematic for my usage of module linking, where I'm basically linking a few modules together (some of which include