similar to: [LLVMdev] I stole the demo.

On Monday, March 05, 2012 02:29:56 AM Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Richard, > > > I had a little time on my hands this afternoon, so I stole the Clang/LLVM > > demo and modified it to allow compiling for several other targets: > > http://ellcc.org/demo > > does it use the correct header files for the target etc? > > Ciao, Duncan. Yes, it does. The header files

Hi Richard, > I had a little time on my hands this afternoon, so I stole the Clang/LLVM demo > and modified it to allow compiling for several other targets: > http://ellcc.org/demo does it use the correct header files for the target etc? Ciao, Duncan.

Hi cschen, Here are the test scripts which I written when I was developing ARM exception handling support: https://github.com/loganchien/libcxx-scripts The script should work on Debian wheezy (cross-compiling from amd64 to armhf.) In general, here are the necessary steps: 1. Get a working arm-linux-gnueabihf gcc/g++ toolchain (for the headers and libraries) 2. Setup the include search path

A while back (2012) there were a few messages related to using YAML config files to set up how clang would build stuff, especially for cross compilers. My ELLCC project is entirely cross compilation focused, so today I decided to play around with the config file idea. Right now it only handles replacing a "-target foo" option with the options defined in the file foo in the

Today the clang/LLVM based ELLCC compiler (http://ellcc.org) was able to compile an (almost) non-trivial C++ program for a bunch of LLVM supported targets with no gnu licensed libraries. http://ellcc.org/blog/?p=231 Next step: try to compile ELLCC with itself. :-) -Rich -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Did this make it into review / commit? It's probably too late for 3.6 if it didn't, but I'd love to see it in 3.7. It would also be nice if this support could be something a bit more general in LLVM, rather than specifically in clang, so that other llvm tools (e.g. llvm-objdump) could take advantage of a similar format for target description files if they need something more

Hi, I've been working on combining LLVM, clang, the NetBSD standard C library, compiler-rt, QEMU, GDB, and GNU binutils as a cross compilation environment. My goal is to target small embedded systems, but I think that what I'm working on may be of interest to other LLVM/clang developers as I have been able to use the environment to fix several code generation issues in LLVM. As of

LLVM Weekly - #39, Sep 29th 2014 ================================ If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/39>. Welcome to the thirty-ninth issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex Bradbury](http://asbradbury.org).

Geting a seg fault. Have not investigted the cause. rkotler at mipsswbrd002:~/richard$ tar vfxz ~/Downloads/ellcc-mips-linux-2014-Mar-24-07-32-26.tgz rkotler at mipsswbrd002:~/richard/ellcc/bin$ gdb ./ecc GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are

Well, at least it works on some programs across all arches. That was some great testing you've done for us. :-) Thanks! Renato On 28 Oct 2016 23:51, "Richard Pennington" <rich at pennware.com> wrote: > On 10/28/2016 05:27 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > >> On 28 October 2016 at 23:02, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>

ELLCC is a compilation tool chain based on clang/LLVM, libc++ and the musl standard C library for Linux. Recently I was asked if ELLCC pre-built binaries could be used to build clang/LLVM TOT. It turns out that it can with some simple patches. This is a simple way to bootstrap clang/LLVM on an arbitrary Linux system that either doesn't have GCC or has a version of GCC that is too old to

On 11/27/2013 07:57 AM, Rob Stewart wrote: > On 26 November 2013 16:44, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> On 26 November 2013 15:36, Rob Stewart <robstewart57 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> $ clang -v -target armv7a-linux-eabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfloat-abi=soft >>> -mfpu=neon helloworld.c >> Hi Rod, > I'm honoured. (But Rob is also OK)

I've been working on adding code coverage support to my ELLCC project (http://ellcc.org) and I thought it would be nice to fun the index page of the HTML output of llvm-cov into something a little prettier and more useful. The initial result is here: http://ellcc.org/coverage/ If there is any interest, I'll submit the llvm-cov changes. -Rich

Hi, I asked this question a few days ago and didn't get any responses. I thought I'd try again with a little more detail. I am trying to cross compile my clang/LLVM based ELLCC cross development tools project (http://ellcc.org) on a Mac. I am targeting ARM/Linux. The build fails while building FileCheck (or tbl-gen or any of the other build tools built during the

Hi, I recently switched over to using cmake to build my clang/LLVM based ELLCC cross development project (http://ellcc.org). I also recently updated to LLVM svn version 258915 from 258477. I use ELLCC to cross compile all the tools for various Linux targets and for Windows. Yesterday, after updating the LLVM sources, I got the following error when cross building for MinGW: [ 3%] Built

On 10/28/2016 05:27 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 28 October 2016 at 23:02, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Awesome results! > I'm surprised! LLD is barely working on ARM at the moment. :) > [snip] My mistake. ARM worked for small programs, but lld failed for clang with a bunch of these errors: /home/rich/ellcc-release/bin/ld.lld: error:

With all the talk about using lld on the list, I thought it would be interesting to try using it in my clang based ELLCC cross compilation tool chain. http://ellcc.org The change was simple, since I use configuration files to tell clang how to compile, where to find libraries, etc. I described the config files here: http://ellcc.org/blog/?p=13246 All I had to do was change the linker

Eli Friedman wrote: > I haven't looked at the rest of the email carefully, but why aren't > you just implementing MULHU and MULHS? There's no point to > implementing the *MUL_LOHI variants if the processor doesn't have > them. I have implemented MULHU and MULHS. But if I take out my *MUL_LOHI stuff, the error I get is [~/ellcc/ellcc] main% ./nios2-elf-ecc -S test.c

[~/ellcc/test/source] main% cat printf.c #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char** argv) { printf("printf with the string \"%s\"\n", "my string"); } [~/ellcc/test/source] main% ~/ellcc/ellcc/x86-elf-ecc printf.c [~/ellcc/test/source] main% ./a.out printf with the string "my string" [~/ellcc/test/source] main% size a.out text data bss

(Fixed the cfe email address) On 12/18/2015 09:34 PM, Tim Northover wrote: > On 18 December 2015 at 19:15, Richard Pennington via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> It turns out that it can with some simple patches. > This sounds really cool. I think we should seriously consider putting > these patches into LLVM mainline. > >> Information on