similar to: [LLVMdev] TEXTREL usr/lib/llvm/libLLVM-3.0.so on PPC

Hello > Can anyone fix this TEXTREL bug in ToT? > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519 The patch in PR is wrong since it will make both darwin and windows unhappy. I will comment on gentoo PR about possible proper solution. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hi, > The patch in PR is wrong since it will make both darwin and windows > unhappy. I will comment on gentoo PR about possible proper solution. I'll give it a try as you comment on the gentoo PR. But my ppc box is in my office, so I'll post a result on next Monday (JST). Thanks,

Kimura, Can you please open an LLVM bug report for this, with a reference the gentoo PR, so that this can be properly tracked from our end? Please also add me to the CC list. -Hal On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:11:45 +0400 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Hello > > > Can anyone fix this TEXTREL bug in ToT? > >

Hi, >> The patch in PR is wrong since it will make both darwin and windows >> unhappy. I will comment on gentoo PR about possible proper solution. > > I'll give it a try as you comment on the gentoo PR. > But my ppc box is in my office, so I'll post a result on next Monday (JST). I posted my result on the gentoo PR. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c12

Hello > I posted my result on the gentoo PR. > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c12 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c13 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c14 I commented there. You need to declare function like extern "C" { static void* LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_USED PPCCompilationCallbackC <everything else goes here> }; -- With

Hi, > You need to declare function like > > extern "C" { > static void* LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_USED > PPCCompilationCallbackC > <everything else goes here> > }; revised patch is filed and it works fine. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c16 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c17 so now this revised patch can be merged into ToT? Thanks,

Ping, NAKAMURA san, thank you. Bill san, can you comment this commit? r154798 still fails on ppc32-lnux b/c *only* for this test. Loving more minor arch, the world will be better... 2012/04/04 23:26 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>: > Kimura san, > > You may ask committer of r153706. I wonder if it could be x86-independent. > >>

Kimura san, You may ask committer of r153706. I wonder if it could be x86-independent. > /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/Release/bin/llc: > error auto-selecting target for module 'No available targets are > compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.'. >  Please use the -march option to explicitly pick a target. ...Takumi as

Hi, CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll is really generic test? $ make check llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/test' Making a new site.exp file... Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest 'lit.site.cfg' file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 1024000 ; \

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 --- Comment #6 from Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> 2008-02-01 11:16:02 PST --- I've not heard people complain about this recently, is it still an issue? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

On 10.0-BETA1 amd64, build of shells/zsh fails as following: ===> License ZSH accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for zsh-5.0.2_1 ===> zsh-5.0.2_1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by zsh-5.0.2_1 for building ===> Extracting for zsh-5.0.2_1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for zsh-5.0.2.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK

The R manual says R will not build with gcc on 64-bit Solaris x86 with gcc http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Solaris "Tests with gcc32 on ?x86? and ?amd64? have been less successful: ?x86? builds have failed on tests using complex arithmetic33, whereas on ?amd64? the builds have failed to complete in several different ways, most recently with relocation errors for

Hi llvm-dev, I'm currently looking for alternatives to the synthetic references that XRay uses to keep some side-tables live, to avoid linker garbage collection from deleting those sections. Before going any further, let me give a backgrounder on what XRay does today. Background ========== XRay has two side tables we use at runtime to identify the location of the sleds for the functions

I'm not seeing how to set this path option? Here is what I get using vesamenu.c32 as an example when moved to a directory outside of the build. The current syslinux 4.06 has all the files in the same directory which is at the root of the cd. ldd vesamenu.c32 linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb77c5000) ../../com32/libutil/libutil_com.c32 => not found ../../com32/lib/libcom32.c32 => not found

Se ha borrado un texto insertado con un juego de caracteres sin especificar... Nombre: no disponible Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070828/6641b572/attachment.pl

This started somewhere before rev.122456, resulting libLLVM-2.9svn.dylib is unusabkle since it has double 'lib' embedded in its path. otool -l /opt/local/llvm/svn-r122842/lib/libLLVM-2.9svn.dylib produces this line (among others): name /opt/local/llvm/svn-r122842/lib/lib/libLLVM-2.9svn.dylib (offset 24) The way how things are on Apple, all apps read this path during link phase, look

I am looking to use llvm on windows. I know there is a pre-compiled llvm windows distribution, but this does not seem to provide libllvm. The software that I am looking to use makes use of libllvm (it is unix based, but I would like to port it to windows). I really did not wish to spend my time compiling llvm (i.e. installing it's dependencies) from scratch. What options do I have ?

On 05/31/2010 10:02 AM, John Lask wrote: > I am looking to use llvm on windows. I know there is a pre-compiled llvm > windows distribution, but this does not seem to provide libllvm. The > software that I am looking to use makes use of libllvm (it is unix > based, but I would like to port it to windows). I really did not wish to > spend my time compiling llvm (i.e. installing

Török Edwin wrote: > On 05/31/2010 10:02 AM, John Lask wrote: > > I am looking to use llvm on windows. I know there is a pre-compiled > > llvm windows distribution, but this does not seem to provide libllvm. > > The software that I am looking to use makes use of libllvm (it is unix > > based, but I would like to port it to windows). I really did not wish > > to

Hi, For openSUSE Linux we switched to cmake to build llvm and this comes with its own set of problems which are mostly workaroundable but today I got a report saying that we lost libLLVM-3.3.so in the transition. Turns out that cmake build system does not create this file even when shared libraries are enabled. See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15493 for a reported bug about this. It