similar to: [LLVMdev] scalar replacement of aggregates slower?

G'Day Tanya, Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6? http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469 http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266

On Oct 20, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Tanya, > >> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects >> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- >> compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. > > I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. > Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > Ok.

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping

Hello; I was able to build and install llvm(3.0) under Ubuntu 11.10 (using the ./configure script found under llvm source, and then make and make install). While configuring, I gave --prefix as a directory where I would like llvm to be installed. I did not give --with-llvmgccdir and the --enable-optimized argument to configure. Because 3.0 doesn't come with llvmgcc source/binaries and I

f <- (structure(list(X = structure(96:97, .Label = c("119DAmm", "119DN", "119DNN", "119DO", "119DOC", "119Flow", "119Nit", "119ON", "119OPhos", "119OrgP", "119Phos", "119TKN", "119TOC", "148DAmm", "148DN", "148DNN", "148DO",

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

All, I'm having problems w/ a simple attempt to subset an xyplot. The first plot below is a plot of y versus x for certain values of a third categorical variable z. Now I'd like to further restrict this to certain values of variable y. Neither of the two attempts below work. Any suggestions much appreciated. (note: I don't want to merely use ylim since I have a loess plot and I

All, How does one replace plot symbols with say subject IDs when using xyplot? Or superimpose them next to plot symbols? I searched the archives under various key words but haven't had much. Any suggestions or links much appreciated. Sample code below. David junk.frm = data.frame(ID = rep(1:16, each = 2), x, y, z = rep(c("D", "P"), 16)) y = c( 0.4, 0.6, -0.1,

I'm using R for Mac OSX version 1.14 (2129) and the geoR package version 1.6-5 (the current version in the R repository). I'm running R in OS 10.4.6 on a Mac G4 iBook (933MHz, 640 MB DDR SDRAM). I searched the R archive and did not find a posting on this issue. I want to use the variog and variog4 functions of geoR to characterize the pattern of spatial autocorrelation of tree

>> GCC (4.5.2, Windows build from CodeSourcery) - With -O0: 110ms, with -O2: 215ms >> Clang/LLVM (Release mode, LLVM git hash 7f5714f4..., clang git hash >> 9d9cf5...) - With -O0: 110ms, with -O2: 640ms Hi Matt, I only see 2x slowdown on my machine (consistently, O2 and O3), but that's still bad. If you compile to IR then pass "opt -time-passes" you can get a

It seems that confint.default returns an empty data.frame for objects of class mlm. For example: ``` nobs <- 20 set.seed(1234) # some fake data datf <- data.frame(x1=rnorm(nobs),x2=runif(nobs),y1=rnorm(nobs),y2=rnorm(nobs)) fitm <- lm(cbind(y1,y2) ~ x1 + x2,data=datf) confint(fitm) # returns: 2.5 % 97.5 % ``` I have seen proposed workarounds on stackoverflow and elsewhere, but

Hello, I have two data frames, X and Y, with two columns each and different numbers of rows. # creation of data frame X Loc1.alleles <- c(1,5,6,7,8) Loc1.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.15, 0.05, 0.10, 0.35) Loc1 <- cbind( Loc1.alleles,Loc1.Freq) X <- data.frame(Loc1) #creation of data frame Y Loc2.alleles <- c(1,4,6,8) Loc2.Freq <- c(0.35, 0.35,

Please help: I am using qplot as below and want to specify a different color scheme for race but dont know how, can someone show me. Thanks in advance Code and input file below: library(ggplot2) library(gridExtra) d<-read.table("results", header=TRUE, fill=TRUE) plot2<-qplot(X,Y,data=d,color=race,facets=TYPE~., xlab="X", ylab="Y") + theme_bw()

Hi all, I have investigated the compile-time overhead of "Polly Scop Detection" pass based on LNT testing results. This mail is to share some results I have found. (1) Analysis of "SCOP Detection Pass" for PolyBench (Attached file PolyBench_SCoPs.log) Experimental results show that the "SCOP Detection pass" does not lead to significant extra compile-time

Here is a drop-in replacement for the R incomplete beta function. src/math/pbeta.c It is a slightly modified version of the cephes library one from Netlib. In the few cases I tried it seems to give at least 14 digit agreement with the one in S-PLUS (its hard to get more). I'm not sure what performance is like. I'd like to know if it helps with some of the problems which have been

Would like to try my luck to see if I can catch your eyes. I was trying to do some contrasts within ANOVA. I searched the archive and found a clue posted by Steffen Katzner ( http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/06/01/19385.html) I have three levels for a factor names "StdLot" and want to make three comparisons, 1 vs 2, 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 3. First,

This is what my data looks like DOC TOC TKN RM119mFeb-06 1 2 3 RM61mFeb-06 2 4 6 I have this both in a .csv and .txt I have read this in with read.csv("chemodr.csv", header=T) and this is what I get X dAmon DN.N Nitrite.N DOC OP P TKN TOC 1 RM215mFeb-06 0.000 0.1300 0.0000 2.5