similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm register coalescing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm register coalescing"

2012 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] tbaa differences in llvm 3.0
In our case basicaa alone returns "may alias" on our pointers and we want to override that with tbaa data to "Wont alias" when we know that the pointers will never alias. So its not covered by your case. Since the basicaa pass doesnt chain according to the llvm docs, it should have the last chance to affect the aliasing information, and that means it should be added first. If
2009 Feb 20
2
[LLVMdev] libLTO warning
Hi all, I just svn-updated the 2.5 branch on my machine and I noticed this warning during the build. *** Warning: Linking the shared library /home/maurice/installation/llvm/Debug/lib/libLTO.la against the non-libtool *** objects /home/maurice/installation/llvm/Debug/lib/LLVMCppBackend.o /home/maurice/installation/llvm/Debug/lib/LLVMMSIL.o /home/maurice/installation/llvm/Debug/lib/LLVMCBackend.o
2009 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] libLTO warning
Maurice Gittens wrote: > Hi all, > > I just svn-updated the 2.5 branch on my machine and I noticed this > warning during the build. > > *** Warning: Linking the shared library > /home/maurice/installation/llvm/Debug/lib/libLTO.la against the non-libtool > *** objects /home/maurice/installation/llvm/Debug/lib/LLVMCppBackend.o >
2009 Mar 25
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-2.5 build failure (fedora f10)
Hi all, On my Fedora 10 x86-64 the current svn dies in the following way: /home/maurice/installation/llvm-dev/utils/TableGen/Debug/TGLexer.o: In function `llvm::TGLexer::getNextChar()': /home/maurice/installation/llvm-dev/utils/TableGen/TGLexer.cpp:71: undefined reference to `llvm::TGSourceMgr::FindBufferContainingLoc(llvm::TGLoc) const'
2013 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] Missing optimization - constant parameter
On Aug 5, 2013, at 8:34 AM, Maurice Marks <maurice.marks at gmail.com> wrote: > Are you sure that's it? I commented that block out, rebuilt llvm 3.3, and it still duplicates the constant. > My concern is that long constant loads increase code size and if they can be avoided by better targeting it would be a win. My project's application of llvm tends to use a lot of long
2012 Jan 28
2
[LLVMdev] tbaa differences in llvm 3.0
Many of our pointers point into a structure where they could be considered as having the same base address. We use tbaa to indicate which ones could or could not alias because they are pointing into different substructures. This is exactly the sort of requirement that invoked the need for the restrict modifier in g++, c++0x etc. If I understand you correctly that cannot be expressed in llvm ir
2013 Oct 10
1
[LLVMdev] Missing optimization - constant parameter
On Oct 10, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Maurice Marks <maurice.marks at gmail.com> wrote: > I went back to this problem after looking at some other things. Turning on debugging I noticed that the register coalescer is trying to do the "right thing" and merge vreg0 (the previous load of the constant) with the first parameter of the call (%rdi), which is exactly what gcc does in this case -
2013 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] Missing optimization - constant parameter
I went back to this problem after looking at some other things. Turning on debugging I noticed that the register coalescer is trying to do the "right thing" and merge vreg0 (the previous load of the constant) with the first parameter of the call (%rdi), which is exactly what gcc does in this case - eliminating a second constant load, but its refusing to do the merge: Here's the
2009 Mar 25
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-2.5 build failure (fedora f10)
On 2009-03-25 15:48, Maurice Gittens wrote: > Hi all, > > On my Fedora 10 x86-64 the current svn dies in the following way: > > /home/maurice/installation/llvm-dev/utils/TableGen/Debug/TGLexer.o: In > function `llvm::TGLexer::getNextChar()': > /home/maurice/installation/llvm-dev/utils/TableGen/TGLexer.cpp:71: > undefined reference to >
2023 Jun 03
2
What could cause rsync to kill ssh?
Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from this computer. Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6. I'm copying to a CIFS share mounted on the Gentoo computer. The rsync scripts are all similar to this one: /usr/bin/rsync -v -a
2010 Jan 16
2
predict.glm
Hi, See below I reply your message for <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2008-April/160966.html>[R] predict.glm & newdata posted on Fri Apr 4 21:02:24 CEST 2008 You say it ##works fine but it does not: if you look at the length of yhat2, you will find 100 and not 200 as expected. In fact predict(reg1, data=x2) gives the same results as predict(reg1). So I am still looking for
2023 Jun 03
1
What could cause rsync to kill ssh?
Maurice R Volaski via rsync <maurice.volaski at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have an rsync script that it is copying one computer (over ssh) > to a shared CIFS mount on Gentoo Linux, kernel 6.3.4. The script > runs for a while and then at some point quits knocking my ssh > session offline on all terminals and it blocks ssh from being able > to connect again. Even restarting
2007 Jan 13
1
[Q] How can the directory location to dd output affect performance?
I have two Opteron-based Tyan systems being supported by PCI-e Areca cards. There is definitely an issue going on in the two systems that is causing significantly degraded performance of these cards. It appeared, initially, that the SATA backplane on the Tyan chassis was wholly to blame. But then I made an odd discovery. I'm running from the Ubuntu LiveCD for 64-bit. It uses kernel
2023 Jun 03
1
What could cause rsync to kill ssh?
Maurice R Volaski <maurice.volaski at einsteinmed.edu> wrote: > Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have > a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from > this computer. > > Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, > which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6. > > I'm copying to a CIFS
2004 Feb 17
1
varimax rotation in R
Hi everyone- I have used several methods to calculate principal components rotated using the varimax procedure. This is simple enough. But I would like to calculate the % of variance explained associated with each PC before and after rotation. factanal returns the % of variance explained associated with each PC but I cannot seem to get it to change after rotation. Many thanks for your
2004 Jan 07
1
3-dimensional looping Q.
Hello everyone- I have a 3-d array with the 1st dimension being monthly mean data that I would like to correlate with some time series index, for example, and save the coefficients in an array. The code I am currently running is.... rData <- array(0,c(73,144)) # array to store results for (i in 1:73) { for (j in 1:144) { rData[i,j] <- cor(slp[,i,j],y)
2002 Nov 27
2
Error message: missing value where logical needed
Dear all, I often import data sets from other programs that contain user defined missing values. As an example consider a variable MXPLOCO with a user defined missing value of as -9. > summary(MXPLOCO) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. NA's -9.000 4.750 5.000 5.349 6.000 8.500 2.000 The following command successfully converts the value -9 to NA. However,
2003 Aug 13
4
Levene test of homogeneity of variance
Has the Levene test of homogeneity of variance been implemented in any library in R? Thanks, Maurice Haynes National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Child and Family Research Section 6705 Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892 Voice: 301-496-8180 Fax: 301-496-2766 E-Mail: mh192j at nih.gov
2008 Jul 11
4
b44 module probe error
Dear All, I''m trying to configure Xen on a laptop with a BCM4401 ethernet board The Debian xen kerner 2.6.18-5 is not handling wlll that board I get the follwing in messages b44: Probe failed with error -5 Any help is welcome Regards Maurice _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2011 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] high bit of function address set incorrectly?
Are you running in the JIT? If not, what assembler are you using? This looks like an issue with encoding the relative PC distance between the call site and the call entry. Notice that the call site is at a very high address (0x7fffff....) while the target is very low. x86_64 can't encode a full 64-bit immediate offset in the call instruction, so depending on how you are generating this code