similar to: [LLVMdev] Incorrect result in LLVM Alias Analysis

Hi Adarsh, > I want to check if the values a and b in the program alias. > > int main() { > int *a,*b; > a=(int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); > b=(int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); > *a=10; > *b=8; > return 0; > } > > I use the below code for this (getAnalysisUsage method has been defined) > > AliasAnalysis::Location loc1=AliasAnalysis::Location(k1); //a >

I have used the follwing command, opt -load LLVComMan.so -ComMan -memdep -tbaa -mem2reg maptest.ll -S What option other than -mem2reg should be included in this case to get the right results? Does the order in which I specify the optimizations to be run make a difference? Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi Adarsh, > >> I want to check if the values a and b in the program alias.

Hi Adarsh, > I have used the follwing command, > opt -load LLVComMan.so -ComMan -memdep -tbaa -mem2reg maptest.ll -S > What option other than -mem2reg should be included in this case to get the > right results? Does the order in which I specify the optimizations to be run > make a difference? what is in maptest.ll? Ciao, Duncan.

It contains the bitcode file(without any optimization) of the below program, void map(int *a) { *a=20; } int main(){ int *a=(int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); *a=15; map(a); return 0; } I want to check if the pointer operand of each store instruction aliases with the function's arguments. I have used below code for this, virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {

Dear Jim and Henrique, thank you both for your help. I have done this but run into another problem: ? In the example?below "loc1,loc2" occurs in the (now correct, thanks to your advice) "list" twice. ? ? trips=("loc1,loc2","loc2,loc3") ? DF$listoftrips=("loc1,loc2", "loc1,loc3", "loc2,loc3","loc1,loc2"). ? I?am

Dear list, ? I am using match() to match pairs of locations, e.g. trip="loc1,loc2" from a list of such pairs, e.g. list=("loc1,loc2", "loc1,loc3", "loc2,loc3","loc2,loc1"). ? In this example match() will match "trip" with the first element of "list", but not the 4th, because the order is reversed. ? How can I get a match with

Hello, I have two data frames, X and Y, with two columns each and different numbers of rows. # creation of data frame X Loc1.alleles <- c(1,5,6,7,8) Loc1.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.15, 0.05, 0.10, 0.35) Loc1 <- cbind( Loc1.alleles,Loc1.Freq) X <- data.frame(Loc1) #creation of data frame Y Loc2.alleles <- c(1,4,6,8) Loc2.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.35,

Hi all, This is covered by (struct-path aware) TBAA, but BasicAA disagrees. See the attached testcase, where it prevents us from removing the redundant load. For arbitrary GEPs, we can't decide based on constant indices (because of e.g., &A[0][1] and &A[1][0], with *A a one-element array). BasicAA has some logic to "try to distinguish something like &A[i][1] against

I've got read.table to successfully read in my table of three columns. Most of the time I will have a set number of rows, but sometime that will be variable and sometimes there will be only be two variables in one row, e.g. Time Loc1 Loc2 1 22.33 44.55 2 66.77 88.99 3 222.33344.55 4 66.77 88.99 Is there any way to have read.table handle (1) a variable number of rows, and (2) sometime there

#Hello, #I have three data frames, X,Y and Z with two columns each and different numbers of rows. # creation of data frame X X.alleles <- c(1,5,6,7,8) X.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.15, 0.05 , 0.10, 0.35) Loc1 <- cbind( X.alleles,X.Freq) X <- data.frame(Loc1) #creation of data frame Y Y.alleles <- c(1,4,6,8) Y.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.35, 0.10, 0.20 )

Hi, why doesn't this work properly when 'positions' is a vector of strings? All the data sets get totally mixed... positions <- rep ( c("1","2","3","4","5","6","9","10","11","12","13","14", "error", "no trial"), 45 ) compound <- matrix(

Hi.. i have an expression of the form: model1<-nls(y~beta1*(x1+(k1*x2)+(k1*k1*x3)+(k2*x4)+(k2*k1*x5)+(k2*k2*x6)+(k3*x7)+(k3*k4*x8)+(k3*k2*x9)+(k3*k3*x10)+ (k4*x11)+(k4*k1*x12)+(k4*k2*x13)+(k4*k3*x14)+(k4*k4*x15)+(k5*x16)+(k5*k1*x17)+(k5*k2*x18)+(k5*k3*x19)+

Hi I would like to use shorewall for my bridge firewall. I just read the howto http://www.shorewall.net/bridge.html But in this howto there are only one net behind the bridge and have two nets behind my bridge. Can I use shorewall with two nets behind the bridge. Thanks in advance. roberto -- Ing. Roberto Pereyra ContenidosOnline Servidores BSD, Solaris y Linux Soporte técnico ISPs

Hi everyone! I'm matching two samples to create one sample that have pairs of observations equal for the k1 variable. Merge() doesn't work because I dont't want to recycle the values. x <- data.frame(k1=c(1,1,2,3,3,5), k2=c(20,21,22,23,24,25)) x y <- data.frame(k1=c(1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5), k2=c(10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17)) y merge(x,y,by="k1") k1 k2.x k2.y 1 1 20

Hey all, I am trying to work under a State Space form, but I didn't get the help exactly. Have anyone eles used this functions? I was used to work with S-PLUS, but I have some codes I need to adpt. Thanks alot, Bernardo [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I am trying to find the analytical solution to this differential equation dR/dt = k1*(R^k2)*(1-(R/Rmax)); R(0) = Ro k1 and k2 are parameters that need to fitted, while Ro and Rmax are the baseline and max value (which can be fitted or fixed). The response (R) increases initially at an exponential rate governed by the rate constants k1 and k2. Response has a S-shaped curve as a function

On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 21:22 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 11:55 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Tobias, > > > > I've attached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many > > (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. > > > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile

Hi all, I try to assess the parameters (K1,K2) of a model that describes the adsorption of a molecule onto on adsorbent. equation: dq/dt = K1*C*(qm-q)-K2*q I know the value of 'qm' and I experimentally measure the variables 'q', 'C', and the time 't'. t C q 1 0 144.05047 0.0000000 2 565 99.71492 0.1105625 3 988 74.99426

Hi all, I''m using Shorewall since one year (1.4, then 2.0) I''m trying to migrate a linux firewall from iptables rules to shorewall. The firewall has three zones - net internet - loc1 lan - loc2 second lan I have a lot of rules like this, to SNAT the ip addresses of some computers on loc1 (192.168.16.0/24) when they connect to loc2 (10.0.0.0/8) iptables -v -t nat -I

Dear list, If I know the standard error for k1 and k2, is there anything I can call in R to calculate the standard error of k1/k2? Thanks. Jun [[alternative HTML version deleted]]