similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add -version to llvm-mc

Hi Joey, Still the same message. I am running it from llvm-2.9/Debug/bin/clang -cc1 -ast-view ~/smd.c Is this where you were referring to? Best, Carlos Andrade http://carlosandrade.co 2012/6/9 Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> > You need to run the clang from the build directory. Something like > ./Debug+Asserts/bin/clang > > Joey > > > On 9 June 2012 22:52,

You need to run the clang from the build directory. Something like ./Debug+Asserts/bin/clang Joey On 9 June 2012 22:52, Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com> wrote: > Just in case another person comes to get stuck on this on Mac OS: > > http://web.mit.edu/mfloyd/www/computing/mac/gv/ > > This link explains the process on getting gv installed since Xaw3d > dependency

Hi Joey, I think there is still something missing. I ignored the -j as you mentioned and saw on the documentation that to compile on debug mode I could do so using: $./configure --disable-optimized As a result by the end I compiled llvm2.9 I got: llvm[0]: ***** Completed Debug Build llvm[0]: ***** Note: Debug build can be 10 times slower than an llvm[0]: ***** optimized build. Use make

TSOT, Inc. is launching a Ruby on Rails Project Night starting Tuesday January 8th, 2008 - all are invited to listen to our MC Joey deVilla, as well as presenters Andrew Burke and the Unspace group at this fun event for the Toronto programming community: TSOT Ruby on Rails Project Night Tuesday January 8th, 2008 (and every second Tuesday of the month) @ 151 Bloor St. West 5:30pm doors and eats

Just in case another person comes to get stuck on this on Mac OS: http://web.mit.edu/mfloyd/www/computing/mac/gv/ This link explains the process on getting gv installed since Xaw3d dependency even has a 'error' (actually missing few parameters) on a line that prevents code compilation that needs to be fixed before configuring and make it works. -- I have gv installed now and my bash

Just to add one more thing. I have been trying to install the gv on my mac os but I have not been successful either. The gv build requires xaw3d ( http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Xaw3d ) which apparently has not been updated for quite few years and the download is not even available anymore. Carlos Andrade http://carlosandrade.co 2012/6/9 Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com> > Hi

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> wrote: > There are plans to upload, when Chandler has the time. The YouTube account > is LLVMProject. > Should get them up this week. Sorry I didn't even remember to do it after they were posted! > Joey > On Jun 6, 2012 8:45 AM, "ankur deshwal" <a.s.deshwal at gmail.com> wrote: >

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Xiu, > > The Verifier pass runs a PreVerifier pass, which does not honour the > action argument, > and will always abort on a broken module, (Line 106, > lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp) > So the argument can not be used as described as the official document? I just want to make sure of that and

Hi, The -j option just says how many processes are started to parallelise the build. The default option is to build Debug+Asserts, so unless you add any extra arguments when you run './configure', you should be fine! Joey On 9 June 2012 21:29, Carlos Andrade <carlosviansi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Joey! > > Thanks I just replied your message on stack and I was actually

The videos are OK now. Except the video of "Autovectorization with LLVM" that have a little mistake with "_" and "-" in the filenames. Thank you. 2012/6/6 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> There are plans to upload, when Chandler has the time.

Hi Joey! Thanks I just replied your message on stack and I was actually looking into this right now. Is this the option? I just wanted to confirm: - make [-j] - The -j specifies the number of jobs (commands) to run simultaneously. This builds both LLVM and Clang for Debug+Asserts mode. The --enabled-optimized configure option is used to specify a Release build. The -j parameter is

That sounds like a good general plan, yes! Joey 2012/4/9 15102925731 <zhenkaixd at 126.com> > Thank you very much! > > To make it simpler, I may as well just implement the self-written "check > function" in C language instead of wrapping it in LLVM module. *According > to the hint you give me, all I need to do is as follow(?)* > > 1. Implement the

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:11:01AM +0800, Michael.Kang wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Xiu, > > The Verifier pass runs a PreVerifier pass, which does not honour the action > argument, > and will always abort on a broken module, (Line 106, lib/VMCore/ > Verifier.cpp) >

Yes, well, we haven't got around scheduling the next one. If no one objects, I'll set 26th as the next tentative date (roughly a month after the previous one). cheers, --renato On 12 September 2012 13:07, Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > There's nothing on the calendar for this month? > > Anton just mentioned to me that it was today, so just

Attached are the promised patches for the below proposed change. Cheers, Jack ________________________________________ From: Carter, Jack Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:33 PM To: Jim Grosbach Cc: Rafael Espíndola; List Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] [MC] [llvm-mc] Getting target specific information to <target>ELFObjectWriter Jim, You are correct: MipsSubtarget. For llvm-mc we have a

There are plans to upload, when Chandler has the time. The YouTube account is LLVMProject. Joey On Jun 6, 2012 8:45 AM, "ankur deshwal" <a.s.deshwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am unable to download videos from the site > > http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-04-12/. > > The response I always get is > > Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 503 Service

Hi! There's nothing on the calendar for this month? Anton just mentioned to me that it was today, so just trying to clear up some confusion. Thanks, Joey On 12 September 2012 04:12, Wojciech Meyer <wojciech.meyer at gmail.com> wrote: > Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> writes: > > > Just a reminder, the Cambridge LLVM Social is this Wednesday, 7:30pm >

Hi Xiu, The Verifier pass runs a PreVerifier pass, which does not honour the action argument, and will always abort on a broken module, (Line 106, lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp) Perhaps you should file a bug against this, to allow you to not abort if you so wish. Joey On 11 June 2012 09:41, Guowei Xu <myesis at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone: > > I have a little question

Thank you very much! To make it simpler, I may as well just implement the self-written "check function" in C language instead of wrapping it in LLVM module. According to the hint you give me, all I need to do is as follow(?) 1. Implement the "Check function" in the check.c file; 2. Add the check function into the module(the Hello1.bc file which I will run the functionPass on)

The flush operation of memory clients is needed for various IP blocks in the Tegra SoCs to perform a clean reset. Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> --- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c