similar to: [LLVMdev] FYI -- potential compile time regression on boost spirit with r152737 and/or r152752

Greetings, Does anyone know if there is a cost effective way to interface an older AT&T Spirit system into Asterisk. I'm only interested in A) being able to offer voicemail and B) possibly an AAT to callers. I've thought about just stringing the FXO cards into the line1/2 slots that go into the Spirit system... asterisk would pickup if no one answered the Spirit phones.... however....

Hi, I need help debugging a problem a problem that only shows up on PowerPC with one of my commits in the generic CodeGen parts of llvm. I'd apreciate it if someone with access to a PowerPC system could take a look at this: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23097 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D23097> - Matthias -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Here is another implementation of Markdown, this time in c++ using the Boost Spirit library. Spirit Markdown is written in (hopefully!) idiomatic modern c++ and a full suite of unit tests are provided. It is licensed under the Boost Software License (OSI compliant). The purpose of writing this is: * for me to gain expertise in the use of Spirit, both through direct experience and public review,

On Nov 9, 2018, at 9:22 AM, Vic Chester <vcsubscriptions at gmail.com> wrote: > > https://protonmail.com/ Aside from semi-charitable organizations like that, I wouldn?t expect good free email service to exist. It?s seriously complicated to run a properly-configured email server. The last time I looked into it, there were something like 24 separate RFCs an SMTP-only server had to

Greetings, R users! I am pleased to announce the release of my first CRAN package: ggghost. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggghost https://github.com/jonocarroll/ggghost Features: - Minimal user-space overhead for implementation; p %g<% ggplot(dat, aes(x,y)) - ggplot2 components added to the plot object (p <- p + geom_point()) are stored in a list within p, and evaluation

Greetings, R users! I am pleased to announce the release of my first CRAN package: ggghost. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggghost https://github.com/jonocarroll/ggghost Features: - Minimal user-space overhead for implementation; p %g<% ggplot(dat, aes(x,y)) - ggplot2 components added to the plot object (p <- p + geom_point()) are stored in a list within p, and evaluation

Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest LLVM/Polly source code. You can view the results on http://188.40.87.11:8000. Especially, I also evaluated our r187102 patch file that avoids expensive failure string operations in normal execution. Specifically, I evaluated two cases for it: Polly-NoCodeGen: clang -O3 -load

Good day to all of you and thank you for reading this. I certainly must have done something awfully wrong when I downloaded and installed R 2.0.0 on a PC with Windows 98. You will find below what happens when I try to 'update.packages()'. I know what the first 'warning message' means. About the others, I ain't got no clue. Thank you very handsomely for your wisdom. And

This nightly tester is now using an llvm-g++ that produces the new ODR linkage types. This means that many more functions are being considered by the inter-procedural optimization passes (for example, "linkonce" functions defined in a header). The result seems to be pretty huge swings (both good and bad) in the C++ tests in the testsuite, see below. Note that this tester is often

On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, > > I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest > LLVM/Polly source code. You can view the results on > http://188.40.87.11:8000 > <http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/16?compare_to=9&baseline=9&aggregation_fn=median>. > > Especially, I also evaluated

At 2013-07-31 22:50:57,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, >> >> I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest >> LLVM/Polly source code. You can view the results on >> http://188.40.87.11:8000 >>

I have the latest version of Ubuntu Studio (Karmic) and just re-installed it today. I use non-pulse applications, including Audacity and Dragon NaturallySpeaking running under wine. I have tried disabling pulseaudio every way I know how. I am getting no sound, mostly due to what are described as timeout errors. Ubuntu has been working to make it run with pulseaudio properly disabled, so that

A big compile time regression. Any ideas? Ciao, Duncan. On 22/07/11 19:13, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/253/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 253 0 2011-07-22 16:22:04

Hello, I'm trying to compile a program using boost (Spirit) but I get a llvm-g++ crash: http://pastebin.lugmen.org.ar/4666 I'm using debian packages for both boost and LLVM: libboost1.35-dev 1.35.0-5 llvm-gcc-4.2 2.2-1 (BTW, this compiles just fine, using a *lot* of memory, but fine, using g++ 4.3.x) -- Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/

Dear All, I know it is an oxymoron: good free ... service ;-) Still, can someone recommend good free email service? I definitely will not go with google, Microsoft, Apple. I don't have same strong feeling about yahoo as I have about above, but... Anyway, thanks in advance for all your advises. Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator

On 07/31/2013 09:23 PM, Star Tan wrote: > At 2013-07-31 22:50:57,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es > <mailto:tobias at grosser.es>> wrote: > >>On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: >>> Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, >>> >>> I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest >>> LLVM/Polly source

Hi, this question is meant to be a bit vague, since I'm really not familiar with all the issues involved. It's also a problem that I think many would have encountered and would have useful suggestions. According to MASS, 2nd ed., p. 158, "A major issue is that S is designed to be able to back out from uncompleted calculations, so that memory used in intermediate calculations is

On 10/25/2017 12:10 PM, Evgeny Astigeevich via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi Chandler, > > I ran the LNT benchmarks and SPEC2k6.train on AArch64 Cortex-A57. I > used revisions: Clang 316561, LLVM 316563. > > Options: -O3 -mcpu=cortex-a57 -fomit-frame-pointer > -fexperimental-new-pass-manager > > Regressions: execution time increase > > LNT > >

On 10/25/2017 12:32 PM, Evgeny Astigeevich wrote: > > Hi Hal, > > I quickly checked the execution profile. It is real. The code changed > significantly. A number of the hottest regions changed. I’ll compare IRs. > Thanks. Obviously a 1000% execution performance regression seems problematic. -Hal > JFYI FreeBench/fourinarow time graph: >

I am looking to help out my company find a more budget conscious but reliable way to hold conference calls between 5+ people. 4x a month we hold several hour long conference calls during non-business hours. All of the employees have high speed internet. Currently we dial up an AT&T conf using regular analog phones. I don't have a great grasp as to what Asterick is capable of, but my