similar to: [LLVMdev] GSoC: Proposal for LLVM performance audit

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] GSoC: Proposal for LLVM performance audit"

2012 Mar 29
0
[LLVMdev] GSoC: Proposal for LLVM performance audit
Apologies for the wrong email, here is my proper email address. - Vikram On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Vikram Dhillon <dhillonv10 at knights.ucf.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am a candidate for GSoC 2012 and I am looking forward to applying to > LLVM this year. I talked to a few people on IRC: chandlerc, matthewbg, > who were very helpful and directed me to post my idea on
2023 Jul 11
2
[centos/centos.org] branch main updated (92ccbf4 -> 411cbb1)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. arrfab pushed a change to branch main in repository centos/centos.org. from 92ccbf4 Update distro-faq.md new 8542f8a Removing hostdime from active sponsors new 411cbb1 Removing estruxture from active sponsors The 2 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be
2011 Jul 09
8
Show your CentOS Support
hi guys, I have about 80 CentOS T-Shirts, ranging from Medium to 3XL in size. These are the grey T-shirts we can see Ralph, Garry and the guys from hostdime modeling for us at: http://www.karan.org/pics/centos/images/002-IMG_2571.JPG If you would like one, please send me an email on kbsingh at the centos.org domain, and let me know your address and what size you would want, I would be happy
2023 Jul 11
0
[centos/centos.org] 01/02: Removing hostdime from active sponsors
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. arrfab pushed a commit to branch main in repository centos/centos.org. commit 8542f8a17f91921ca5911951426931cb7df6c413 Author: Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> AuthorDate: Tue Jul 11 08:47:59 2023 +0200 Removing hostdime from active sponsors Signed-off-by: Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> ---
2012 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions
Response file is the conventional name for files serving this purpose. A google search shows the usage of "response file" is not rare. Also it has been used in the LLVM documentation: http://llvm.org/docs/CommandLine.html#response-files Sam -----Original Message----- From: Matt Beaumont-Gay [mailto:matthewbg at google.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 1:35 PM To: Liu, Yaxun (Sam)
2009 Jun 24
2
issues with shared disk
Hello, How to mount a disk with ocfs2 FS in one node to another . Let ys say I have /dev/sda mounted on /u01 in node 1 . I need to access it from nod2 . Any solutions ? I am using ubuntu 8.10 Node 1 ====== root at 110:~# /etc/init.d/o2cb status Module "configfs": Loaded Filesystem "configfs": Mounted Module "ocfs2_nodemanager": Loaded Module
2007 Sep 26
1
asterisk audits
Hi, Some company asked me to do audits with there asterisk boxes. Is there a standard that i should be following in auditing? anyway can give me a start what to do with asterisk audits? thanks! -- Regards, Mark Quitoriano, CCNA Fan the flame... http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=user/register&r=19441 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2012 Aug 22
1
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-mingw64-win7
Guys, you can exclude me (dyatkovskiy) from this list, since I reverted my changes in r162354. -Stepan. llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder clang-native-mingw64-win7 while building cfe. > Full details are available at: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-mingw64-win7/builds/876 > > Buildbot URL:
2012 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions
Can we call this a "parameters file"? I find "response file" to be non-obvious. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Liu, Yaxun (Sam) <Yaxun.Liu at amd.com> wrote: > Thanks Chris for the comment. > > > > Since there is no objection, I attached a new patch which enables response > file support and removes the argument for controlling/disabling response >
2006 Oct 10
0
"acts_as_audited" - anyone have code for displaying the YAML stored audit-changes?
Hi, Does anyone have the code to read in the activeRBAC changes (stored in yaml) and display them in a view they could post? For a given record in the audits table for example, and the yaml that is stored in the changes column. I have read in the yaml from the changes column for a given audit table entry, but just now wondering how to consume this and display it (my first time with YAML)
2013 Sep 23
0
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] Flang's end of GSoC report
On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in July: > > http://flang-gsoc.blogspot.ie/2013/09/end-of-gsoc-report.html > > Thanks for this GSoC LLVM! Wow, this is really fantastic
2013 Sep 23
0
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] Flang's end of GSoC report
I'd like to publicly congratulate Alex for his excellent work this summer! He worked diligently throughout the entire period, and he quite-successfully tackled an ambitious project. As a result, we now have a Fortran frontend for LLVM capable of compiling real packages (BLAS, LAPACK, etc.), and correctly executing the test suites for those packages. Thanks to Alex, and to Google, we now have a
2013 Sep 23
5
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] Flang's end of GSoC report
Hi everyone! Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in July: http://flang-gsoc.blogspot.ie/2013/09/end-of-gsoc-report.html Thanks for this GSoC LLVM! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2018 Mar 26
1
[GSoC 2018] Request for review of GSoC proposal for "Improve debugging in optimized code"
Hi Vedant, I am a first year M.Tech (computer science) student at IIIT Hyderabad. I am interested in working on two of the LLVM projects. 1. Improve debugging for optimized code. 2. Implement a single updater class for the dominator tree. I have merged both the proposals in a single document because the GSoC portal allows me to upload only one document for applying to LLVM. The
2013 Sep 23
0
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] Flang's end of GSoC report
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:01:46AM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > ><mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>Hi everyone! > >> > >>Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a
2018 Jan 28
0
Fwd: [GSoC Mentors] GSoC Org Ideas List should be solid by this Monday at 19:00 UTC for review
Dear All, I'm afraid this applies to LLVM as well. So, please fill in the OpenProjects pages for GSoC today - 19:00 UTC Monday is morning in California, so Monday will be too late :( ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: 'Stephanie Taylor' via Google Summer of Code Mentors List <google-summer-of-code-mentors-list at googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:05 AM
2013 Sep 23
0
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] Flang's end of GSoC report
On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:01 AM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone! >>> >>> Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a
2013 Sep 24
1
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] Flang's end of GSoC report
----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:01:46AM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > > ><mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > >>Hi everyone! > > >> > >
2013 Sep 23
1
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] Flang's end of GSoC report
On 09/24/13 12:16 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:01 AM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > >> On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone! >>>> >>>> Today is
2018 Mar 18
0
GSoC 2018
Hello This is already done. All the relevant projects from 2017 were moved to 2018. On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 7:12 PM, Praveen Velliengiri via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Guys! > I have a suggestion about the projects in idea section. Projects are listed > as GSoC 2018 followed by GSoC 2017, I hope that some projects in the GSoC > 2017 section are already