similar to: [LLVMdev] [3.1 Release] Release Candidate 1 Sources Available

Hi LLVM-ers! The 3.3 release candidate 1 sources are now available! You can get them here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc1/ Once binaries are available, they will be posted there as well. Please test out these sources and create bug reports for any problems you encounter (http://llvm.org/bugs/) --- and please CC me on those bug reports. Share and enjoy! -bw Note: There are symlinks

Hi all, The testers started testing 3.1rc3. You can find binaries at http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.1/rc3/. Please file bugs and report any issues to me. Thanks! -bw

The ARM binaries seem to be corrupt. Although correctly signed, the xz file seems to be truncated arm7% unxz < clang+llvm-3.5.0-rc3-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz | wc -c unxz: (stdin): Unexpected end of input 133214381 M.E.O. On Aug 21, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Ahem. And now for the correct URL: > >

Hello, 3.2 Release Candidate 1 (3.2rc1) sources for: cfe,compiler-rt, dragonegg, llvm, polly and test-suite are available for download from here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.2/rc1/ RC1 binaries for primary platforms will be available, in the next few days. In the meantime please compile everything you can and report any issues and problems. Umbrella bug for 3.2 release is:

The third 3.5 release candidate is now available. Please pick up sources and binaries here: https://llvm.org/pre-release/3.5 Run it through its phases and report any bugs you find! Share and enjoy! -bw

On May 24, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi! > > The binaries for the 3.3 release candidate 2 are starting to role in. Please take them and give them a go. Please file bug reports for any problems you encounter. > > At this point, we are taking fixes only for *serious* regressions from 3.2. I will be pushing back on all requests to merge

I’m sorry for the late announcement. The binaries for the 3.5 release candidate 2 are now available. Please pick them up here and test them out! http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5/ -bw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140811/c65347b7/attachment.html>

On Aug 14, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 02:13 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> I’m sorry for the late announcement. >> >> The binaries for the 3.5 release candidate 2 are now available. Please >> pick them up here and test them out! >> >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5/ > > Can somebody

Hi! The binaries for the 3.3 release candidate 2 are starting to role in. Please take them and give them a go. Please file bug reports for any problems you encounter. At this point, we are taking fixes only for *serious* regressions from 3.2. I will be pushing back on all requests to merge something into the 3.3 branch. In other words, you will need to do a lot to convince me that we need to go

Source and binaries for LLVM-3.9.0-rc1 are now available at http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.9.0/#rc1 Please try it out, run tests, build your favourite projects, and *file bugs* about anything that doesn't work and needs to be fixed for the release. Please CC me on any findings. Thanks, Hans

On Sep 15, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Albert Graef wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: >> Release testing of Release Candidate 1 is finished. I'll be tagging >> Release Candidate 2 tonight. If there are any fixes you want in, please >> get them approved as soon as possible. > > Are there any tarballs for the release candidates available? Tanya used > to make these available

Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Please test out these sources and create bug reports for any > problems you encounter (http://llvm.org/bugs/) --- and please CC me > on those bug reports. The RC looks good on SystemZ; all projects/test-suite tests pass. There are still two failing tests in the regression suite: LLVM :: DebugInfo/namespace.ll This was already

See http://llvm.org/PR19289 for lots of details. It had already been reported before but I had missed it and so had most others. =[ I'm pretty sure this breaks every 32-bit debian based Linux distro. I've asked David Majnemer to try to confirm or refute that. If it does impact every 32-bit debian based Linux distro, I think this should be a release blocker sad as I am to say it. CC-ing

On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:50:24 -0700 Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > On Sep 15, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Albert Graef wrote: > > > Bill Wendling wrote: > >> Release testing of Release Candidate 1 is finished. I'll be tagging > >> Release Candidate 2 tonight. If there are any fixes you want in, > >> please get them approved as soon as

We had to roll a release candidate 4 for the 3.5 release. It’s up at the normal place: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5 Please test it and report any major bugs you may find. Thanks! -bw

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > On May 24, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> The binaries for the 3.3 release candidate 2 are starting to role in. Please take them and give them a go. Please file bug reports for any problems you encounter. >> >> At this point,

Hello all, Source and binaries for LLVM 3.7.0-rc1 are now available at http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.7.0/ Please try them out, run tests, build your favourite projects, and *file bugs* about anything that doesn't work and needs to be fixed for the release. Please CC me on any findings. Thanks, Hans

Hi Hans, > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 5:24 PM Rainer Orth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Hans, >> >> > It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat >> > unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been >> > tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. >> > >> > Source code

Hi Bill, On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:52:03PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi Wei-Ren Chen, > > Thanks for the reports. Could you ask on the cfe-dev list if adding these flags to the tests are appropriate to fix the issues? > > -bw If I send patch for LLVM 3.1 rc1, what revision I should againt? The one (r154899) which rc1 branch from, or the current svn head? Regards, chenwj

Hi all! The 3.1 release is scheduled for next Monday. Please check the ReleaseNotes.html file to make sure that it's up-to-date. Thanks! -bw