similar to: [LLVMdev] Intrinsic annotation doesn't work with C++ files

Hello again, I really need to know how to make llvm understand the annotate in C++ code or to write a new Intrinsic by myself. I tried to add a new Intrinsic corresponding to the ExtendingLLVM doc instructions, but it is too opaque and I faild. Please, advise me if you can. Sincerely, Hripsime. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Hripsime Matevosyan <hripsime.m at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi

LinkedIn ------------ Hripsime Matevosyan requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: ------------------------------------------ Jian, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Hripsime Accept invitation from Hripsime Matevosyan

Hi all, I have a trouble with LLVM rev - 147926 cast instructions. Here is my code: ............ for(std::vector<Value*>::iterator it = getElementPtrs.begin(); it != getElementPtrs.end(); ++it) { Value* current = *it; errs() << *current << "\n"; GetElementPtrInst* gep = cast<GetElementPtrInst>(current);

Hi,all. I've been reading the llvm source code for some days. Here is my problem: what does instrinsic / intrinsic function really means? Are these "the function belong to llvm and just belong to llvm"? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I want to implement a new intrinsic in llvm that will denote a parallel section within a function. I followed the documentation for extending llvm (http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html) but there is something about the working mechanism that is not clear for me. 1. Why do we have to add support for the C backend? Is this only necessary to transform the llvm assembly (bytecode) into C code

> Here is my problem: > what does instrinsic / intrinsic function really means? You probably need to look at http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html. Simply put, when you want to extend LLVM IR, say adding a new LLVM instruction, you have better try to add a intrinsic function [1] which has the same effect as the instruction you want to add. I don't think they are the same

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, when I do an "samba-tool gpo list username" I get an "faild access check on OU=name,......". But not if I do a "samba-tool gpo listall" then everything is ok. Is this normal? If I take "administrator" as username I didn't get this message. Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2

Hello; I was planning to add a new instruction to the LLVM IR (and later to MIPS backend) for TLS(Thread level speculation) support. For this I tried to follow the steps described in http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM dot html#instruction. But I could not find any llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l and llvm/lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y file in both the svn repository and the source code downloaded

Hi, I'm trying to follow the instructions on how to add a new bitcode instruction: http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html This is my first foray into the guts of LLVM and I'm not sure I'm doing things the right way. I came up with a patch that adds a NOP (no operation) that will work with llvm-as, llvm-dis, and lli. It would be nice if one of the experts could take a look and give

Hi I have a cisco 7960 Phone that connects to my Asterisk server without a problem. But when I call the echotest it just hangs up, echotests from other VoIP providers works just fine. I have tried a softphone and it works just fine. The error I get when the 7960 calls is this: -- Executing Playback("SIP/2000-180c", "demo-echotest") in new stack -- Playing

Hello all. LLVM newbie here. If anything seems glaringly wrong with my use of LLVM, that's probably why. Here's what I'm trying to do. I have modified the gem5 simulator to accept a "new" x86 instruction. I've done this by just reserving the opcode in gem5's ISA specification, just as all other instructions are specified. I'm trying to get an LLVM backend to

we just follow a common recommendation to start with intrinsics: http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html - Elena From: Owen Anderson [mailto:resistor at mac.com] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 23:57 To: Demikhovsky, Elena Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; dag at cray.com Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Adding masked vector load and store intrinsics What is the motivation for using intrinsics

Am Mo., 22. Juli 2019 um 10:50 Uhr schrieb Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov>: > Why introduce a new intrinsic (family)? It seems that would require us > to support GEPs and GEP + "multi-dim" semantics in various places. What is > the benefit over a GEP extension? Adding an intrinsic is easier than adding or extending an existing instruction, as suggested by

I was reading: https://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html And am heeding the warnings that come with new (derived) types. I'm trying to use LLVM to model chemicals. More specifically, there are several reactive groups that exist: salts, bases, acids, etc. that adequately represent their respective values. I, for obvious reasons, want to manifest those types in LLVM so I can type check a

hi, i found the term "intrinsic" in some LLVM docs i am reading, and nowhere explains what that means. i did try to google, but nothing helpful came up. anybody please help? many thanks, Jun

Hi all, I have a question concerning to std::strings. Will you please advice me how to detect if a constant string is stored in an array of std::strings or in other objects with aggregate type. For example, std::string a[2] = { "str1", "str2" }; Is there any idea better than detecting this by the signature of the string class constructor? Sincerely, Hripsime. --------------

​Hi. I want to change order of code basic blocks in memory. I visited " http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html" page and it advised me to ask it before any effort. What parts of LLVM help me and how? I am a newbie on LLVM. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Have you looked at these? https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html https://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:06 AM div code via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Of course, in this sense they are not platform-dependent. I just want to > write a semantics-correct version of such intrinsics and let my static > analyzer goes smoothly. > > On

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Richard Diamond < > wichard at vitalitystudios.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm very unclear and why you think a generic

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I lost my DC with all fsmo-roles. I try to "seize" the roles to another DC. It worked four out of five roles: root at SVL-V-AD1:~# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=rid Attempting transfer... Transfer unsuccessful, seizing... FSMO seize of 'rid' role successful root at SVL-V-AD1:~# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=pdc Attempting