similar to: [LLVMdev] question about SjLjEHPrepare

I have a code generation question for ARM with VFP and NEON. I am generating code for the following function as a test: void FloatingPointTest(float f1, float f2, float f3) { float f4 = f1 * f2; if (f4 > f3) printf("%f\n",f2); else printf("%f\n",f3); } I have tried compiling with: 1. -mfloat-abi=softfp and -mfpu=neon 2.

On 6 March 2014 18:09, Mark Seaborn <mseaborn at chromium.org> wrote: > LowerAtomic "lowers atomic intrinsics to non-atomic form for use in a > known non-preemptible environment". LowerInvoke strips out exception > handling by converting invokes to calls, so that landingpads, resumes, etc. > become dead and can be removed by a later pass. > > (As an aside,

On 27 May 2011 02:04, David Dunkle <ddunkle at arxan.com> wrote: > In all cases, I get code that looks pretty very the same; its like what > is below. However, I am expecting to see instruction level differences > between the vfp3 and neon versions. When I do the same with gcc 4.2 I do > see differences in the generated code. Hi David, You could see different instructions (as

Thanks, that helps a lot. > All chips (to date) with NEON have VFP3, so it's safe to assume that a -mfpu=neon will have VFP3, so all the decisions > about code generated for VFP3 can safely be assumed by targets with NEON. Just to confirm my understanding, can I correctly say in general that the llc code generator might blur distinctions between NEON and VFP3 when it can do so

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Jonas Maebe <jonas-devlists at watlock.be> wrote: > > Actually, there's another —even more fundamental— problem: the longjmp > will always restore the non-volatile registers to the contents they had > at the start of the try-block, which is not what LLVM expects when > entering an SEH-based landing pad. > The SjLjEHPrepare pass tries

Hi all, LLVM CodeGen and Tools team at Apple is looking for exceptional compiler engineers. This is a great opportunity to work with many of the leaders in the LLVM community. If you are interested in this position, please send your resume / CV and relevant information to evan.cheng at apple.com Thanks, Evan Job description The Apple compiler team is seeking an engineer who is strongly

Hello Clang- and LLVM-Experts, I was not sure which list is the right one, so I tried both - sorry for any inconvenient >o< Lately I was working a lot with exceptions under Windows and especially with the Clang compiler. Out of curiosity I came along "Exception Handling in LLVM" and tried to understand the SJLJ exception handling. At first glance this made total sense to me! Store

Greets to all, Recently, I was given the task of setting up a Samba server where I work, to accept domain logons for Win9x machines and also NT-based machines, which consist of mostly XP boxes, with a couple 2K machines as well. This domain would be replacing an older one, that was using a very out of date Samba (from RedHat 6.1) that couldn't do XP/2K at all. The new one is from

> On Nov 18, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com <mailto:bob.wilson at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:50 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Bob

Jonas Maebe via llvm-dev wrote: > Then, I tried the following: > a) if the longjmp for the try-block is taken (i.e., the setjmp right > before the try-block returns a non-zero value), jump to the landingpad BBL. > > -> Problem: LLVM does not allow regular jump edges to landingpad BBLs > > b) since the landingpad is empty anyway and falls through into the next > BBL

On Apr 12, 2011, at 5:48 PM, David Dunkle wrote: > Pardon the basic question, but does this apply to clang, llvm-gcc, or > both? Yes. -eric

Moving this month old RFC to llvmdev. Not sure why I sent this to cfe-dev in the first place... --- Based on code review discussion from John, he thinks filter expressions should be emitted into the body of the function with the try, rather than being outlined by the frontend. Instead of having the frontend create filter functions, we would use labels in place of typeinfo. The IR would look

> On Nov 17, 2014, at 5:50 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com <mailto:bob.wilson at apple.com>> wrote: > I don’t know much about SEH and haven’t had time to really dig into this, but the idea of outlining functions that need to know about the frame layout sounds a bit scary. Is it

On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > >> On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> >>> // Restrictions: >>> >>> There are several new invariants which will be enforced by the verifier: >>> >>> 1. A landing pad block is a basic block which is

On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> // Restrictions: >> >> There are several new invariants which will be enforced by the verifier: >> >> 1. A landing pad block is a basic block which is the unwind destination of an >> invoke instruction. >> 2. A landing pad block

Anna Crepes: Traubenzucker + Feldsalat spezielles Dressing (bringt selbst mit?) -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Betreff: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: 26. Datum: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:34:39 +0100 Von: Markus <universe at truemetal.org> An: universe at truemetal.org Geschenke Moritz: dunkle Schokolade. Geschenke Anna: normale Schokolade. -------- Weitergeleitete

On May 27, 2011, at 10:49 AM, David Dunkle wrote: > Thanks, that helps a lot. > >> All chips (to date) with NEON have VFP3, so it's safe to assume that a > -mfpu=neon will have VFP3, so all the decisions >> about code generated for VFP3 can safely be assumed by targets with > NEON. > > Just to confirm my understanding, can I correctly say in general that >

Is FLAC a variable bit rate format when streamed? If so, how can it be truly lossless? -- Dennis Brunnenmeyer Director of Engineering CEDAR RIDGE SYSTEMS 15019 Rattlesnake Road Grass Valley, CA 95945-8710 Office: 1 (530) 477-9015 Mobile: 1 (530) 320-9025 eMail: dennisb /at/ chronometrics /dot/ com http://www.chronometrics.com/crs/index.html <http://www.chronometrics.com/crs/index.html>

Sorry, but does your reply yes mean both? -David Sent from my iPhone On Apr 12, 2011, at 5:51 PM, "Eric Christopher" <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2011, at 5:48 PM, David Dunkle wrote: > >> Pardon the basic question, but does this apply to clang, llvm-gcc, or >> both? > > Yes. > > -eric

Can 9x/ME profiles be safely kept in the same place as NT/2K/XP profiles? i.e., are they compatible, in that 9x settings can be used on an NT based machine, and vice versa, with each OS knowing which settings it can and can't use, or is it best to just keep them separated? -- Stacy J. Dunkle LAN Manager, Pennswoods.net