similar to: [LLVMdev] Problem with compiling pass on windows xp

Hi. I have problems, when upgraded from samba sernet 3.0.24 to 3.0.25 (too early ?): 1) always must change password, when log in to windows XP professonall - samba 3.0.25 PDC - password expired 2) I can't browse widnows network on client machine - network broswer in WinXP don't respond - just hangs 3) I cann't priny any more to printers attached to another widnows machines

Hi there, I have a problem connecting from a Windows XP x64 Edition machine (nettle) to a Samba server (zeus). When I open an Explorer window and enter "\\zeus\work" in the address line, I receive an error message: "Widnows cannot find '\\zeus\work'. Check the spelling and try again, or try searching for the item by clicking the Start button and then clicking

I am trying to setup tunneling samba over ssh. I followed all the steps on the samba howto page. Then, things worked quite smoothly until I tried "net view 127.0.0.1". I get "System Error 53 has occurred". Here's what I did: I have linux server running samba 2.2.8a and windows XP as client machine. @ In windows, disabled file and printer sharing and enabled LMHOSTS

Hi, I'm not planning on doing this, but I noticed that the documentation in WritingAnLLVMPass.rst doesn't seem to specify whether or not it's legal for a function pass to inspect (and thus depend upon the contents of) other functions and I'm curious if this is an oversight or by design: To be explicit, ``FunctionPass`` subclasses are not allowed to: #. Modify a

Hai guys,   I wanted to share the following site, not my site, but in my opinion, a very good setup for a windows image/deploy server. And im Dutch so its free ;-) ... :-))   See :  https://deployhappiness.com/ and https://fogproject.org/  i've just finished a deploy setup with fogserver and the info from deployhappiness.com   Some of direct links i used:

Hello, I have Samba 2.2.3 running on a Solaris 7 server. I have many Windows 98 and a handful of Windows 2000 computers authenticating against it for logging in and filesharing. One of the users (Jeff) had his Windows 98 workstation replaced with a Windows 2000 workstation. I have other Windows 2000 computers and their users can log in fine, and they all have the same network settings for the

Hi I just started using RGui.exe under widnows. I have a text file containing date arranged in columns and rows, each column has the same format, each row with different formats. 3 of the columns are something like this 1/12/2006 3:59:45 PM I need to calculate the different in seconds between 2 selected periods using their row’s index My solution: Read the file in a data frame and

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 3 Jul 2013, at 23:05, Stephen Lin <swlin at post.harvard.edu> wrote: > >> Does anyone know if there's a defined policy about this, either way? >> If so, I think it ought to be noted in the docs, for consistency. > > The prohibition exists, at least in part, because in

Dear Tomas,Thank you.Regarding the "unnumbered" arguments, i.e. sprintf('%f %f', 1, 2, 3). This was the case I wanted to report, here a warning can be very useful.Regarding the "numbered" arguments, that is, sprintf('%$1f %$3f', 1, 2, 3). Here, omission of an argument might be intended, for example, in an application with support for multiple languages.

Dear R developers, I am wondering if this should raise an error or a warning. > sprintf('%.f, %.f', 1, 2, 3) [1] "1, 2" I am aware that R has ?numbered? sprintf arguments (sprintf('%1$.f', ?), and in that case, omissing of specific arguments may be intended. But in the usual syntax, omission of an argument is probably a mistake. Thank you for your consideration.

LLVM appears to support Library functions for ISD::SRA ,ISD::SHL, and ISD::SRL, as they are properly defined in RuntimeLibCalls.def. The library functions defined in RuntimeLibCalls.def (among others) are these: HANDLE_LIBCALL(SRA_I16, "__ashrhi3") HANDLE_LIBCALL(SRA_I32, "__ashrsi3") HANDLE_LIBCALL(SRA_I64, "__ashrdi3") However, setting

Hello , I am following http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html this to build a simple pass with in the source tree. When I try to run make command on my pass directory. I am getting following error: ../../../Makefile.common:60: ../../../Makefile.config: No such file or directory ../../../Makefile.common:68: /Makefile.rules: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target

On Aug 11, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > Have you read this document? > http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#passtype Yes, but I didn't find it as instructive as I'd hoped. The only two examples of pass sets I can find are the Kaleidoscope tutorial and StandardPasses.h (corresponding, I assume, to what llvm-gcc does). Just looking at the two of these, some

Looks like I have skipped on this, but still - a couple of questions: 1) Why there suddenly is an OrderedHash in ActiveSupport? (this glaring omission from ruby core is present in many apps already) 2) Why it doesn''t match the semantics of Hash respectively? 3) Why it''s #nodoc ? -- Julian ''Julik'' Tarkhanov please send all personal mail to me at julik.nl

Hi Eli, Thanks for pointing to the CTLZ_ZERO_UNDEF “LibCall” implementation. I have not it in the version that I am currently using, so it’s nice to know that it’s implemented now. Incidentally, the CTLZ… implementation is IDENTICAL to what I am proposing for the Shifts. This is not just adding support for “out-of-tree-targets”, but giving consistency to the fact that we have perfectly defined

Me? I would modify the first sentence from: > When writing the body of an if, else, or loop statement, > omit the braces to avoid unnecessary line noise. However, > braces should be used in cases where the omission of braces > harm the readability and maintainability of the code. To be: > Braces are optional around the body of an if, else, or loop statement, > except in cases

Dear mentors and friends working on Xapian: Sorry for bothering you here, please excuse my rudeness. In order to clearly represent my thoughts, I think my words going a bit verbose, thus it is unsuitable to put them in the chat room or it would be a hell for the readers. This email consists of 3 parts, my self introduction (I'm new here) and two question I met while building Xapian from git.

Hey Chuck, I'm afraid I can't reproduce your error but...a problem you may run into later is that opt will complain with opt: llvm/lib/VMCore/Pass.cpp:149: void<unnamed>::PassRegistrar::RegisterPass(const llvm::PassInfo&): Assertion `Inserted && "Pass registered multiple times!"' failed. Aborted I "fixed" this by replacing the LLVMLIBS line in

While learning to write LLVM passes and following the precise instructions under http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html, <http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html> I got this error when loading the hello pass to run the test program: opt -load ./Release/lib/Hello.so -hello < test/test.bc > /dev/null Error opening './Release/lib/Hello.so': ./Release/lib/Hello.so:

Hey troops! Well, it seems that I'm the one that needs some helps this time. Here's the situation. I've got a suXP Pro box with SP1 on it that whenever I try to add any 'domain_user' to any 'local_group' it gives me the following error message: "Information returned from the object picker for object "<username>" was incomplete. The object will